Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Best carb heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 09:21 AM
  #1  
rcpilot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Central Cali
Car: 83 Camaro CMC#64
Engine: 305/Spec
Transmission: WC T-5
Best carb heads

Building a NASA CMC(Camaro Mustang Challenge) 3rd Gen... have to run a 305 and I'm going with the "Spec" setup...Holley 4776, Performer mani and cam kit... I need heads for this motor, what heads are the best for the carb setup, I was told the "081's" and the "416's" were TPI heads and they would not flow well w/carb setup. I really need the cast numbers if you have them...

Thanks folks.....
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #2  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Either of those heads will work fine. In point of fact, both of those castings were used on LG4s and L69s, as well as TPI. Not that the induction system has anything to do with whether the heads are suitable or not.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #3  
rcpilot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Central Cali
Car: 83 Camaro CMC#64
Engine: 305/Spec
Transmission: WC T-5
Thats what I thought, I was told to steer away from "Swirl Port" heads, so I did'nt know if those were swirls or not... I also noticed the "061's" were the same valve/cc's as the "461's".
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 10:05 AM
  #4  
Joel07's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
Car: 1989 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Been a while since I messed with 305 heads, but IIRC, the 434 and 416 heads were the carb'd heads with the 4 perimeter bolt valve covers (not centerbolt). I think the 416's had slightly bigger valves, but they were otherwise identical from the factory. I was running 434's on my 305 circle track car, but we were limited to a 1.76" intake valve, where the 416's had 1.84's.

Again, this is just going from memory, I could be wrong on this. But I'm pretty sure those two are the best flowing of the factory 305 heads.

Good luck with the CMC build, I'm getting ready to build one up myself, so I need to do some more research of my own!!!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #5  
rcpilot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Central Cali
Car: 83 Camaro CMC#64
Engine: 305/Spec
Transmission: WC T-5
Joel... thanks for the info... my brother is running a Mustang and I'm building the Camaro... strange team concept here.. There are only a few folks out west here running the "Spec" setup.. I'm very familiar with the Holley's thats why I'm going carb.. of course everyone is tryin gto get me to go TPI... but after watching the same TPI car die 3 races in a row with computer/module problems I like the carb approach...the TPI's are strong but they do have their probs...:
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 06:36 PM
  #6  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
The 434s were the old 305 2-barrel head from the late 70s. My 78 El Camino 305 2-barrel (120 HP or some such..... very very weak) has those.

The advice about swirlies is good; you definitely don't want those.

The 416 has the advantage of the early-model intake bolt setup. On the other hand it has perimeter valve cover bolts, which are more prone to leakage than the later style that the 081 has.

Other than that, they're pretty similar.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 08:20 AM
  #7  
Joel07's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
Car: 1989 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
I'm very familiar with the Holley's thats why I'm going carb.. of course everyone is tryin gto get me to go TPI... but after watching the same TPI car die 3 races in a row with computer/module problems I like the carb approach...the TPI's are strong but they do have their probs...:
Those are my feelings exactly, and why I decided to go the carb'd route. Keep it simple, stupid! is my principle to go by, and for me it's a whole lot easier troubleshooting a carb than a TPI. Too much to go wrong on race day.

I'll be tearing down a 305 that I've got here very soon, it's got the centerbolt heads, not sure what casting #, when I tear them down and check them out, I'll let ya know what I find. It came out of a TBI Caprice, so I'm not sure if it'll have the swirl ports or not.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 11:04 AM
  #8  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
It will.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 01:27 PM
  #9  
Joel07's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
Car: 1989 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
So then what did the 081's come on? 87+ Carb'd cars? I'm gonna guess that those'll be hard to find NOT cracked...
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #10  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
081s came on 87-up carbed and TPI cars.

Anything TBI, you don't want. They'll be swirlies. Guaranteed losers.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #11  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
601's and 461's are the pre '87 305 heads. They're good to use as well.
Surprised no one else mentioned this yet, look up sitting bull, he redid a set of 601s, and had a thread with something like 300 replies (you'll find it...), and it mentions a lot of this info...
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 03:15 PM
  #12  
Joel07's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
Car: 1989 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
601's and 461's are the pre '87 305 heads.
I think you mean 416's. 461's are the double hump 327 hi-po heads. Also 434's were used for the early 305's.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #13  
Joel07's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
Car: 1989 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...=601+305+heads

There's the thread on the 601's. One word of caution from someone who runs a machine shop though. Watch out for those 601's, as they are VERY bad about cracking. Get them checked and hot-tanked BEFORE you do any work to them. I've seen people do all that porting and polishing work, and then find out when they go to get the valve job done that the heads are cracked.

This really goes for any of the later 305 heads, they are thin-wall light-weight castings, and crack very easily. The only ones that aren't light-weight castings are the 434's, and they have the smaller 1.76" intake valves.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
midge54
LTX and LSX
21
Dec 27, 2019 04:14 PM
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Mar 5, 2017 06:37 PM
theurge
TPI
7
Aug 21, 2015 12:46 PM
86IROC112
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 17, 2015 02:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.