wideband question....this is an odd one....
wideband question....this is an odd one....
I have a 55,000 btu heater(i think). It accepts like 6 different type of fuels. I was wanting to se how clean each fuel burned. Maybe the wideband a/f meter would work?
Each fuel requires a different A/F ratio. So unless you know what each one requires. I know Nat Gas and Propane require different amounts of air. You have to change the "jets" out when switching a heater to get max efficiency I guess.
They make gas meters for checking furnace exhausts. Check Grainger's site.
They make gas meters for checking furnace exhausts. Check Grainger's site.
i have been burnbing field corn grade 3 for years. i often wondered if the air dampner was adjusted correctly in my model 1010 high efficiency corn dogger. thank you innovate !! i will report next week on damper settings as soon as i get the pipes unfrozen to the house. -30 below here in hurley wis!
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Al Udeid, Qatar-Worldwide service
Car: IH Scout
Engine: 345 V8 TBI
Transmission: 727
From experience I can tell you the JP-8 runs hotter and cleaner than the kerosene in the space heaters like the alladin blue flame.
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 462
Likes: 1
From: Ft. Leavenworth, KS
Car: 83 TA, 89 TTA, others
Engine: ZZ4 TPI, LC2 turbo v6
Transmission: several, mostly broken
Hehehe...see your local recruiter.
Used to be, we ran the M1 tanks on JP-4 (jet fuel), and pretty much all the other ground equipment burned No.2 Diesel. Helicopters and I think most jet aircraft were also using JP-4. Back about 1996 or so, both fuels were replaced by JP-8. It's less volitile than JP-4, so there's less chance of explosion in a crash or from enemy fire. Also from the Army side, it was a lot easier on us to only have to supply one type of fuel for the ground forces.
I don't know if civilian aircraft are currently using JP-8 or not. It would make a lot of sense from the standpoint of crash survivability. I suspect you could make a phone call to the fuel point at your local airport and find out.
When we first started running Diesel engines on JP-8, we had all sorts of problems with injector pumps -- seems that the cleaner-running JP8 fuel was breaking loose all the crud that had accumulated over the years of running Diesel fuel. We rebuilt a bunch of injector pumps, and replaced about a zillion fuel filters during the first year or so, but eventually the problem worked itself out.
Anyway, that's your military fuel trivia for the day.
Used to be, we ran the M1 tanks on JP-4 (jet fuel), and pretty much all the other ground equipment burned No.2 Diesel. Helicopters and I think most jet aircraft were also using JP-4. Back about 1996 or so, both fuels were replaced by JP-8. It's less volitile than JP-4, so there's less chance of explosion in a crash or from enemy fire. Also from the Army side, it was a lot easier on us to only have to supply one type of fuel for the ground forces.
I don't know if civilian aircraft are currently using JP-8 or not. It would make a lot of sense from the standpoint of crash survivability. I suspect you could make a phone call to the fuel point at your local airport and find out.
When we first started running Diesel engines on JP-8, we had all sorts of problems with injector pumps -- seems that the cleaner-running JP8 fuel was breaking loose all the crud that had accumulated over the years of running Diesel fuel. We rebuilt a bunch of injector pumps, and replaced about a zillion fuel filters during the first year or so, but eventually the problem worked itself out.
Anyway, that's your military fuel trivia for the day.
Last edited by Dave_Jones; Feb 3, 2004 at 07:25 AM.
Trending Topics
The heater has no adjustments for different types of fuel. That is why I want to test the effects of each type. I would imagine it would take only a few seconds to get a reading. So damage would seem unlikely. Would it work?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 27, 2015 01:30 PM





