zero out table 2
zero out table 2
OK.
i am zeroing out on table 2 cept in 0 map and 3200 and above. now i am wondering when i tune table #1 is it necessary to use a fractional decimal? like 38.8? seems 39 would be close enough and make calculations easier. i seldom ever hit 128 on button every time on my logging data just occasional. seems like i am making more math more complicated than necessaryl
i am zeroing out on table 2 cept in 0 map and 3200 and above. now i am wondering when i tune table #1 is it necessary to use a fractional decimal? like 38.8? seems 39 would be close enough and make calculations easier. i seldom ever hit 128 on button every time on my logging data just occasional. seems like i am making more math more complicated than necessaryl
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: zero out table 2
Originally posted by Ronny
OK.
i am zeroing out on table 2 cept in 0 map and 3200 and above. now i am wondering when i tune table #1 is it necessary to use a fractional decimal? like 38.8? seems 39 would be close enough and make calculations easier. i seldom ever hit 128 on button every time on my logging data just occasional. seems like i am making more math more complicated than necessaryl
OK.
i am zeroing out on table 2 cept in 0 map and 3200 and above. now i am wondering when i tune table #1 is it necessary to use a fractional decimal? like 38.8? seems 39 would be close enough and make calculations easier. i seldom ever hit 128 on button every time on my logging data just occasional. seems like i am making more math more complicated than necessaryl
If your running with 2-3% your close.
Close is fine, the software can exceed the hardware, for accuracy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86CamaroDan
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 29, 2015 10:08 PM
