Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Carter m6626

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2015, 12:04 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
krisner89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: auburn 4.10
Carter m6626

Just installed this pump. Thinking its going to keep up with 500-600 hp. Read several threads were this pumps 120 gph. Only $20 so I got one off ebay that said 120 gph/5.5-6.5 psi from summit racing. Today I looked on summits actual website and is only 40 gph. Called summit and they said its only 40 gph (slightly better than a stock pump). Did carter change this pump or has 120 gph been a misconception from the start?
Old 08-13-2015, 06:12 PM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: Carter m6626

120 gph is huge. Probably been a misprint all along.

I had one on my ZZ4 clone, never had fuel delivery issues with it.
Old 08-17-2015, 08:12 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
krisner89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: auburn 4.10
Re: Carter m6626

It's a misprint. Summit and Jegs both say 40 gph. Jegs gave me carters # and they say 40 gph also. Now I gotta find another pump to keep up with my needs.

Thinking eddy victor 1711 130 gph with a mr. gasket return style regulator and be done with it. Those any good? alternatives?

Got 400 hp (+-50 hp) on motor and 150 shot nitrous
Old 08-18-2015, 12:01 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
Night rider327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bowdon, GA.
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Carter m6626

I really like to run a dedicated fuel system for nitrous above 75 HP.
2 gal. fuel cell mounted up front, Holley red or blue elec pump (depending on nitrous system) close to cell, fuel pressure reg., 3/8" or 1/2" fuel line to fuel solenoid

I run this mech fuel pump on my engine (500+ HP NA).. 172 gph http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Carter...-Pump,186.html

And planning a nitrous system for the future and with it I will be running like I said a dedicated fuel system for it... Even with the massive 172 gph pump.
I will run a 2 gal cell, Holley blue pump and reg., and will be running a NX 50-300 HP plate system
Old 08-18-2015, 03:58 PM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
krisner89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: auburn 4.10
Re: Carter m6626

I thought about a dedicated fuel system just for the nitrous using a electric pump. I wonder if I could tap into the mechanical pumps return line with a tee fitting for the electric pump. Instead of a fuel cell.
Old 08-19-2015, 09:43 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 9,139
Received 630 Likes on 531 Posts
Re: Carter m6626

Jegs and Summit say one thing (40 gph). A half a dozen sites say another (120 gph). Carter's site has no spec on it.
I picked one of these pumps up based on two things. The gph numbers, which were listed at 120 gph and the return line to the tank. Seems that dead -heading a mechanical pump is not necessarily the best thing to do if you want to avoid vapour issues.
I haven't installed this unit yet as I'm still working on the return line, however, if all goes well, I'll have back to back tests between this Carter and the Edelbrock 110 gph pump I'm currently using. The latter is providing nearly zero pressure at the top end of the strip and I hardly think that a mid 12 second car (at 3700 lbs) is going to consume that amount of fuel.
I'll post up with results in a couple of weeks (I hope).
Old 09-05-2015, 08:11 AM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
krisner89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: auburn 4.10
Re: Carter m6626

Originally Posted by skinny z
Jegs and Summit say one thing (40 gph). A half a dozen sites say another (120 gph). Carter's site has no spec on it.
I picked one of these pumps up based on two things. The gph numbers, which were listed at 120 gph and the return line to the tank. Seems that dead -heading a mechanical pump is not necessarily the best thing to do if you want to avoid vapour issues.
I haven't installed this unit yet as I'm still working on the return line, however, if all goes well, I'll have back to back tests between this Carter and the Edelbrock 110 gph pump I'm currently using. The latter is providing nearly zero pressure at the top end of the strip and I hardly think that a mid 12 second car (at 3700 lbs) is going to consume that amount of fuel.
I'll post up with results in a couple of weeks (I hope).
Have you got any results yet? Really curious how them two compare to eachother
Old 09-06-2015, 05:14 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 9,139
Received 630 Likes on 531 Posts
Re: Carter m6626

Originally Posted by krisner89
Have you got any results yet? Really curious how them two compare to eachother
Unfortunately, no. I was caught out by the different clocking of the inlet and outlet lines so I'll need to get a handful of AN fittings to make it all fit. As it is, it looks like the line to the carb will be hard into the lower rad hose. I won't know for sure until I have the parts.
(I'm also out of town for a couple of weeks so it's all on hold).
Old 09-19-2015, 12:45 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 9,139
Received 630 Likes on 531 Posts
Re: Carter m6626

Originally Posted by krisner89
Have you got any results yet? Really curious how them two compare to eachother
Installed and tested although not at the track.
Fuel pressure at idle and normal cruise is 7 psi.
Now the odd thing is what happens as the rpms rise as during a WOT blast.
Pressure drops to around 1-2 psi and will slowly recover. I have to limit the upper end of the test due to speed so I can't say if would rebound completely.
The problem I had with the earlier Edlelbrock was almost zero fuel pressure at the top end of the drag strip. I put that down to a vapour issue as it only happened at the track after an heat soak cycle or two. Now I can't say for certain what was going on.
The Carter didn't do what I had hoped. In fact, the Edelbrock never had a pressure drop on the street so in that regard the Carter is worse.

Last edited by skinny z; 09-20-2015 at 09:00 PM.
Old 09-20-2015, 08:56 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 9,139
Received 630 Likes on 531 Posts
Re: Carter m6626

Further to my last post.
I don't think the M6626 is up to the task of supplying enough fuel even for a modest build as my own.
Based on this simple formula and using a .5 brake specific fuel consumption (.5 lbs of fuel per hour per horsepower produced) as a general guide.

({your} flywheel hp x 0.5 BSFC / 6) = the GPH needed.

In my case, based on 400 CHP, then (400 x .5 BSFC/6) = 33.3 GPH.
The Carter has a 40 GPH rating based on zero PSI (free flow). Add 6-7 PSI to that and it can be seen that it would have a hard time delivering enough fuel. As witnessed by my failed experiment.

Last edited by skinny z; 09-20-2015 at 09:06 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skinny z
Carburetors
11
09-29-2015 11:25 PM
makaveli09
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
09-15-2015 10:43 AM
firebird305
Carburetors
7
07-05-2001 09:26 PM



Quick Reply: Carter m6626



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 AM.