Carter m6626
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: auburn 4.10
Carter m6626
Just installed this pump. Thinking its going to keep up with 500-600 hp. Read several threads were this pumps 120 gph. Only $20 so I got one off ebay that said 120 gph/5.5-6.5 psi from summit racing. Today I looked on summits actual website and is only 40 gph. Called summit and they said its only 40 gph (slightly better than a stock pump). Did carter change this pump or has 120 gph been a misconception from the start?
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: Carter m6626
120 gph is huge. Probably been a misprint all along.
I had one on my ZZ4 clone, never had fuel delivery issues with it.
I had one on my ZZ4 clone, never had fuel delivery issues with it.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: auburn 4.10
Re: Carter m6626
It's a misprint. Summit and Jegs both say 40 gph. Jegs gave me carters # and they say 40 gph also. Now I gotta find another pump to keep up with my needs.
Thinking eddy victor 1711 130 gph with a mr. gasket return style regulator and be done with it. Those any good? alternatives?
Got 400 hp (+-50 hp) on motor and 150 shot nitrous
Thinking eddy victor 1711 130 gph with a mr. gasket return style regulator and be done with it. Those any good? alternatives?
Got 400 hp (+-50 hp) on motor and 150 shot nitrous
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bowdon, GA.
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
14 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Carter m6626
I really like to run a dedicated fuel system for nitrous above 75 HP.
2 gal. fuel cell mounted up front, Holley red or blue elec pump (depending on nitrous system) close to cell, fuel pressure reg., 3/8" or 1/2" fuel line to fuel solenoid
I run this mech fuel pump on my engine (500+ HP NA).. 172 gph http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Carter...-Pump,186.html
And planning a nitrous system for the future and with it I will be running like I said a dedicated fuel system for it... Even with the massive 172 gph pump.
I will run a 2 gal cell, Holley blue pump and reg., and will be running a NX 50-300 HP plate system
2 gal. fuel cell mounted up front, Holley red or blue elec pump (depending on nitrous system) close to cell, fuel pressure reg., 3/8" or 1/2" fuel line to fuel solenoid
I run this mech fuel pump on my engine (500+ HP NA).. 172 gph http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Carter...-Pump,186.html
And planning a nitrous system for the future and with it I will be running like I said a dedicated fuel system for it... Even with the massive 172 gph pump.
I will run a 2 gal cell, Holley blue pump and reg., and will be running a NX 50-300 HP plate system
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: auburn 4.10
Re: Carter m6626
I thought about a dedicated fuel system just for the nitrous using a electric pump. I wonder if I could tap into the mechanical pumps return line with a tee fitting for the electric pump. Instead of a fuel cell.
#6
Supreme Member
Re: Carter m6626
Jegs and Summit say one thing (40 gph). A half a dozen sites say another (120 gph). Carter's site has no spec on it.
I picked one of these pumps up based on two things. The gph numbers, which were listed at 120 gph and the return line to the tank. Seems that dead -heading a mechanical pump is not necessarily the best thing to do if you want to avoid vapour issues.
I haven't installed this unit yet as I'm still working on the return line, however, if all goes well, I'll have back to back tests between this Carter and the Edelbrock 110 gph pump I'm currently using. The latter is providing nearly zero pressure at the top end of the strip and I hardly think that a mid 12 second car (at 3700 lbs) is going to consume that amount of fuel.
I'll post up with results in a couple of weeks (I hope).
I picked one of these pumps up based on two things. The gph numbers, which were listed at 120 gph and the return line to the tank. Seems that dead -heading a mechanical pump is not necessarily the best thing to do if you want to avoid vapour issues.
I haven't installed this unit yet as I'm still working on the return line, however, if all goes well, I'll have back to back tests between this Carter and the Edelbrock 110 gph pump I'm currently using. The latter is providing nearly zero pressure at the top end of the strip and I hardly think that a mid 12 second car (at 3700 lbs) is going to consume that amount of fuel.
I'll post up with results in a couple of weeks (I hope).
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: auburn 4.10
Re: Carter m6626
Jegs and Summit say one thing (40 gph). A half a dozen sites say another (120 gph). Carter's site has no spec on it.
I picked one of these pumps up based on two things. The gph numbers, which were listed at 120 gph and the return line to the tank. Seems that dead -heading a mechanical pump is not necessarily the best thing to do if you want to avoid vapour issues.
I haven't installed this unit yet as I'm still working on the return line, however, if all goes well, I'll have back to back tests between this Carter and the Edelbrock 110 gph pump I'm currently using. The latter is providing nearly zero pressure at the top end of the strip and I hardly think that a mid 12 second car (at 3700 lbs) is going to consume that amount of fuel.
I'll post up with results in a couple of weeks (I hope).
I picked one of these pumps up based on two things. The gph numbers, which were listed at 120 gph and the return line to the tank. Seems that dead -heading a mechanical pump is not necessarily the best thing to do if you want to avoid vapour issues.
I haven't installed this unit yet as I'm still working on the return line, however, if all goes well, I'll have back to back tests between this Carter and the Edelbrock 110 gph pump I'm currently using. The latter is providing nearly zero pressure at the top end of the strip and I hardly think that a mid 12 second car (at 3700 lbs) is going to consume that amount of fuel.
I'll post up with results in a couple of weeks (I hope).
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Re: Carter m6626
(I'm also out of town for a couple of weeks so it's all on hold).
#9
Supreme Member
Re: Carter m6626
Fuel pressure at idle and normal cruise is 7 psi.
Now the odd thing is what happens as the rpms rise as during a WOT blast.
Pressure drops to around 1-2 psi and will slowly recover. I have to limit the upper end of the test due to speed so I can't say if would rebound completely.
The problem I had with the earlier Edlelbrock was almost zero fuel pressure at the top end of the drag strip. I put that down to a vapour issue as it only happened at the track after an heat soak cycle or two. Now I can't say for certain what was going on.
The Carter didn't do what I had hoped. In fact, the Edelbrock never had a pressure drop on the street so in that regard the Carter is worse.
Last edited by skinny z; 09-20-2015 at 09:00 PM.
#10
Supreme Member
Re: Carter m6626
Further to my last post.
I don't think the M6626 is up to the task of supplying enough fuel even for a modest build as my own.
Based on this simple formula and using a .5 brake specific fuel consumption (.5 lbs of fuel per hour per horsepower produced) as a general guide.
({your} flywheel hp x 0.5 BSFC / 6) = the GPH needed.
In my case, based on 400 CHP, then (400 x .5 BSFC/6) = 33.3 GPH.
The Carter has a 40 GPH rating based on zero PSI (free flow). Add 6-7 PSI to that and it can be seen that it would have a hard time delivering enough fuel. As witnessed by my failed experiment.
I don't think the M6626 is up to the task of supplying enough fuel even for a modest build as my own.
Based on this simple formula and using a .5 brake specific fuel consumption (.5 lbs of fuel per hour per horsepower produced) as a general guide.
({your} flywheel hp x 0.5 BSFC / 6) = the GPH needed.
In my case, based on 400 CHP, then (400 x .5 BSFC/6) = 33.3 GPH.
The Carter has a 40 GPH rating based on zero PSI (free flow). Add 6-7 PSI to that and it can be seen that it would have a hard time delivering enough fuel. As witnessed by my failed experiment.
Last edited by skinny z; 09-20-2015 at 09:06 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
firebird305
Carburetors
7
07-05-2001 09:26 PM
firebird305
Carburetors
3
07-04-2001 01:31 AM
firebird305
Carburetors
2
03-21-2001 12:56 PM