870 ECM and very rich idle
870 ECM and very rich idle
Tyring to help out a friend with his 85 Vette. He is running a Super Ram (no cold start injector), Accel 219 cam, 350 with L98 aluminum heads, and 24 pound injectors. His pretty much worthless Diacom data shows a BLM of about 114 - 118 at idle. It also shows zero spark advance which I thought was wierd. I sent him a new 85 bin with a little fuel taken out of the idle area in the MAF table plus programmed in spark advance tables from my $6E bin I was running with aluminum heads and similar cam. He claims performance is greatly improved but the idle is oscillating when cold and is so rich its literially choking him. I have heard that playing with the injector constant is trouble with this code. Tunercat and GMEpro display the injector constant as 15??? What is this about? His GMs per second at hot idle are about 9.
Anyone have any ideas what would be causing this rich idle? I would not expect a BLM of 114-118 to run that rich when cold the way he is describing. He has plans on upgrading to $6E code but I want to learn more about the 870 ECM.
Anyone have any ideas what would be causing this rich idle? I would not expect a BLM of 114-118 to run that rich when cold the way he is describing. He has plans on upgrading to $6E code but I want to learn more about the 870 ECM.
Re: 870 ECM and very rich idle
Originally posted by 89vette
Tunercat and GMEpro display the injector constant as 15??? What is this about? His GMs per second at hot idle are about 9.
Tunercat and GMEpro display the injector constant as 15??? What is this about? His GMs per second at hot idle are about 9.
The idle GM/sec of 9 is about right on the money.
Originally posted by 89vette
My point is that even the stock bins, GMEPro displays the injector constant as 15.
My point is that even the stock bins, GMEPro displays the injector constant as 15.
thats so funny about the injector constant. $1f doesnt use one its uses a table called
pulsewidth vs loadvalue
this table will show injector pulsewidth in usec vs LV8.
just look at it this way is its 1234 usec it really 1.234 millsec.,
also if its that rich might i suggest dropping the 0,16,32 lv8 usec values by say 7% or so. thats if the blm is reall 118-114.
peace otu it you need more help just email me. ive got alot of timie playing with this particualr code.
pulsewidth vs loadvalue
this table will show injector pulsewidth in usec vs LV8.
just look at it this way is its 1234 usec it really 1.234 millsec.,
also if its that rich might i suggest dropping the 0,16,32 lv8 usec values by say 7% or so. thats if the blm is reall 118-114.
peace otu it you need more help just email me. ive got alot of timie playing with this particualr code.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





