help % change F/A VS. RPM. 730
help % change F/A VS. RPM. 730
I dont quite understand that table in 8D,
Im guessing that a negative number is taking % of fuel away.
Is that right?
And if thats true then it explains the negative numbers in the
AUJP BIN due to lack of effiency of a tuned port after 4200 rpm.
Another question about main spark rpm vs. load.
Your 6 degrees initial is not factored in correct?
So if under full load at a specific RPM i have 26 degrees
advance in my table then actual would be 32 degrees.
Is that also right.
Thank for all/any help .
Im guessing that a negative number is taking % of fuel away.
Is that right?
And if thats true then it explains the negative numbers in the
AUJP BIN due to lack of effiency of a tuned port after 4200 rpm.
Another question about main spark rpm vs. load.
Your 6 degrees initial is not factored in correct?
So if under full load at a specific RPM i have 26 degrees
advance in my table then actual would be 32 degrees.
Is that also right.
Thank for all/any help .
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 2
From: Fla
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: GMPP 93/4L60
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
Yep, thats the way they work...I wondered about the timing also before I started burning proms. After I could see the 6* being added back in on my scan tool. So yes you would have 32* total.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Re: help % change F/A VS. RPM. 730
Originally posted by 87_TA
I dont quite understand that table in 8D,
Im guessing that a negative number is taking % of fuel away.
Is that right?
And if thats true then it explains the negative numbers in the
AUJP BIN due to lack of effiency of a tuned port after 4200 rpm.
I dont quite understand that table in 8D,
Im guessing that a negative number is taking % of fuel away.
Is that right?
And if thats true then it explains the negative numbers in the
AUJP BIN due to lack of effiency of a tuned port after 4200 rpm.
Once you get the VE Tables were 128/128 perfect, then you would be needing to add fuel to attain 12.6-13.0:1 (rougly 10-15%). YMMV.
Read Traxion's post on "P730: Part throttle Tuning". Lots of great info there. Tim starts with a great way to get it farily close. And if you are a "fanatic", I mention a way to "fine tune it".
Last edited by Grim Reaper; Jun 22, 2002 at 11:57 AM.
Thanks alot guys ,
I really appreciate all the help here. I have read all of trax's work
and am following the steps but haveing a hard time right now.
I dont own a laptop currently and have done all my tuning via scan tool and worked great w/my MAF system but now that i converted to SD it seems i almost have to get one ...
Or a steady co-pilot that can write fast.
I really appreciate all the help here. I have read all of trax's work
and am following the steps but haveing a hard time right now.
I dont own a laptop currently and have done all my tuning via scan tool and worked great w/my MAF system but now that i converted to SD it seems i almost have to get one ...
Or a steady co-pilot that can write fast.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86CamaroDan
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 29, 2015 10:08 PM




