To be or not to be.. Ground effects.
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: Northwest Indiana, Kouts
Car: 88' White-Black Trans Am
Engine: Trying to find a motor
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: To be or not to be.. Ground effects.
Its kinda a 50/50. They dont look bad without them,but the ground effects on the 91-92's gave it that Aerodynamic feel. I personally like them better with but its your choice
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Re: To be or not to be.. Ground effects.
That's a sexy car. And I know what you mean. I see cars without them and think, "Wow, I want to do that to my car." Then I see some with them and think, "Wow, my car could look like that too."
...Torn.
...Torn.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 68
From: Atlanta
Car: '02 T/A WS6, '91 T/A, '91 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1, LB9, L03
Transmission: T56, 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 10 bolt, 2.73 10 bolts
Re: To be or not to be.. Ground effects.
If it's a T/A, then leave them on. If it's a base Firebird with the W68 package, then take them off since you could get base Firebirds with or without the W68 (ground effects) package.
Oh, and if the front ones are nice and not all torn up, send them to me
Oh, and if the front ones are nice and not all torn up, send them to me
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post