Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Is 20* too much initial timing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2002 | 03:06 PM
  #1  
Max's Avatar
Max
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI USA
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Is 20* too much initial timing?

I have been tunning to get the most out of my new carb set up. Now that I have that dialed in I'm looking for a little more power by fine tunning the ignition.

My distributor has 14* mechanical advance in by 2000 rpm
and 10* of vaccum advance.

I was running 16* initial advance for a total of 40* advance

I just bumped it up to 20* initial advance for a total of 44* advance and it seems to run even better.

It was originally a LO3 engine and I suppose that the compression is fairly low and I always use at least 92 octane gas.

There doesn't seem to be any problem with detonation. I have run it at WOT up a steep hill to almost 5,000 PM and it doesn't skip a beat.

Is it likely that my combination works best with so much advance?

Should I go even farther?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2002 | 04:46 PM
  #2  
IHI's Avatar
IHI
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo, Iowa
Car: 86 firebird with 98 firebird interi
Engine: pump gas 427sbc Dart Lil M 13.5:1
Transmission: Oldani TH400 w/ BTE 9" convertor
Axle/Gears: 31 spline Moser/full spool/4.11Rich
As you read more of these posts you'll keep hearing that every motor likes different things and such is the case with your car. I have my 355 set at 17 intial and 32 full in at 3K, anymore and it'll desiel like a bitch. My buddies 350 malibu has his set at 40 degree all in at 2500rpm, so if that works for your runner hard.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2002 | 05:23 PM
  #3  
Jester's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
From: Homestead, Fla
Thats a little high but not unheard of. If you can run it without knocking..great. 14 degrees mechanical isn't much tho..what kind of wieght set are you using? Most sets have 20-22 degrees. If you could get that, even in a little later, then drop the initial a bit to keep the same total you'd be better off.


Also, there is nothing wrong with running high octane and that much timing, but if you'd like to save yourself a little cash you can probably try 87 or 89 octane and drop your curve down a bit without losing much power.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2002 | 05:45 PM
  #4  
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
If a sbc needs more than 36/38 deg total advance n/c vacuum adv. @ high rpm I'd suspect something wrong with my tuning method. Your balancer or timing tab may be out of wack.
Most every normal sbc needs 32 to 36 deg advance to make max power. Increasing initial timing always makes it feel more snappy
but can be decieving. Try to determine why yours wants more than everyone else in the world.
Some thing is wrong.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2002 | 06:24 PM
  #5  
89formula#1's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Cinnaminson, NJ
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: Carbed 5.7
Transmission: TKO-600
hey guys how do u figure out how much timing u have? i don't have a timing gun but i am gettin one and i am curious how u know this?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2002 | 01:36 AM
  #6  
IHI's Avatar
IHI
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo, Iowa
Car: 86 firebird with 98 firebird interi
Engine: pump gas 427sbc Dart Lil M 13.5:1
Transmission: Oldani TH400 w/ BTE 9" convertor
Axle/Gears: 31 spline Moser/full spool/4.11Rich
If you get a timing light make sure to buy an adjustable one-little more but 10X better than the old gun. when you first start your motor, let it warm up, set the gun at zero degrees and slowly turn the **** till the marker on the harmonic balancer matches the notch on the timing chain cover, that's your intial timing. Then have a friend bring the motor up to usually 2500 or 3000 rpm, have the timing light pre-set to the desired timing and then turn the distributor till the marks line up again, let it idle down and re-check your intial timing, it will be different if you change the total advance, but that is ultimately what you want to base the engines timing on.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2002 | 07:13 PM
  #7  
ShaneBuss2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: houston tx
Car: 1992 Firebird Coupe
Engine: 357ci Carb
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi, stock rear
I always get confused on this. At WOT, doesnt your vacuum go to 0?

The timing you get measuring your car at 3000 rpms in your driveway would definitely differ from 3000rpms wot in gear down the highway..??

someone help me out..
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2002 | 08:03 PM
  #8  
IHI's Avatar
IHI
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo, Iowa
Car: 86 firebird with 98 firebird interi
Engine: pump gas 427sbc Dart Lil M 13.5:1
Transmission: Oldani TH400 w/ BTE 9" convertor
Axle/Gears: 31 spline Moser/full spool/4.11Rich
My distributor is all mechanical-NO vaccum canister so centrifical force advances mine, it was spun balanced and tested to insure this. All my other cars that had vaccum canisters, I unplugged the hose going to the canister and plged the hose end, ran the motor till about 2000 rpm and set it to my desired timing. then reinstall the vaccum hose.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2002 | 10:16 PM
  #9  
Jester's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
From: Homestead, Fla
Originally posted by ShaneBuss2
I always get confused on this. At WOT, doesnt your vacuum go to 0?

The timing you get measuring your car at 3000 rpms in your driveway would definitely differ from 3000rpms wot in gear down the highway..??

someone help me out..
Thats why distributers are supposed to be hooked up to a ported source, not manifold. Ported sources are negligable at idle, and increase as rpm does.

And yeah..it is much different underload than in neutral. You need a dyno to really see.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2002 | 04:13 PM
  #10  
ShaneBuss2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: houston tx
Car: 1992 Firebird Coupe
Engine: 357ci Carb
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi, stock rear
they increase as idle rises, but at WOT aren't they zero again?


I just dont see why people figure in vaccuum advance at WOT...
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2002 | 12:27 PM
  #11  
ChrisFormula355's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 1
From: Tucson,AZ,USA
Car: Junk
Engine: Junk with nitrous
Transmission: Junk with gears
Re: Is 20* too much initial timing?

Originally posted by Black '89 RS Convertible
My distributor has 14* mechanical advance in by 2000 rpm
and 10* of vaccum advance.

I was running 16* initial advance for a total of 40* advance

I just bumped it up to 20* initial advance for a total of 44* advance and it seems to run even better.

16 degrees total plus 14 degrees mechanical equals 30 degrees NOT 40. That 10 degrees of vacuum advance doesn't mean didly squat when you mash the go peddle. When people post numbers in magazines referring to total timing, they are always talking about inital plus mechanical, not initial plus mechanical plus vacuum, that wouldnt' make any sense. So when you had your timing bumped to 20 initial plus the 14 mechanical that puts you at 34 total which is actually pretty good, in fact I would go a little more even and try 36-38 total as small block 305's seem to like lots of timing.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2002 | 04:57 PM
  #12  
Max's Avatar
Max
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI USA
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Thanks a lot. That makes sense. I'll try 24* initial with 14* mechanical for a total of 38*. It should have even snapier throttle response.

Should I plan to increase the jetting to complement the additional timing advance? Does that matter?


Is there a trade off between Torque and Horsepower.
In other words, If I advance it even more and the throttle response becomes even better, will the motor produce less power up high like around 4500 - 5000 RPM?

Do I have to sacrifice one for the other or can I have both.

Lance
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2002 | 05:30 PM
  #13  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
You need to understand why the timing is advanced. If the spark occurred right when the piston was at TDC, the piston would be going down (from inertia) before cylinder pressure would drive it down. The idea of spark advance is to start the fire soon enough before TDC that pressure has started to build up to get the piston moving down by force.

Starting the fire too soon or too late will result in loss of power (and throttle response). And, the rate of burn varies with engine speed and load. That's the idea of tayloring the advance curve - to get it right on time at all engine speeds and loads.

So, just changing the setting of the distributor housing (base or initial timing) isn't the total answer. How your mechanical and vacuum advance work together, along with the initial and total timing and the rate at which the advances come in and/or go off, determine whether both WOT power and throttle response will be improved.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2002 | 06:13 PM
  #14  
ChrisFormula355's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 1
From: Tucson,AZ,USA
Car: Junk
Engine: Junk with nitrous
Transmission: Junk with gears
Originally posted by Black '89 RS Convertible
Thanks a lot. That makes sense. I'll try 24* initial with 14* mechanical for a total of 38*. It should have even snapier throttle response.

Should I plan to increase the jetting to complement the additional timing advance? Does that matter?


Is there a trade off between Torque and Horsepower.
In other words, If I advance it even more and the throttle response becomes even better, will the motor produce less power up high like around 4500 - 5000 RPM?

Do I have to sacrifice one for the other or can I have both.

Lance
Well, in a nutshell, I've discovered that too much timing drops off the power just as bad as too little, even if its only off by a few degrees, and really the only way to know for sure is to go to the track. however 34-38 total for a carburated small block with a mild cam seems to be the golden rule that you can't really go wrong with.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2020 08:26 AM
bellez77
Body
14
Sep 5, 2015 08:39 PM
Feffman
Mid-West Region
0
Aug 13, 2015 07:12 AM
Feffman
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
0
Aug 13, 2015 07:11 AM
MustangEater82
Brakes
0
Aug 11, 2015 07:52 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.