Wide band and Highwaymode :)
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 1
From: Grand Island, NY
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Wide band and Highwaymode :)
Well this WB is awsome!! Previous to the wide band I had set the AF in Highway mode to 15.4 and 4 deg of spark advance. Well after seeing what was happening with the WB (or should I say what was not happening), I really changed some of the values around to get it to AF in the 15.4 to 15.6 range.
Now I have the commanded AF set to 16 and 7 deg of advance and it is dialed right in!
I am curious to see what happens to my mpg. Hey, the dayton trip would be a great test!
For now I am going to stick with closed loop, when I get more experience I may tinker with open loop tune.
Now to work on the overly rich AF during PE
Now I have the commanded AF set to 16 and 7 deg of advance and it is dialed right in!
I am curious to see what happens to my mpg. Hey, the dayton trip would be a great test!
For now I am going to stick with closed loop, when I get more experience I may tinker with open loop tune.
Now to work on the overly rich AF during PE
Last edited by novass; Aug 13, 2003 at 04:47 PM.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: Wide band and Highwaymode :)
Originally posted by novass
Well this WB is awsome!! Previous to the wide band I had set the AF in Highway mode to 15.4 and 4 deg of spark advance. Well after seeing what was happening with the WB (or should I say what was not happening), I really changed some of the values around to get it to AF in the 15.4 to 15.6 range.
Now I have the commanded AF set to 16 and 7 deg of advance and it is dialed right in!
I am curious to see what happens to my mpg. Hey, the dayton trip would be a great test!
For now I am going to stick with closed loop, when I get more experience I may tinker with open loop tune.
Now to work on the overly rich AF during PE
Well this WB is awsome!! Previous to the wide band I had set the AF in Highway mode to 15.4 and 4 deg of spark advance. Well after seeing what was happening with the WB (or should I say what was not happening), I really changed some of the values around to get it to AF in the 15.4 to 15.6 range.
Now I have the commanded AF set to 16 and 7 deg of advance and it is dialed right in!
I am curious to see what happens to my mpg. Hey, the dayton trip would be a great test!
For now I am going to stick with closed loop, when I get more experience I may tinker with open loop tune.
Now to work on the overly rich AF during PE
Units respond differently to various inputs.
RBob.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by novass
I am using the DIY WB with the L1h1 sensor.
I am using the DIY WB with the L1h1 sensor.
Still a really decent tool for the cost.
RBob.
While on the subject, could anyone give me their thoughts on the following WB kits? I need one to use with my Holley Commander 950 setup. I desire a display as well as an output for the C950 ECU, simultaneous, of course.
1) FJO Inc (uses NTK WB 02 sensor)
2) techedge V2.0 (uses cheaper $100 or $35 VW-type Bosch WB O2 sensors)
I don't care about cost as much as I do service, proper calibration, reliability, etc. The TECHEDGE site did look rather good and I like the "synthesized liner output" feature of the new 2.0 version. Should give more resolution to the sensor output, i.e. usable AFR now over a wider voltage range.
Thanks, guys.
1) FJO Inc (uses NTK WB 02 sensor)
2) techedge V2.0 (uses cheaper $100 or $35 VW-type Bosch WB O2 sensors)
I don't care about cost as much as I do service, proper calibration, reliability, etc. The TECHEDGE site did look rather good and I like the "synthesized liner output" feature of the new 2.0 version. Should give more resolution to the sensor output, i.e. usable AFR now over a wider voltage range.
Thanks, guys.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: the garage
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by fast_broker
While on the subject, could anyone give me their thoughts on the following WB kits? I need one to use with my Holley Commander 950 setup. I desire a display as well as an output for the C950 ECU, simultaneous, of course.
1) FJO Inc (uses NTK WB 02 sensor)
2) techedge V2.0 (uses cheaper $100 or $35 VW-type Bosch WB O2 sensors)
I don't care about cost as much as I do service, proper calibration, reliability, etc. The TECHEDGE site did look rather good and I like the "synthesized liner output" feature of the new 2.0 version. Should give more resolution to the sensor output, i.e. usable AFR now over a wider voltage range.
Thanks, guys.
While on the subject, could anyone give me their thoughts on the following WB kits? I need one to use with my Holley Commander 950 setup. I desire a display as well as an output for the C950 ECU, simultaneous, of course.
1) FJO Inc (uses NTK WB 02 sensor)
2) techedge V2.0 (uses cheaper $100 or $35 VW-type Bosch WB O2 sensors)
I don't care about cost as much as I do service, proper calibration, reliability, etc. The TECHEDGE site did look rather good and I like the "synthesized liner output" feature of the new 2.0 version. Should give more resolution to the sensor output, i.e. usable AFR now over a wider voltage range.
Thanks, guys.
BW
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by fast_broker
While on the subject, could anyone give me their thoughts on the following WB kits? I need one to use with my Holley Commander 950 setup. I desire a display as well as an output for the C950 ECU, simultaneous, of course.
1) FJO Inc (uses NTK WB 02 sensor)
2) techedge V2.0 (uses cheaper $100 or $35 VW-type Bosch WB O2 sensors)
I don't care about cost as much as I do service, proper calibration, reliability, etc. The TECHEDGE site did look rather good and I like the "synthesized liner output" feature of the new 2.0 version. Should give more resolution to the sensor output, i.e. usable AFR now over a wider voltage range.
Thanks, guys.
While on the subject, could anyone give me their thoughts on the following WB kits? I need one to use with my Holley Commander 950 setup. I desire a display as well as an output for the C950 ECU, simultaneous, of course.
1) FJO Inc (uses NTK WB 02 sensor)
2) techedge V2.0 (uses cheaper $100 or $35 VW-type Bosch WB O2 sensors)
I don't care about cost as much as I do service, proper calibration, reliability, etc. The TECHEDGE site did look rather good and I like the "synthesized liner output" feature of the new 2.0 version. Should give more resolution to the sensor output, i.e. usable AFR now over a wider voltage range.
Thanks, guys.
If you are starting fresh (no sensor yet) get the unit from Innovate Motorsports: http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/
These guys are the on the ball. A really nice unit with good engineering behind it. It comes with a Bosch sensor included in the price.
As far as the Techedge, what a POS. I've seen the design, scary stuff.
RBob.
Trending Topics
You have USED the innovativemotorsports unit??? Does it work well? Anyone used it to supply a stand-alone EFI (Holley, DFI, etc.) a WB signal?
Seems like a very reasonable price. Uses the cheaper Bosch sensor, too, eh? I hope it is acurate enough. I really wanted a stand-alone display that I could mount somewhere in sight. But, this unit could be moved from vehicle to vehicle, which I am quite sure will happen...
Seems like a very reasonable price. Uses the cheaper Bosch sensor, too, eh? I hope it is acurate enough. I really wanted a stand-alone display that I could mount somewhere in sight. But, this unit could be moved from vehicle to vehicle, which I am quite sure will happen...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
no green
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
Jan 9, 2016 09:22 PM




