Body General body information and techniques for restoration, repairs, and modifications.

Ground Effects

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2001 | 11:44 PM
  #1  
Buck268's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Troy, MI, USA
Ground Effects

I am not sure what ya'all think of ground effects, but I am curious as to how good/bad my '91 Camaro would look with out them. If any has pictures of some camaro's with out ground effects, please post or link! thanks!
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2001 | 12:07 AM
  #2  
un4givin89's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 1
From: Lan Terminal
terrible. Trust me. They should have just designed the bottom the way gfx make it look. Otherwise it looks goofy, all the edges curve under and the nose getts really f*up looking, it makes itlook like its 5 ft off the ground.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2001 | 12:27 AM
  #3  
deadbird's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 27
From: So.west IN
Car: 87 Formula/ 00 Xtreme
Engine: TPI 305/ v6
Transmission: struggling t-5/ 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 3.08/ 3.23
Here's my terribly goofy looking 84

http://www.deadbird.org/b/tire-.jpg

Granted the car itself is a p.o.s. but, I prefer it w/o fx, I wish it didn't look 5ft off the ground though.

I wouldn't suggest taking off the gfx if you have them though unless you feel like filling holes & puting on a new front bumper.
------------------
The mind is like a parachute, it only works when its open

[This message has been edited by deadbird (edited September 29, 2001).]

[This message has been edited by deadbird (edited September 30, 2001).]
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2001 | 09:13 AM
  #4  
Buck268's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Troy, MI, USA
Deadbird, I actually LIKE the way yer camaro looks, you can actually see some of the camaros classic lines with out the ground effects. Any way, when i repaint mine, i'll find out fer sure if I like no grnd fx...thanks fer the replies
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2001 | 03:56 PM
  #5  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
I actually prefer Firebirds without the GFX & the Camaros with the GFX. I like single color cars generally, but there are some multi color cars I have seen I like. Blue over gray for example.

John

------------------
G O D BLESS AMERICA
87 Formula Yellow/Black

5.1 TPI Automatic
Baer 12" brakes 4 wheels, KYB AGX Adjustable Shocks & struts, Custom Leather interior, WAAAY TOO MANY MODS TO LIST

87 Formula TPI (5 Speed) Yellow/Gray STOCK

1967 Buick Riviera 430hp Turns high 14's (Not bad for 4300 lbs)

83 Camaro (Parts)
83 T/A (parts)

http://www.3rdgenformula.com
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2001 | 08:51 AM
  #6  
Red T-top 305's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
I like mine without the ground FX, it's a stock SC. I don't have a pic, but I have noticed that if you take the FX off of a Z-28, it seems to have a different nose than the stock ones. The under-chin air dam on stock ones may not be on yours, right in front of the tires.
I do know that without the FX, the car is lighter and has better aerodynamics. One wouldn't think so, but Chevy did tests or something....
The reason I like it without is mainly because everyone else has 'em...to find a stock Camaro that isn't beaten up (or V-6) is rare around here...

Reply
Old Oct 4, 2001 | 03:37 PM
  #7  
87_Camaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
From: tucson AZ, USA
i think it looks just as good as one with ground effects, it does make you car look higher off the ground though, here are a few pics of my baby:







i know you cant really see the bottom of my car but in the second pic, right under the red strip would be where the GFX start, i love my SC GFX or not, it's just your tast.
as long as it's a Camaro and looks tight, its all the same

------------------

-------------------------
87 V6 2.8 MPFI Camaro SC
-------------------------
Modded dual snorkle intake "bottoms hacked off", K&N air filters, Crane Cams 8.5mm fire wire, Accel Cap and Rotor, MSDcoil. upcoming mods:
Dynomax CatBack exaust system = VERY SOON
crane cams camp shaft, CC roller rockers, double timing chain

[This message has been edited by 87_Camaro (edited October 04, 2001).]
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2001 | 04:47 PM
  #8  
Mac's Avatar
Mac
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Mokena, IL USA
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 H.O.
Transmission: 700r4
I think they look gross without the ground effects, especially on one that originally had ground effects, i agree though that firebirds look good without them, cause the front end is so different
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2001 | 05:43 PM
  #9  
MSTNG KLR's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: MA
I think that you should leave the gfx on there they look to high without em, unless you lower it. I have never seen a camaro without gfx that was lowered, might look good..

------------------
87' Camaro Z28
305 TPI
Stage 2 hypertech chip
160 degree thermostat
Custom ram air w/K&N's
air foil
shift kit
aluminum driveshaft
posi
VST gas ryder gas shocks
3" flowmasters
Vortex cherry bomb high flow muffler
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2001 | 12:18 AM
  #10  
Camarokid01's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 412
Likes: 1
From: Springfield,Virginia,US
here is a link to my website www.geocities.com/carsnjunk cick on My 86 camaro and you will see my 86 sport coupe that has been lowered with the eibach pro kit I think I took the picture not to long after I lowered it so the springs have settled a little more now.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2001 | 01:10 AM
  #11  
Vomex's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
I think the gfx look good on cameros and firebirds. It makes them look lower and gives them a more aggressive look.

------------------
Later,
Vomex
'89 GTA 5.7L TPI
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2001 | 02:45 PM
  #12  
Diabolical's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 85 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 305HO L69
Transmission: T5
here's my 87 camaro lt


------------------


[This message has been edited by Diabolical (edited October 06, 2001).]
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
$750 L98
LTX and LSX
10
Feb 1, 2025 02:25 PM
Falcon50
DFI and ECM
81
Aug 22, 2020 03:26 PM
jovibuilt
Exterior Parts Wanted
3
Oct 18, 2015 08:12 PM
lewandom
Electronics
2
Oct 1, 2015 08:15 AM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM.