Car Audio Car audio related questions and helpful hints for building the best sound system for your car or getting the most out of what you have.

Round or Oval? 6x9 VS 6.5's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #1  
Mkos1980's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
Round or Oval? 6x9 VS 6.5's

Which would sound better. If rounds would sound better is it easy enough to make a plate for use behind the sail panels?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 10:07 PM
  #2  
mnorton's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: Northern California, Redding
Car: Red 1987 IROC Convertible
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.45
Rounds are always better.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 10:12 PM
  #3  
di11avou's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: IA
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 305ci TBI
Transmission: 700R4
LOL! I was about to ask this same question!

What's the reason behind rounds being better, mnorton?

It wouldn't be hard at all to make a 6 1/2 plate. Just use the original as a guide.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 10:41 PM
  #4  
Sitting Bull's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Originally Posted by mnorton
Rounds are always better.
Au contraire, mes ami!

Round or square or oblong, it makes NO audible difference
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 02:40 AM
  #5  
mnorton's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: Northern California, Redding
Car: Red 1987 IROC Convertible
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.45
Basically it amounts to a physical tension (surface to air) issue on the cone.

If you have a round cone it will have somewhat equal tension 360 degrees around the cone, and will thus result in a more accurate "air wave" representation of the electronic signal that stimulates the cone (voice coil to cone). Sounds like a bit of B.S. I'm sure until you think about it in a little more depth.

For example: A 6 X 9 cone has inherent waveform distortion "built into" the shape of the cone. The physical tension on the surface changes all the way around the cone. Stated in another way, the tension at the two ends of the cone is much different than the tension on the two sides. Round cones have somewhat equal tension all the way around them; Oval (or square) cones do not.

As a result: For the very same electro-mechanical reasons, an Oval cone will ALWAYS tear itself apart before a Round cone will.. The physical movement (the throw, or the actual cone distance traveled per electronic stimulus) results of a waveform from a Round cone will be physically more symmetrical than that of an Oval cone. Thus waveform reproduction is going to be more pure and less distorted. Your ear can hear this difference....

Drop a pebble into a pool of water and then look at the results. I think that very common example describes the wave front events pretty well.

There have been many attempts at compensating for the inherent physical differences in the creation of non-round cones, but to date, Round cones are still the best at reproducing audio waveforms.

Last edited by mnorton; Jun 20, 2006 at 03:30 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 04:26 AM
  #6  
1991CamaroRslow's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
Seal those panels up and go with a decent set of 8in subwoofers. It's very easy to pull out the steel 6X9 panel and make a wood panel to mount whatever you can fit back there.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 06:50 AM
  #7  
Sitting Bull's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
I will believe it when I hear it, and so far I haven't heard it. You have made the case that round sounds better but that is a purely subjective assessment. Round may sound different but that is not necessarily better.

Examing the extremes to which various shapes can be subjected to, with regard to electro-mechanical stresses, only means that round ones can, on average perhaps, absorb more punishment before flying apart. Distortion is at such an level in this event that an accurate measurement of the fidelity of the produced sound to that of the original sound is impossible to ascertain. And doubtless the resultant squawk would be less than pleasant
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #8  
mnorton's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: Northern California, Redding
Car: Red 1987 IROC Convertible
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.45
For large Bass cones, or Sub Woofers as many people like to call them, there really isn't a lot of what I would typically call "music" coming out of them. Basically all they are doing is pushing large volumes of air. Fidelity in this case to me really is how well they can push that low frequency spectrum of air waves. Do the Bass tones emitted sound "clean", or are they "muddy"? Do the Drums sound like they are full, and do they seem to have the proper tones?

Basically what you want is a cone that can push out, and then recover back to a neutral state quickly and without much physical distortion along the way. Big cones with long throws can push more air. Round cones can do that well, better than oval or square cones can.

For me, I like the sound that a round cone puts out. And actually I typically like the sound of paper cones better than plastic. That's the beauty of audio, if it sounds good to you, then it is good. The shape of the cone doesn't really matter.... If you can't hear it, then it's not there.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 12:14 AM
  #9  
Brisk's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
From: Beautiful BC
Car: '88 IROC-Z / '91 Z28 / '91 GTA
Engine: LT4 Hot Cam 305 / L98 355 / MR 383
Transmission: 5-spd / 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:45 / 3:23 / 3:23
well I won't argue, but I'll tell you this.. I pulled the 6x9's and made a plate with 1/4" plywood and installed a 6.5" infinity kappa component set. Sounds grrrrreat!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #10  
Cam-aro's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Joplin, Missouri
Car: '91 Z28
Engine: L98 H/C/I - 400whp
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 12-Bolt(4:30 w/spool)
I still prefer 6x9's with an amplifer...

What ya need to do though(like I've done on the last two Camaros) is convert your dash speakers to 5.25 and put in some components!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #11  
1991CamaroRslow's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
There is no real way to get good imaging out of tweeters in those back sail panels. If you really want to keep the 6x9's I would recommend putting in a set of woofer only 6X9's like Kicker and McIntosh used to make. As for the front stage, either do door build outs, or put kick panels in; the only time I would recommend using the dash speaker location would be if you want to make some kind of front stage fill with a set of attenuated tweeters. Really the bottom line for a Camaro system is how much time you want to spend and how much money you have to put into your system. If you don't mind the way the stock system sounded when it was young and fresh then just buy a cheaper set of efficient coaxials and put them in the stock locations, if you want something that will sound powerful and realistic you'll need to change some things about the layout of the entire system. Lastly to keep on topic, 6X9's and 6.5's will both sound terrible if they're driven into distortion. However if you keep them playing clean the 6X9's will offer some more low range extension, something that shouldn't be an issue if you're using a subwoofer.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C409
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Dec 17, 2016 09:35 PM
FormulaEngland
European Region
38
Jul 17, 2016 07:33 AM
Bohemian
Aftermarket Product Review
11
Nov 25, 2015 09:38 PM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
5
Oct 13, 2015 12:33 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.