Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
Thread Starter
Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 1
From: Ga.
Car: 1986 Firebird, 1989 Vette, 1995 GP
Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
I had a custom chip done by a very knowledgeable gentleman several years ago, car ran perfectly for over 10 years. This wasn't an extreme change only the VATS, slight lowering of temp coolant fan, and a change of the cranking fuel injector pulse width for a quicker start. After this the car started up on the 1st or 2nd revolution and ran fine. Now, this is on a 1989 Corvette. Last year car would still start quickly, but sometimes it would die instantly. Re-start good and all was good. Then it started intermittently having a sharp quick "dead" bump" while driving at any and all conditions. After several months of checking and replacing some parts I removed the Moates adaptor and the chip. Put it back to stock configuration and have been driving some lately with no issues. Is it possible this chip has something degraded inside?
Thank you
Joel
Thank you
Joel
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,255
Likes: 427
From: Portland, OR
Car: 86 Imponte Ruiner 450GT, 91 Formula
Engine: 350 Vortec, FIRST TPI, 325 RWHP
Transmission: 700R4 3000 stall.
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Torsen 3.70
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
Unlikely to be the chip itself - more likely a bad contact between the chip and adapter, or the PROM socket on the board, etc. Try re-seating everything and checking carefully for poor connections or cracked solder, etc.
GD
GD
Thread Starter
Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 1
From: Ga.
Car: 1986 Firebird, 1989 Vette, 1995 GP
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
Thanks for the reply. I forgot to mention I did try a new adaptor a few weeks ago with the same results. I have re-seated everything several times and tried another ECM I have as a extra. Still the same issues when I use the piggyback chip and adaptor.
Joel
Joel
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,255
Likes: 427
From: Portland, OR
Car: 86 Imponte Ruiner 450GT, 91 Formula
Engine: 350 Vortec, FIRST TPI, 325 RWHP
Transmission: 700R4 3000 stall.
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Torsen 3.70
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
Still - I have never seen a bad 27SF512 like that. Doesn't seem likely. It could be that the difference in the tune is exposing some deficiency in the ignition system for example - simply because the timing and fueling are different between the two. If you lean out the mixture it might not ignite as easily and an enlarged plug gap, or poor wire/cap/rotor connection might become evident where it wouldn't with a richer mixture. You just can't rule out the tune changing the behavior of marginal components like that - especially when it's been in place for 10 years. Everyone is always too quick to blame the computer and it's usually not the problem.
GD
GD
Thread Starter
Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 1
From: Ga.
Car: 1986 Firebird, 1989 Vette, 1995 GP
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
Actually, the ECM/chip was the last thing I thought the problem was. I've been working on this for over a year when I had some spare time. It very well could be something I've missed. Other than the problems I described the car does run very well. No codes ever, nothing. I'm going to look around and try to find someone that will copy this chip, I assume that is possible? I do appreciate your time and replies. But I will take another look at all connections and the ECM's .
Thanks
Joel
Thanks
Joel
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,849
Likes: 1,011
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
I have had a few sst that go bad after the first use but very rare.
I never got the chips back to examine but the car went from running good to limp home and code 41 or 51.
Never seen data erase on a sst but have on a uv prom.
original multecs? Sounds like another issue other than prom.
your current chip can easily be read and saved to a bin and reburned.
I never got the chips back to examine but the car went from running good to limp home and code 41 or 51.
Never seen data erase on a sst but have on a uv prom.
original multecs? Sounds like another issue other than prom.
your current chip can easily be read and saved to a bin and reburned.
Thread Starter
Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 1
From: Ga.
Car: 1986 Firebird, 1989 Vette, 1995 GP
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
I have had a few sst that go bad after the first use but very rare.
I never got the chips back to examine but the car went from running good to limp home and code 41 or 51.
Never seen data erase on a sst but have on a uv prom.
original multecs? Sounds like another issue other than prom.
your current chip can easily be read and saved to a bin and reburned.
I never got the chips back to examine but the car went from running good to limp home and code 41 or 51.
Never seen data erase on a sst but have on a uv prom.
original multecs? Sounds like another issue other than prom.
your current chip can easily be read and saved to a bin and reburned.
Joel
Trending Topics
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,255
Likes: 427
From: Portland, OR
Car: 86 Imponte Ruiner 450GT, 91 Formula
Engine: 350 Vortec, FIRST TPI, 325 RWHP
Transmission: 700R4 3000 stall.
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Torsen 3.70
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
Send the chip to Tuned Performance and have him copy it to a new one. He's closer to you than I am and I don't know anyone else doing it these days.
GD
GD
Thread Starter
Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 1
From: Ga.
Car: 1986 Firebird, 1989 Vette, 1995 GP
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Car: 1987 Corvette Conv
Engine: Callaway Twin-Turbo
Transmission: Doug Nash 4+3
Axle/Gears: 3.07 Dana 44
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
I've seen this happen a number of times now, from a few Callaways to my guldstrand gs80. A few bits drop off the bin and read 'ff' or '00', I forget which. The way I've fixed them is to do a compare with a known stock binary that the chip is based off of, look for the dropped bits and substitute until the checksum doesn't change. Then you know you've gotten it right.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,849
Likes: 1,011
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
I’ve seen uv erasable flip a bit but not to blank FF.
good information
good information
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
This is a good reason why the checksum function of the firmware shouldn't be disabled. A lot of folks still do it.
RBob.
RBob.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,849
Likes: 1,011
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
Thread update: got the chip did a read and recreated changes made to arap . Checksum looks fine.
dont think there were any bit flips . Flow rate was slightly changed single and double fire but if edited with tunercat this happens not a drastic change in numbers. Did a fresh tune close to the one read fingers crossed solves issues.
dont think there were any bit flips . Flow rate was slightly changed single and double fire but if edited with tunercat this happens not a drastic change in numbers. Did a fresh tune close to the one read fingers crossed solves issues.
Thread Starter
Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 1
From: Ga.
Car: 1986 Firebird, 1989 Vette, 1995 GP
Re: Possible degrading of 27sf512 chip
Just a quick update: Received the new chip from Brian today. Very quick service from him. Car has been sitting for the last 3 weeks, temp today was approx 50*. After less than 2 revolutions engine fired right up with no problems. Had a good idle with no stumble. Drove car around for about 5 miles with no issues, but still need to get some more drive time before I put it all back together. Many thanks to Brian at Tuned Performance
Joel
Joel
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post










