Body General body information and techniques for restoration, repairs, and modifications.

GFX or Not???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #1  
RacerXXX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Willowick, OH
Car: 96 Chevy P/U
GFX or Not???

I was wondering what everyone thought of the GFX on the 91-92 Firebirds. I was think of pulling mine off and making a Formula/Firehawk look. Is there a real weight difference. Let me know your opinions. Thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 11:36 AM
  #2  
Firebat's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,786
Likes: 3
I think they look terrible. The 85-90 ground efx package was done much better. You could sell the 91-92 efx and make some money off of them since they are more rare. I like the 91-92 look only without gnd efx.

I think they weigh around 75 lbs altogether including the metal brackets for them.

Bad thing is that it is a little work and time consuming to fill in the holes and stuff like that.

Last edited by Firebat; Apr 19, 2006 at 11:40 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 01:52 PM
  #3  
MNformula350's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 17
I don't care much for the rain gutters either, when I get a 91-92 Firebird Convertible (I am buying myself one as a graduation present after college), I will be removing them and just have it look like a base bird vert.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 02:02 PM
  #4  
cooltc2004's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Peg Leg




I like the way my car looks.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #5  
RacerXXX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Willowick, OH
Car: 96 Chevy P/U
I'm deffinately leaning towards taking them off and selling the FX to buy go-fast parts. I think the hard part may be finding a Formula rear bumper cover.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 03:40 PM
  #6  
Firebat's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,786
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by RacerXXX
I'm deffinately leaning towards taking them off and selling the FX to buy go-fast parts. I think the hard part may be finding a Formula rear bumper cover.
Try taking off the rear ground effect on the back bumper first. The back bumper looks like its 2 pieces.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 03:42 AM
  #7  
Poncho Villa's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: San Diego CA
Car: Badass 1991 Firebird
Engine: Screamin' 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.42's waiting to go in!
I like the GFX, I have a blue '91 and it looks schweet. GFX are in perfect shape though. I might even go farther and put rubber skirts underneath to better block air from under the car. You can feel em working at speed. Must say though I also like the Formula look, a close call leaning toward GFX. My .02!
Reply
Old May 13, 2006 | 08:10 AM
  #8  
j dezzy's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 2
From: Massillon, Ohio
Car: 87 TA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
I really don't like the look of the aero GFX on my 91. I'm getting rid of them as soon as I pick up new ones.
Reply
Old May 13, 2006 | 07:52 PM
  #9  
Poncho Villa's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: San Diego CA
Car: Badass 1991 Firebird
Engine: Screamin' 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.42's waiting to go in!
I guess you could always do a combo, 89 style GFX, with a 91 nose maybe? I like the 91 nose better than the Formula nose, however it has skirts below it, so you have to have some kind of gfx to use that nose.

The theory behind the 91-92 gfx on the sides is to guide air up the side of the car so it can't get underneath and create lift. Also, the nose has brake cooling scoops under it. Of course the whole setup could be improved with rubber skirts (I think some years had them, attached to the rocker seam underneath), belly pans and a pan under the back bumper to smooth air exit. I guess I'm up to about 4 cents now. I do like Formulas, but they look better lowered a bit IMO. I'm going to wash my Bird today.
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 10:04 AM
  #10  
j dezzy's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 2
From: Massillon, Ohio
Car: 87 TA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Yeah, my 91 has those rubber skirts you're talking about.
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 05:03 PM
  #11  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
i don't know about the birds, but the camaro's are nearly 100lbs lighter without gfx!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jorlain
Exterior Parts Wanted
8
Jun 29, 2017 11:04 PM
Reddeath210
Firebirds for Sale
14
Oct 6, 2015 08:20 AM
LittleFranks
Camaros for Sale
7
Sep 17, 2015 12:22 PM
snakeshooter
Body
3
Sep 7, 2015 11:15 AM
LittleFranks
Camaros for Sale
3
Aug 20, 2015 03:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 AM.