Sub port spacing?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota, FL
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 400 CI
Transmission: 700R4
Sub port spacing?
I am building a sub enclosure using plans from TGO. I have dual 10" subs and each calls for a 4" diameter by 12" long port. The enclosure height is only about 13". Is it okay to have the port pipe just an inch off the bottom. I could try slanting it but that makes the hole harder to drill. I could raise the pipe up 3/4" out the top and make a bezel for it which would be easier than angling it. Would it lose a lot of sound if I made the pipe just 10"?
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Sub port spacing?
Unfortunately this is NOT the best site for intelligent audio responses. I would recommend you check out one of the many audio forums.
With that said, the port dimensions depend highly on the specification for your subs, your intended power, and your preferred tuning frequency. I highly doubt you need a 4" port for a 10" sub. What sub and amp are you using?
With that said, the port dimensions depend highly on the specification for your subs, your intended power, and your preferred tuning frequency. I highly doubt you need a 4" port for a 10" sub. What sub and amp are you using?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota, FL
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 400 CI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Sub port spacing?
All Polk Audio. I have the PA660 amp for the speakers and the monoblock PA880 for the subs. The subs are the Polk DXI 10s.
This shows port diameter and length under the details tab.
http://www.crutchfield.com/p_107DXI1...65#details-tab
This shows port diameter and length under the details tab.
http://www.crutchfield.com/p_107DXI1...65#details-tab
Last edited by 1988GTA500HP; Aug 21, 2012 at 09:03 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Sub port spacing?
All Polk Audio. I have the PA660 amp for the speakers and the monoblock PA880 for the subs. The subs are the Polk DXI 10s.
This shows port diameter and length under the details tab.
http://www.crutchfield.com/p_107DXI1...65#details-tab
This shows port diameter and length under the details tab.
http://www.crutchfield.com/p_107DXI1...65#details-tab
http://www.linearteam.dk/default.aspx?pageid=winisd
A 1" gap between the end of the port and the box floor is probably a bit tight, but I don't think you will have any problems with it. You can always put a bend in the port. That is what I would do.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota, FL
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 400 CI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Sub port spacing?
Well the box is actually 2.075 cubic ft, which I split in half so each box is ~1.0375. So it is under the recommended size but larger than the sealed size. Am I better off not to port it?
Edit: I could build a 1'x1'x3" tall extension into the top of the box for each to get to the 1.25 cf if that would be better because I haven't built the top yet.
Edit: I could build a 1'x1'x3" tall extension into the top of the box for each to get to the 1.25 cf if that would be better because I haven't built the top yet.
Last edited by 1988GTA500HP; Aug 22, 2012 at 10:49 AM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Sub port spacing?
So its 1.04 ft^3 - speaker volume - port volume = 1.04 - ~0.05 - 0.087 ~= 0.9 ft ^3. If you cannot match the recomended volume, then your tuning is going to be off with that sized port. Most likely the tuning will be at a higher frequency. You really need to do the analysis to get it right. Sealed is fine, and its what I like for music, but you get less volume per watt.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota, FL
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 400 CI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Sub port spacing?
So its 1.04 ft^3 - speaker volume - port volume = 1.04 - ~0.05 - 0.087 ~= 0.9 ft ^3. If you cannot match the recomended volume, then your tuning is going to be off with that sized port. Most likely the tuning will be at a higher frequency. You really need to do the analysis to get it right. Sealed is fine, and its what I like for music, but you get less volume per watt.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





