DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

$58 Frequently Asked Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2003, 10:31 PM
  #1  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
$58 Frequently Asked Questions

From the past few days of searches, reading the Sunbird Dox, reading the hack, digging into the TDF (tunercat) and ecu (winbin + everything else), and finally taking lots and lots of notes.. I've come up with a list of questions I've seen asked quite a bit, and that I've considered myself.

This isn't the end all, but if it saves someone research time then I guess I gave something back. Right?

<hr>


Q: What do I need to do if I want to run $58 code on my $8D (1227730 setup)
A: Repin the following harness connectors AT THE ECM:

730 ECM -------749 ECM

A8------------->A9 (ALDL data - Not needed to move though)
C1------------->B12 (VSS output for cruise - Not needed)
C11------------>C12 (Injectors 1,3,5,7)
C12------------>C11 (Injectors 2,4,6,8)
D6-------------->C13 (Injector ground)
E3-------------->E4 (IAC coil A high)
E4-------------->E3 (IAC coil A low)
E5-------------->E6 (IAC coil B high)
E6-------------->E5 (IAC coil B low)
F1-------------->F4 (shift light) for manual trans
F2-------------->disconnect (AIR pump solenoid)
F6-------------->F4 (TCC) for automatic trans


Next replace your 1 bar map with a 2 bar sensor and connector. (GM # 16009886, or Wells Su-129)

Finally, download a $58 bin file and start making the appropriate changes. You can re-use your memcal. Note: $58 bins are 16k, so you’ll need to double it to make it work.


Q: Do I need a 1227749 ecm?
A: No, the 1227730 will run the $58 code just fine. You won't need the extra
injector drivers the 1227749 offers.

Q: What “does not” work on $58, and whats different from $8D
A: Injector constant doesn't do a thing, egr is broke on 8 cyl, charcoal canister purge doesn't
work, AIR pump diverter relays do nothing, there is no engine cyl. vol. constant.
Additionally, the fueling code is based on BPC/BPW funtions vs
ideal gas law math on $8D. $8D is a lot more "refined" on a N/A setup, but obviously after 100kpa it
is useless.

Q: What should I use to edit the $58 bins with?
A: sy-ty users recommend "Programmer 98". I'm using tunercat and Programmer. Most any editor
should work fine. Programmer is the most complete, but also ugly.

Q: If the injector constant doesn’t do anything, how do I change injector pw?
A: In the entry "BPC vs desired EGR". Stock entries are typically .09 in Tunercat.
The higher the BPC, the larger the pw will be.

The correct formula is: BPC = 730.75 * (vol of 1 cyl / inj flow in gms per sec)

The code then multiplies the BPC by 12 additional perimeters to get BPW.

Q: I'm using an MSD BTM to take out spark under boost, how does this differ?
A: $58 has a spark table from 30-190kpa. You simply fine tune your spark advance
to your engines requirements, rather than taking out 1d per psi, and so on.

Q: I'm using an FMU to increase fuel pressure under boost, how does this differ?
A: $58 uses a "BPW boost multiplier" table to add fuel under boost. It goes from
90-190kpa. There is also a VE adder table for RPM that effects fueling.

Q: Does "power enrichment" work on $58 code?
A: Yes. "PE tps threshold" is at 0x0387, and defaults to 62.50% tps. It disables PE at 0x0382, defaults 94.7kpa. There is also a low RPM, and high RPM threshold. (0x37E, 0x37F).

Q: What about AE?
A: AE is bloated in $58. I had to reduce all my AE TPS areas down
to the 300s otherwise I got a rich bog.

Q: Where is "Initial Spark Advance" in the bin?
A: In tunercat it’s labeled “Spark Reference Angle”, address 0x000E (KREFANGL)

Q: Is the Fan request switch normally open or Normally closed?
A: Normally open, according to the Sunbird-P4 docs

Q: Is Optical or Magnetic Or Both VSS available?
A: $58 can use both. There does not seem to be speedo
gauge correction however.

Q: Does $58 use synchronous or Quasi-asynchronous injector pulses?
A: Both, depending on pw. If pw becomes too short, $58 code switches
to quasi. Generally Quasi is allowed anything < 7mph.

Q: Will emissions be the same with $58 as it was with $8D
A: NO! The EGR will not function. Most importantly, the AIR diverter
relays will not work either. Perhaps someone will be kind and
import the code from $8D to enable the solenoids.

Q: Does the 749 have code to control maximum boost level via a wastegate actuator?
A: YES! the 749 code has functionality to operate a wastegate
for max boost relief.

<hr>

Last edited by anesthes; 05-05-2004 at 10:26 AM.
Old 12-06-2003, 11:30 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Q: Does "power enrichment" work on $58 code?


YES there is a PE enrchment TPS threshold. bascially you have to reach x amount of TPS % to enable the PE mode.

Secondly the PE mode is brought on by the amount of MAP KPA. there is also a table to set up the TPS vs MAP KPA to being PE mode.

thats helpful enough ?
Old 12-06-2003, 11:40 PM
  #3  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
YES there is a PE enrchment TPS threshold. bascially you have to reach x amount of TPS % to enable the PE mode.
Found it, and edited above post..

-- Joe

Last edited by anesthes; 12-07-2003 at 12:46 AM.
Old 12-07-2003, 12:01 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i know its in both programmer98 and tunercat. im not sure if im mixing codes with the 2d table but i knw there are contatns for both enables. ill have to check my not and get back to you in the morning. if i dont im sure bruce or rbob will pop in and clear ths up for sure.
Old 12-07-2003, 01:20 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Tony89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
Re: $58 Frequently Asked Questions

Nice work in putting everything together, should be helpful when I convert over to the $58 code this winter.

But I got one question for ya

Originally posted by anesthes
Q: Does $58 use synchronous or Quasi-asynchronous injector pulses?
A: Both, depending on pw. If pw becomes too short, $58 code switches to quasi.
Think you could give a brief description of what this means, thanks.
Old 12-07-2003, 04:20 AM
  #6  
Member

 
JohnL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neat post.

Does the 749 have code to control maximum boost level via a wastegate actuator?

John
Old 12-07-2003, 08:50 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: $58 Frequently Asked Questions

Originally posted by anesthes
From the past few days of searches, reading the Sunbird Dox, reading the hack, digging into the TDF (tunercat) and ecu (winbin + everything else), and finally taking lots and lots of notes.. I've come up with a list of questions I've seen asked quite a bit, and that I've considered myself.


<hr>




Q: Does $58 use synchronous or Quasi-asynchronous injector pulses?
A: Both, depending on pw. If pw becomes too short, $58 code switches
to quasi.

<hr>

Yes there are quasi and asycn fuel modes on the $58 code. there a miniumus and maximums in the constants section.,

to answer the other question its about ijector firing times. with big injecors its really simple to just fire them less often. Becuase in a satturated injector you cant stabily fire a injector les then 2.2 msec and in a p/h arrangment you can only fire them for 1.5 msec. i you PW needs to be shorter firing the injectors less often and primarily towards idle make it easir to lean the idle out.

Quasi syncronos fire every 10-12.5 msec or at a maxiumum of 2 ref pulese. which ever is shorter.Quasi mode will add up sevral short calculated async events then fire all the injectors half as often but typically twice as long. This make acieving a proper AFR at ile with big like ( 55pph on a honda 2.0 4cyl etc ) alot simpler.


Asycn fueling fires at every ref pulse or 2 time every crankshaft revolution.in a 4cylinder or 4 time on a v8 or 3x on a v6 etc etc etc


any questions ?

Last edited by funstick; 12-07-2003 at 08:55 AM.
Old 12-08-2003, 06:54 AM
  #8  
Member
 
LBSZ28BLOWN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Keller, Texas, USA
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Devastating Droptop
Engine: 355 Supercharged
Transmission: Auto 4L60, Built for 700hp

730 ECM -------749 ECM

A8------------->A9 (ALDL data)
C1------------->B12 (VSS output for cruise)
C11------------>C12 (Injectors 1,3,5,7)
C12------------>C11 (Injectors 2,4,6,8)
D6-------------->C13 (Injector ground)
E3-------------->E4 (IAC coil A high)
E4-------------->E3 (IAC coil A low)
E5-------------->E6 (IAC coil B high)
E6-------------->E5 (IAC coil B low)
F1-------------->F4 (shift light) for manual trans
F2-------------->disconnect (AIR pump solenoid)
F6-------------->F4 (TCC) for automatic trans

Next replace your 1 bar map with a 2 bar sensor and connector. (GM # 16009886)


I'm just starting with the $58 code in a 730ecm.
Question:
The above, is that repining to convert to from a 730ecm to a 749ecm.
or are thoses the pins that need to be changed to run the $58
mask in a 730ecm.
Just checking, I thought someone said only one pin needed to be changed for this.
Old 12-08-2003, 07:12 AM
  #9  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
I'm just starting with the $58 code in a 730ecm.
Question:
The above, is that repining to convert to from a 730ecm to a 749ecm.
or are thoses the pins that need to be changed to run the $58
mask in a 730ecm.
Just checking, I thought someone said only one pin needed to be changed for this.
The 730 and 749 are almost the same. Close enough to be the same for this application. The repinning is because the $58 code outputs those devices (injectors, iac) on different pins than the $8D code does.

Someone could prolly change the code to work as the $8D, but noone has considered it I think. I havn't looked close enough at the two, but I think it would be fairly simple to do.'

Which leaves an interesting question.. Anyone think its a good idea to modify the code to work native in 730 without repin?

-- Joe
Old 12-08-2003, 12:08 PM
  #10  
Member

 
YenkoZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI under 14 psi
Transmission: aftermarket T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt 3.08 gears
Why go to all that work modding the .bin when you can swap the pins around in 2 minutes? Just doesn't make much sense.
Old 12-08-2003, 12:20 PM
  #11  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
I wonder how much work it is in the bin.

As far as pin swapping goes, these swaps make no sense as far as I'm concerned. I'm looking at the schematics for the 749 and the 730.

On the 749 schematic:



C10 Injector Driver
C11 Injector Driver
C12 Not used (??)
C13 Injector Jumper (ground??)

E3 IAC A High
E4 IAC A Low
E5 IAC B High
E6 IAC B Low


On the 730 schematic:

C10 NOT USED
C11 Injectors 1,3,5,7
C12 Injectors 2,4,6,8

E3 IAC A High
E4 IAC A Low
E5 IAC B High
E6 IAC B Low

D6 Injector Ground


Now I can see maybe why the injectors get flipped around, but I DO NOT understand why your suposed to mess with the IAC. It looks like the IAC is the same. Wtf?

-- Joe
Old 12-08-2003, 01:11 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
SATURN5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by anesthes



Now I can see maybe why the injectors get flipped around, but I DO NOT understand why your suposed to mess with the IAC. It looks like the IAC is the same. Wtf?

-- Joe

I talked with Bruce reguarding this, and it seems that IACs are not wired all the same.

The 749 swap is a hit or miss with the IAC, either it works out of the box, or it is buggered. The fix is simple, just swap the pins from coil A to coil B and so forth. What happens is the ECM signals to close the IAC, and it opens, and vice versa.

BW
Old 12-08-2003, 01:21 PM
  #13  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
I talked with Bruce reguarding this, and it seems that IACs are not wired all the same.

The 749 swap is a hit or miss with the IAC, either it works out of the box, or it is buggered. The fix is simple, just swap the pins from coil A to coil B and
That is interesting. Which way is yours?

-- Joe
Old 12-09-2003, 07:22 PM
  #14  
Member
 
LBSZ28BLOWN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Keller, Texas, USA
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Devastating Droptop
Engine: 355 Supercharged
Transmission: Auto 4L60, Built for 700hp
What $58 .bin file should be used to run in the 730ecm.

Is there more than one .bin for the $58 mask, if so is one preferred over the others.
Old 12-09-2003, 07:42 PM
  #15  
Member

 
YenkoZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI under 14 psi
Transmission: aftermarket T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt 3.08 gears
It really doesn't matter which one you use, since any of them will need to be modified to run the V8. BBZB is the latest update for the application though and is probably the easiest to find.
Old 12-09-2003, 07:43 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by SATURN5
I talked with Bruce reguarding this, and it seems that IACs are not wired all the same.

The 749 swap is a hit or miss with the IAC, either it works out of the box, or it is buggered. The fix is simple, just swap the pins from coil A to coil B and so forth. What happens is the ECM signals to close the IAC, and it opens, and vice versa.

BW

Thats insane. if you follow the schematic your IAC works just fine. the difference is in the control code. ad the Quad drivers are controller by the MCU which is instructed by the CODE. if built a bunch of scratch $58 harness using the 749 727 and 730 and never once have i had trouble with the IAC.
Old 12-10-2003, 05:41 AM
  #17  
Member

 
JohnL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by LBSZ28BLOWN
What $58 .bin file should be used to run in the 730ecm.

Is there more than one .bin for the $58 mask, if so is one preferred over the others.
There is an AYBN hac for the $58 mask. That may be a reason to start with AYBN.

John
Old 12-10-2003, 06:01 AM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
SATURN5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by funstick
Thats insane. if you follow the schematic your IAC works just fine. the difference is in the control code. ad the Quad drivers are controller by the MCU which is instructed by the CODE. if built a bunch of scratch $58 harness using the 749 727 and 730 and never once have i had trouble with the IAC.
Maybe you should look over a few wiring schematics... Not all IACs are the same.

Then maybe look up coils, solenoids and magnetic fields and how they operate. This is not a code issue.

You may have not had a problem with your swap, however Bort62 had to repin his IAC when he did this swap for a freind.

BW
Old 12-10-2003, 06:03 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
SATURN5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by anesthes
That is interesting. Which way is yours?

-- Joe
Since I went from a 165 harness to 749 the IAC was repinned to match the SyTy. BW
Old 12-10-2003, 07:08 AM
  #20  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Thats insane. if you follow the schematic your IAC works just fine. the difference is in the control code. ad the Quad drivers are controller by the MCU which is instructed by the CODE. if built a bunch of scratch $58 harness using the 749 727 and 730 and never once have i had trouble with the IAC.
I looked at the sunbird schematic, and I emailed Clint Buckalew, who did the pinout conversion that Bort and most guys follow. He said:

"Trust me on this one the schematics are wrong for the IAC. I wired it up like the schematics show and the IAC didn't work, so I had to flip them around to get it to work. As for the injectors if you see an injector jumper then your looking at the turbo sunbird diagram. The sy/ty uses only one of the injector drivers and the turbo sunbird uses them both. In either case they are still batch fire method. If you have a 90-92 fbody with the 730 wire up the vss like in the turbo sunbird diagram and wire the rest like the sy/ty unless you are using p&h injectors. Clear as mud eh."

I don't have the sy-ty schematic, but I'd love to see it.

What i'll do is leave the IAC alone, and start it, and if it doesn't work, i'll flip it around.


-- Joe
Old 12-10-2003, 01:14 PM
  #21  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Clint sent me the Syclone schematics. They ARE different than the '730, and Sunbird in regards to IAC..
Old 12-10-2003, 02:51 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I use a GM schematic. if your having IAC troubles then your using either a non standard GM IAC for the apllication or your using a chrysler IAC> but being an auto tech and changing lots and lot of GM iacs hel ive used chrysler IACS with $58 with no trouble i can tell you with a eat deal of certianty the issue is your schematic not the IAC>


BTW the code does dictate which way the coils are pulled and which way the IAC in terms of current polarity gets driven.

Open mouth insert foot. you did.
Old 12-10-2003, 03:52 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member

 
SATURN5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by funstick

BTW the code does dictate which way the coils are pulled and which way the IAC in terms of current polarity gets driven.

Open mouth insert foot. you did.

Pardon? Buggering the wiring will cause problems. The code only determines which one to pulse.
Reverse a IAC once.. and get back with me. BW
Old 12-10-2003, 05:44 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BOB its a stepper motor. striagth up. that means that depending on which coil is pulsed first will dictate direction. Its a code VS quad drive vs pinut issue. IF you use the correct pinout for your CODE then the quad driver will function the way the code instructs it to. The IAC is not a magic device with special propertys. If what you were saying was true then every time i chaged an IAC i would have to repin the ECM on even a basic repiar.

This if from the mouth of GM power trian enginer. if you wish to argue with the guys that design the hardware feel free. Also prtty much every IAC is the same electrically. chrysler IAC are the same as GM becuase there both made by the same supplier.
Old 12-10-2003, 06:29 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member

 
SATURN5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by funstick
BOB its a stepper motor. striagth up. that means that depending on which coil is pulsed first will dictate direction. Its a code VS quad drive vs pinut issue. IF you use the correct pinout for your CODE then the quad driver will function the way the code instructs it to.
Right...

I think we hit the same point, but were coming at it from different sides..

BW
Old 12-10-2003, 07:06 PM
  #26  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
The sy-ty schematic (thanks clint) says:

E6 IAC A High
E5 IAC A Low
E3 IAC B Low
E4 IAC B High

But the correct wiring for the sy-ty should be:

E4 IAC A High
E3 IAC A Low
E6 IAC B Low
E5 IAC B High

Injector's are not reversed, $58 just has them different.
On sy-ty schematic:

1,3,5 - C12
2,4,6 - C11

I don't know why GM has them in this order, or why the sy-ty schematic for IAC appears wrong but. ?

-- Joe
Old 12-10-2003, 09:59 PM
  #27  
Supreme Member

 
JP84Z430HP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Originally posted by funstick
BOB its a stepper motor. striagth up. that means that depending on which coil is pulsed first will dictate direction. Its a code VS quad drive vs pinut issue. IF you use the correct pinout for your CODE then the quad driver will function the way the code instructs it to. The IAC is not a magic device with special propertys. If what you were saying was true then every time i chaged an IAC i would have to repin the ECM on even a basic repiar.

This if from the mouth of GM power trian enginer. if you wish to argue with the guys that design the hardware feel free. Also prtty much every IAC is the same electrically. chrysler IAC are the same as GM becuase there both made by the same supplier.
I wondered about the Chrysler IAC's being the same. I thought they were, but never tried to swap one.

The code changes explain why I've seen the IAC wired differently for various applications that use the same ECM (730). I was looking at a J-body schematic and it was different than whatever other schematic I had lying here that was a 730 app.

How difficult would it be to change in the code? I may look into that for one of my projects I'm looking into where I may be running a few different masks.....
Old 12-11-2003, 08:25 PM
  #28  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
FYI.. tunercat emailed me a modified $58 def for working with 8cyl version. $58B they named it. If your a TC customer, email 'em.

-- Joe
Old 12-15-2003, 10:54 PM
  #29  
Member
 
LBSZ28BLOWN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Keller, Texas, USA
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Devastating Droptop
Engine: 355 Supercharged
Transmission: Auto 4L60, Built for 700hp
FYI.. tunercat emailed me a modified $58 def for working with 8cyl version. $58B they named it. If your a TC customer, email 'em.

anesthes ,
Whats the $58B do?
I looked at it and didn't see anything that stood out any different
then the $58.
Old 12-16-2003, 06:14 AM
  #30  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
When you change the cyl select to 8 cyls with the stock $58 TDF, everything based on RPM is calculated wrong in TC.

I.e, if you enter 10 in a field, it really is 9.8, and so on. This might not matter to some folks, but others would want the numbers to be right on.

-- Joe
Old 12-16-2003, 09:24 AM
  #31  
Supreme Member
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: $58 Frequently Asked Questions

Originally posted by anesthes

Q: Does $58 use synchronous or Quasi-asynchronous injector pulses?
A: Both, depending on pw. If pw becomes too short, $58 code switches to quasi.
From what I've run on the bench it seems to be synch, and asynch.
Synch meaning in relationship to a DRP, Distributor Reference pulse, and then asynch which means time based on 12.5 msec intervals.

So far I haven't heard of a solid explaination of quasi, and how it would in fact work. Other then the Sy Doc., and I wonder about it at times.

Otherwise seems like a, KEEPER.

Old 12-16-2003, 09:30 AM
  #32  
Supreme Member
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by SATURN5
I talked with Bruce reguarding this, and it seems that IACs are not wired all the same.

The 749 swap is a hit or miss with the IAC, either it works out of the box, or it is buggered. The fix is simple, just swap the pins from coil A to coil B and so forth. What happens is the ECM signals to close the IAC, and it opens, and vice versa.

They aren't wired into the system in the same way. IACs of the same series, are all the same other then the pintle.

Usually there is a difference when swapping from a C3 to P4 in the IAC pin outs.
Old 12-30-2003, 05:19 PM
  #33  
Member

 
JohnL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does the TCC lockup work on a '730 when you use $58 code if you connect (F6--->F4 (TCC)) as per the post by LBSZ28BLOWN above?

I raise this given RBob's comment in today's "703 = 749 (almost)" thread, that there is no TCC lockup driver on the '749.

John
Old 12-30-2003, 06:28 PM
  #34  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Does the TCC lockup work on a '730 when you use $58 code if you connect (F6--->F4 (TCC)) as per the post by LBSZ28BLOWN above?

I raise this given RBob's comment in today's "703 = 749 (almost)" thread, that there is no TCC lockup driver on the '749.
yes

Last edited by anesthes; 12-30-2003 at 07:27 PM.
Old 12-30-2003, 07:17 PM
  #35  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
whats the deal with $58 and VATS? it still work?
Old 12-30-2003, 07:22 PM
  #36  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
whats the deal with $58 and VATS? it still work?
No..

-- Joe
Old 12-30-2003, 07:31 PM
  #37  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
[/quote]
Does the TCC lockup work on a '730 when you use $58 code if you connect (F6--->F4 (TCC)) as per the post by LBSZ28BLOWN above?

I raise this given RBob's comment in today's "703 = 749 (almost)" thread, that there is no TCC lockup driver on the '749.
[/quote]

TCC Works on F4 on $58 as outlined in the schematic.

F4 on $8D in a '730 used to be AIR converter divert solenoid, which can drive TCC just fine.

-- Joe
Attached Thumbnails  Frequently Asked Questions-syclone_ecm_wiring_diagram2.jpg  

Last edited by anesthes; 12-30-2003 at 07:34 PM.
Old 01-01-2004, 12:45 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
This $58 talk is interesting to me, as I am/was planning on using this for my builds, my current one running in my S-15 and the one I will be building for my Sunbird, but after reading this thread it seems that there may be a problem with that, where the EGR is concerned. Around here, they are getting real sticky about emmisions controls on vehicles. If the vehcile was OEM eqquipped with that part it needs to be there, regardless of actual tail pipe emmisions.

So the $58 mask (Sy/Ty) does NOT use an EGR? If that is the case, what about starting with a 2.0L turbo .bin/mask (I don't know what mask that is), and modifying that? I will be running turbo V6s in both vehicles, hence why I was looking at using the $58 mask. I had considered using the TGP mask ($8D I believe), but I will not be running DIS in my Sunbird.

Or is the lack of EGR just when using the $58 mask in the 730?
I will be using a 749 if that makes a difference.

Last edited by The_Raven; 01-01-2004 at 12:49 AM.
Old 01-01-2004, 12:57 AM
  #39  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
This $58 talk is interesting to me, as I am/was planning on using this for my builds, my current one running in my S-15 and the one I will be building for my Sunbird, but after reading this thread it seems that there may be a problem with that, where the EGR is concerned. Around here, they are getting real sticky about emmisions controls on vehicles. If the vehcile was OEM eqquipped with that part it needs to be there, regardless of actual tail pipe emmisions.

So the $58 mask (Sy/Ty) does NOT use an EGR? If that is the case, what about starting with a 2.0L turbo .bin/mask (I don't know what mask that is), and modifying that? I will be running turbo V6s in both vehicles, hence why I was looking at using the $58 mask. I had considered using the TGP mask ($8D I believe), but I will not be running DIS in my Sunbird.

Or is the lack of EGR just when using the $58 mask in the 730?
I will be using a 749 if that makes a difference.
The problem I guess is EGR code doesn't work "correctly" on a 8cyl. I havn't tried it, I dunno if some people on here have.

More importantly, there is no air injection. So you'll either have to rig that up, or figure something else out.

-- Joe
Old 01-01-2004, 01:15 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Ok, so it seems to be the change from 6cyl to 8 cyl that messes with the EGR coding?

A.I.R. injection is not an issue, I won't be running that, and if I do need to add it back to my truck it's a passive system with no connections to the ECM.
Old 05-05-2004, 10:30 AM
  #41  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
I'm using $58 now on my boosted setup. There was some problems at first, and obvious differences in VE, and AE but I got it to the point where I think its driving nicely.

I'll post a link to my current bin, and scan here later.


-- Joe
Old 12-19-2004, 04:45 PM
  #42  
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
novass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grand Island, NY
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Re: $58 Frequently Asked Questions

Originally posted by anesthes


Q: What about AE?
A: AE is bloated in $58. I had to reduce all my AE TPS areas down
to the 300s otherwise I got a rich bog.

<hr>
is this the table you had to make all 300's
Attached Thumbnails  Frequently Asked Questions-ae.jpg  
Old 12-19-2004, 05:17 PM
  #43  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Re: $58 Frequently Asked Questions

Originally posted by novass
is this the table you had to make all 300's
It was access enrichment vs differential tps. I'm guessing thats the one.

This was for a TPI setup.

When I switched to singleplane efi, I put it all back up. haha.

I'm running $60 now, but most of the rules still apply.

-- Joe
Old 12-20-2004, 01:43 PM
  #44  
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
novass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grand Island, NY
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
After the conversion between 7730 to 7749, I have a question about ALDL mode with the $58. Is it necessary to use a 10k resistor between ports a and b on the aldl to enter the ALDL mode?

I had been reading Functional Features of the 1988 GM p-4 2.0 Turbo PFI System and it makes reference to enterin ALDL when a resistance of 10k is present see section 8.1.4.

For those that have done the swap, what have you found?

--Tom
Old 12-20-2004, 03:04 PM
  #45  
Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
RBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,400
Likes: 0
Received 215 Likes on 201 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by novass
After the conversion between 7730 to 7749, I have a question about ALDL mode with the $58. Is it necessary to use a 10k resistor between ports a and b on the aldl to enter the ALDL mode?

I had been reading Functional Features of the 1988 GM p-4 2.0 Turbo PFI System and it makes reference to enterin ALDL when a resistance of 10k is present see section 8.1.4.

For those that have done the swap, what have you found?

--Tom
To put the ECM into ALDL mode the 10K resistor is required (across pins A & B).

To put the ECM into Diagnostic mode short the pins A & B together.

To data log no need to place the ECM into any special mode. Leave pins A & B open.

RBob.
Old 12-20-2004, 10:08 PM
  #46  
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
novass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grand Island, NY
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Ok one more...

once again I am doing the swap from 7730 to 7749.

I notice that in the $58 that at position:

0x0334 magnetic speed sensor; that the value is disabled.

I know in my 7730 it was enabled, I am assuming that i need to switch the value.

Can anyone confirm?

Did the sy,ty use an optical sensor?

Also, How about the Road Speed sensor constant at 0x00f4 in the $58 it is 2000 to work with the one from the 7730 should it
be changed to 4000?

Last edited by novass; 12-21-2004 at 05:58 AM.
Old 12-22-2004, 07:28 PM
  #47  
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
novass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grand Island, NY
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
bttt
Old 12-23-2004, 07:33 AM
  #48  
Supreme Member
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by novass

once again I am doing the swap from 7730 to 7749.
I notice that in the $58 that at position:
0x0334 magnetic speed sensor; that the value is disabled.
I know in my 7730 it was enabled, I am assuming that i need to switch the value.
Can anyone confirm?
Did the sy,ty use an optical sensor?
Also, How about the Road Speed sensor constant at 0x00f4 in the $58 it is 2000 to work with the one from the 7730 should it
be changed to 4000?
The Sy's used a magnetic VSS, with a DRAC.
You can use either with the 58, magnetic or optical.
Yes, you'll need to change the constant going from magnetic to optical.
Old 12-23-2004, 09:30 AM
  #49  
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
novass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grand Island, NY
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Thanks once again. Grumpy
Old 05-13-2005, 06:29 AM
  #50  
Z69
Supreme Member

 
Z69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pasted from above for clarity.
730 ECM -------749 ECM

A8------------->A9 (ALDL data - Not needed to move though)
C1------------->B12 (VSS output for cruise - Not needed)
C11------------>C12 (Injectors 1,3,5,7)
C12------------>C11 (Injectors 2,4,6,8)
D6-------------->C13 (Injector ground)
E3-------------->E4 (IAC coil A high)
E4-------------->E3 (IAC coil A low)
E5-------------->E6 (IAC coil B high)
E6-------------->E5 (IAC coil B low)
F1-------------->F4 (shift light) for manual trans
F2-------------->disconnect (AIR pump solenoid)
F6-------------->F4 (TCC) for automatic trans

I was reviewing the 7730/7749 schematics on ~Ludis.
From what I can tell when running $58 on a 7730-

A8-doesn't matter, same signal on both pins
C1- I suspect this is more CC specific. C1 & B12 come from the same chip. Might need to experiment.
C11 & 12- doesn't matter on 7730
D6- C13 is a 7749 specific pin?, INJB GND.
IAC- when the people who've done it can't agree???
F1- This is the A/C control relay in a SyTy.
F2- This is WG control in a Sy Ty So disconnect it or hook it to your WG sol.
F6- Not used on a SyTy, so move to F4 if running a TCC

So it appears only 3 pins, F1,F2,F6 need to be moved. And maybe only F2 if you're lucky. A lot easier than I thought. Am I missing something?

edit: what about E9? EGR in 7730 and EVRV? wtf in 58.
E8 is Fan in 8D and CAC pump in 58.

Last edited by Z69; 05-13-2005 at 07:25 AM.


Quick Reply: $58 Frequently Asked Questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.