Thermostat situation
Thermostat situation
I just read a tech article by William Weissman in regards to the cooling system. I put a 160 degree thermostat by Stant to supposedly make the car run cooler and at the same time had a problem with the egr solenoid and the catalytic converters. I got the egr solenoid and converters replaced. The car ran fine for 3-4 weeks, now it is starting to miss creating a steady spitting sound at idle and at low speeds also making the car shake inside. Do you think its the thermostat? If so, what temp. thermostat should I buy for the California region and will it cure the engine miss condition ?
Last edited by steve's Z28; Nov 10, 2003 at 10:46 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 1
From: Warrington, PA USA
Car: "02 z-28
Engine: LS-1
Transmission: 4L60E
The miss is something other than the stat temp. That being said and although I think ******* article is well written I do not agree with many conclusions about what temp the engine is happy. Prior to replacing my block in my 89 5.7 TPI I experimented with all different operating temps. In every case fuel economy suffered which translates into efficiency. While the ECM has some range to correct for variations in engine temp a 160 is just too cold. I found a 3-5 mpg loss with a 160. Also, I have a pipe sniffer and it always ran on the rich side with a 160 or 170 stat. A 180 would be a good choice if you want to go lower and would still keep you in the approximate range that results in best engine operation. Almost every gas engine out there runs at 195, a few have stock 180 stats and get well over a 100k miles and run well. I personally think engine oil temp is more critical than coolant which is why I run synthetic oil in all my cars. I run a zz-4 block with everything else stock with a 195. It meets emissions and gets 24-25 mpg on the highway in OD.
So installing a 180 degree thermostat won't cause the ECM to malfunction? The reason I ask is because plan to install either a 180 or a 195 degree thermostat. Anyone's response is appreciated. The engine in the car is a stock 350 tuned port motor.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 1
From: Warrington, PA USA
Car: "02 z-28
Engine: LS-1
Transmission: 4L60E
Not at all. The ECM can compensate for a 180, no stat temp will cause a failure of the ECM-the most that happens is gas mileage suffers a little.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 1986 Irocz
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.25:1
Originally posted by Danno
The miss is something other than the stat temp. That being said and although I think ******* article is well written I do not agree with many conclusions about what temp the engine is happy. Prior to replacing my block in my 89 5.7 TPI I experimented with all different operating temps. In every case fuel economy suffered which translates into efficiency. While the ECM has some range to correct for variations in engine temp a 160 is just too cold. I found a 3-5 mpg loss with a 160. Also, I have a pipe sniffer and it always ran on the rich side with a 160 or 170 stat. A 180 would be a good choice if you want to go lower and would still keep you in the approximate range that results in best engine operation. Almost every gas engine out there runs at 195, a few have stock 180 stats and get well over a 100k miles and run well. I personally think engine oil temp is more critical than coolant which is why I run synthetic oil in all my cars. I run a zz-4 block with everything else stock with a 195. It meets emissions and gets 24-25 mpg on the highway in OD.
The miss is something other than the stat temp. That being said and although I think ******* article is well written I do not agree with many conclusions about what temp the engine is happy. Prior to replacing my block in my 89 5.7 TPI I experimented with all different operating temps. In every case fuel economy suffered which translates into efficiency. While the ECM has some range to correct for variations in engine temp a 160 is just too cold. I found a 3-5 mpg loss with a 160. Also, I have a pipe sniffer and it always ran on the rich side with a 160 or 170 stat. A 180 would be a good choice if you want to go lower and would still keep you in the approximate range that results in best engine operation. Almost every gas engine out there runs at 195, a few have stock 180 stats and get well over a 100k miles and run well. I personally think engine oil temp is more critical than coolant which is why I run synthetic oil in all my cars. I run a zz-4 block with everything else stock with a 195. It meets emissions and gets 24-25 mpg on the highway in OD.
A very simple way to solve this problem is with aTricker Box so you can tell the ECM that it is normal operating temperature even if you're running 160*F or cooler.
This is very useful in cold climates when you are running a low temp thermostat for performance. The tricker box effectively leans out your A/F ratio to normal giving many benefits.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





