opinons on this cam for my motor details inside
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: TBD
opinons on this cam for my motor details inside
Motor:
79 305
90 58cc centerbolt 305 Heads (TBI)
88 Monte Carlo 4bbl intake and carb
Stock Self aligning rockers
Goal 250-290 hp (enough to move along)
this is a budget build obviously
car will have headers with 1 5/8 in header primaries
2.5in custom exhuast with magnaflow muffler
here is the cam
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33614
270/280 duration
420/443 lift
204/214 duration @ .050"
112 lobe separation
do you guys think this will get me close?
79 305
90 58cc centerbolt 305 Heads (TBI)
88 Monte Carlo 4bbl intake and carb
Stock Self aligning rockers
Goal 250-290 hp (enough to move along)
this is a budget build obviously
car will have headers with 1 5/8 in header primaries
2.5in custom exhuast with magnaflow muffler
here is the cam
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33614
270/280 duration
420/443 lift
204/214 duration @ .050"
112 lobe separation
do you guys think this will get me close?
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Car: cleanest '86 sport coupe around!!
Engine: 355ci twin 66mm turbos on e85
Transmission: built rmvb th400 w/ t-brake
Axle/Gears: 3.23
that cam will do well in a 305 but you migh want to look into induction and valvetrain to get the most outa that cam(heads,intake,rockers,springs etc.)
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: TBD
well intake is no prob niether are springs but rockers and heads are a higher dollar than the budget. unless you can suggest a "cheap" source i do mean cheap 250 left in the budget
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: Cypress,Tx
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
Try to find a set of used 416 or 601 heads. They can be had for less than $100. Get rid of those TBI heads they suck. Also go with the comp XE256 cam it is a very good cam for a mild 305. Worry about your intake a little later. If you need to pass emissions go with the ZZ4 and if not go with the performer RPM. Good Luck.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
Mildly ported 416 heads
Xe256h cam (110° LSA version)
ZZ4 intake
Edelbrock 600 cfm carb
That makes up the LG4 in my Caprice. I'm very happy with it for a daily driver.
Xe256h cam (110° LSA version)
ZZ4 intake
Edelbrock 600 cfm carb
That makes up the LG4 in my Caprice. I'm very happy with it for a daily driver.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: TBD
you guy are suggesting a larger cam
so how bout this one
306/306 duration
447/447 lift
222/222 duration @ .050"
114 lobe separation
1600-5200 rpm power range
likes headers
i'm trying to stay with these paritcular ones becuase of cost
here the kit for this one:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33614
124 and i can still go find a set of heads
change seals, springs and maybe valves myself.
so how bout this one
306/306 duration
447/447 lift
222/222 duration @ .050"
114 lobe separation
1600-5200 rpm power range
likes headers
i'm trying to stay with these paritcular ones becuase of cost
here the kit for this one:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33614
124 and i can still go find a set of heads
change seals, springs and maybe valves myself.
That cam looks like a turd to me. Notice the long advertised duration, and the short measured. Lazy cam, bigtime. Not to mention for that kind of duration it has a low amount of lift. When running with a carb, there are a lot better cams than that, thats for sure.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: Cypress,Tx
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
Originally posted by redcamaro83
you guy are suggesting a larger cam
so how bout this one
306/306 duration
447/447 lift
222/222 duration @ .050"
114 lobe separation
1600-5200 rpm power range
likes headers
i'm trying to stay with these paritcular ones becuase of cost
here the kit for this one:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33614
124 and i can still go find a set of heads
change seals, springs and maybe valves myself.
you guy are suggesting a larger cam
so how bout this one
306/306 duration
447/447 lift
222/222 duration @ .050"
114 lobe separation
1600-5200 rpm power range
likes headers
i'm trying to stay with these paritcular ones becuase of cost
here the kit for this one:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33614
124 and i can still go find a set of heads
change seals, springs and maybe valves myself.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I'll second IROCaholic's observations. Going cheap on the cam is penny-wise and pound-foolish. The Comp XE256, or a Crane Powermax 2040 would be much better choices.
Same on the heads. The TBI heads have no potential above what the factory did with them. 081's, 416's, 601's would be much, much better.
3" exhaust would also be better than 2.5".
Same on the heads. The TBI heads have no potential above what the factory did with them. 081's, 416's, 601's would be much, much better.
3" exhaust would also be better than 2.5".
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Shelbyville, IN
Car: 92' RS Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
vortec heads at the boneyard = cheap power - only kicker is you'll need a vortec intake which is going to be alittle more expensive then a standard gen I intake...
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: TBD
what cars/trucks has 601's and are they centerbolt?
is 350 after shipping decent for rebuilt 601s with new everything
is 350 after shipping decent for rebuilt 601s with new everything
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
There's no way in hell you're making that much power out of that short block with stock heads and no blower or nitrous. Forget it. It is not realistic. You'll be doing REAL good to get close to 250, with everything else PERFECTLY optimized.
601s are not center-bolt.
Chevrolet and other GM cars and trucks with 305s in the early 80s, any of them, might come with those heads.
If you want center-bolt heads, use 081 castings; off of 87-up LG4, L69, and LB9 305s.
The first cam you mentioned is a generic common aftermarket grind. It may get you to somewhere near 225 HP or so.
The second cam is a total POS. It's the old GM "151" cam. Stay as far away from that turd as you can get.
Don't cheeeeep out too bad. Think of it this way: if you can improve your fuel economy by 2 miles per gallon, let's say from 18 to 20 gallons, then 10 gallons will take you 180 miles, or 200 miles in the improved version. About one gallon every 200 miles difference. Within your first oil change, you will have made back the difference between a cheap cam and a good one, just in fuel costs.
Pick a cam that does what you want it to do; not the cheeeeepest thing you can find. It will pay you back REAL FAST. That $20 or whatever, will disappear in the mists of time, but you will put up with a car that doesn't run as good as it should or that uses too much gas, for maybe years to come.
601s are not center-bolt.
Chevrolet and other GM cars and trucks with 305s in the early 80s, any of them, might come with those heads.
If you want center-bolt heads, use 081 castings; off of 87-up LG4, L69, and LB9 305s.
The first cam you mentioned is a generic common aftermarket grind. It may get you to somewhere near 225 HP or so.
The second cam is a total POS. It's the old GM "151" cam. Stay as far away from that turd as you can get.
Don't cheeeeep out too bad. Think of it this way: if you can improve your fuel economy by 2 miles per gallon, let's say from 18 to 20 gallons, then 10 gallons will take you 180 miles, or 200 miles in the improved version. About one gallon every 200 miles difference. Within your first oil change, you will have made back the difference between a cheap cam and a good one, just in fuel costs.
Pick a cam that does what you want it to do; not the cheeeeepest thing you can find. It will pay you back REAL FAST. That $20 or whatever, will disappear in the mists of time, but you will put up with a car that doesn't run as good as it should or that uses too much gas, for maybe years to come.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: TBD
Originally posted by RB83L69
There's no way in hell you're making that much power out of that short block with stock heads and no blower or nitrous. Forget it. It is not realistic. You'll be doing REAL good to get close to 250, with everything else PERFECTLY optimized.
601s are not center-bolt.
Chevrolet and other GM cars and trucks with 305s in the early 80s, any of them, might come with those heads.
If you want center-bolt heads, use 081 castings; off of 87-up LG4, L69, and LB9 305s.
The first cam you mentioned is a generic common aftermarket grind. It may get you to somewhere near 225 HP or so.
The second cam is a total POS. It's the old GM "151" cam. Stay as far away from that turd as you can get.
Don't cheeeeep out too bad. Think of it this way: if you can improve your fuel economy by 2 miles per gallon, let's say from 18 to 20 gallons, then 10 gallons will take you 180 miles, or 200 miles in the improved version. About one gallon every 200 miles difference. Within your first oil change, you will have made back the difference between a cheap cam and a good one, just in fuel costs.
Pick a cam that does what you want it to do; not the cheeeeepest thing you can find. It will pay you back REAL FAST. That $20 or whatever, will disappear in the mists of time, but you will put up with a car that doesn't run as good as it should or that uses too much gas, for maybe years to come.
There's no way in hell you're making that much power out of that short block with stock heads and no blower or nitrous. Forget it. It is not realistic. You'll be doing REAL good to get close to 250, with everything else PERFECTLY optimized.
601s are not center-bolt.
Chevrolet and other GM cars and trucks with 305s in the early 80s, any of them, might come with those heads.
If you want center-bolt heads, use 081 castings; off of 87-up LG4, L69, and LB9 305s.
The first cam you mentioned is a generic common aftermarket grind. It may get you to somewhere near 225 HP or so.
The second cam is a total POS. It's the old GM "151" cam. Stay as far away from that turd as you can get.
Don't cheeeeep out too bad. Think of it this way: if you can improve your fuel economy by 2 miles per gallon, let's say from 18 to 20 gallons, then 10 gallons will take you 180 miles, or 200 miles in the improved version. About one gallon every 200 miles difference. Within your first oil change, you will have made back the difference between a cheap cam and a good one, just in fuel costs.
Pick a cam that does what you want it to do; not the cheeeeepest thing you can find. It will pay you back REAL FAST. That $20 or whatever, will disappear in the mists of time, but you will put up with a car that doesn't run as good as it should or that uses too much gas, for maybe years to come.
i've already decided to change heads
and go with the xe256 the big draw with those two cams was the included cam kit ie no other small purchases.
but i thank u guy for being realistic with me.
looks like the budget just went up just gotta add a month to the equasion
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: TBD
so basically i need to get 87+ tpi heads better intake (zz4) and the xe256
Last edited by redcamaro83; Nov 30, 2004 at 07:50 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: Cypress,Tx
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
Originally posted by redcamaro83
so basically i need to get 87+ tpi heads better intake (zz4) and the xe256
so basically i need to get 87+ tpi heads better intake (zz4) and the xe256
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
The ZZ4 intake won't bolt to the 87-up heads without modification. I've never done it personally, but the word is you elongate the center two mount bolt holes on each side of the intake so the bolts will fit in.
With the XE256 cam, you aren't going to be overwhelming the '88 intake manifold (if that's actually what it is - I didn't think GM made any carbs after the '87 model year). Gasket match the intake ports on the heads and manifold, and a stocker will do you just fine.
With the XE256 cam, you aren't going to be overwhelming the '88 intake manifold (if that's actually what it is - I didn't think GM made any carbs after the '87 model year). Gasket match the intake ports on the heads and manifold, and a stocker will do you just fine.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: Cypress,Tx
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
Originally posted by five7kid
The ZZ4 intake won't bolt to the 87-up heads without modification. I've never done it personally, but the word is you elongate the center two mount bolt holes on each side of the intake so the bolts will fit in.
With the XE256 cam, you aren't going to be overwhelming the '88 intake manifold (if that's actually what it is - I didn't think GM made any carbs after the '87 model year). Gasket match the intake ports on the heads and manifold, and a stocker will do you just fine.
The ZZ4 intake won't bolt to the 87-up heads without modification. I've never done it personally, but the word is you elongate the center two mount bolt holes on each side of the intake so the bolts will fit in.
With the XE256 cam, you aren't going to be overwhelming the '88 intake manifold (if that's actually what it is - I didn't think GM made any carbs after the '87 model year). Gasket match the intake ports on the heads and manifold, and a stocker will do you just fine.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: TBD
Originally posted by five7kid
I didn't think GM made any carbs after the '87 model year). Gasket match the intake ports on the heads and manifold, and a stocker will do you just fine.
I didn't think GM made any carbs after the '87 model year). Gasket match the intake ports on the heads and manifold, and a stocker will do you just fine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1988iroc350tpi
Tech / General Engine
8
Aug 14, 2015 07:52 PM






