Body General body information and techniques for restoration, repairs, and modifications.

rear bumper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2002 | 08:41 PM
  #1  
84SportCoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Horsham PA
rear bumper

what is the different in the 90 rs rear bumper and a 91 rear bumper??
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 11:24 PM
  #2  
Blue502's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,625
Likes: 1
From: Happy Valley, Oregon
The bottom flairs out a bit on the '91-'92 style. The earlier style is flat and rounds off on the bottom. Other than that, nothing is different, a direct bolt on, and emblems fit in the same locations.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 05:18 PM
  #3  
84SportCoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Horsham PA
will it look right with the early ground effect?? will it be noticeable ??? I have a good 91-92 bumper and can get 1/4 Ground effects. any ideas.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 05:46 PM
  #4  
un4givin89's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 1
From: Lan Terminal
Nope
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 05:55 PM
  #5  
84SportCoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Horsham PA
nope what?? are you saying that with a 91-92 rear bumper and 91-92 1/4 ground effects the rest of the 89 iroc effects will stand out? I appriciate the replys but please explaine them. THANKS MIKE
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 10:26 PM
  #6  
85SportCoupeto89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
From: Cove, Arkansas
Car: 85 Camaro SC
Engine: V6
Transmission: 700r4
It should look ok. I think un4givin89 thought you were going to put the 91-92 rear bumper and the r1/4 panels on only, without the other ground effects.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 10:29 PM
  #7  
84SportCoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Horsham PA
thanks for the insite. how can i tell my bumper cover is a 91-92. i was told it was.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 10:55 PM
  #8  
Tonyrodz's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Transmission: auto
Originally posted by Blue502
The bottom flairs out a bit on the '91-'92 style. The earlier style is flat and rounds off on the bottom. Other than that, nothing is different, a direct bolt on, and emblems fit in the same locations.
That's how you can tell.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 11:01 PM
  #9  
Blue502's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,625
Likes: 1
From: Happy Valley, Oregon
The difference in appearance is so subtile, that it wouldn't matter if you changed the rest of the gfx or not. I would look fine either way. Just not original.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 11:02 PM
  #10  
Blue502's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,625
Likes: 1
From: Happy Valley, Oregon
The difference in appearance is so subtile, that it wouldn't matter if you changed the rest of the gfx or not. I would look fine either way. Just not original.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
Mutillator
Exterior Parts for Sale
2
Oct 1, 2015 06:05 PM
LittleFranks
Camaros for Sale
7
Sep 17, 2015 12:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.