DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

7747 Processor & ROMless ques.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #1  
brennanw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Citrus Heights, CA
Car: 1956 Willys
Engine: 383 TBI
Transmission: SM465
7747 Processor & ROMless ques.

After reading several of Grumpy's comments, I am finally convinced that I need to completely study and understand the source code running on my 7747. I found this statement on DIY-EFI "The '747 ECM uses a GM specific derivative of the Motorola 6809". What exactly is this "GM derivative" and where can I go to read about the assembly language used for this processor? I need some documentation that even a newb like myself can read.

Also, I'm very interested in eliminating the ROM code and running everything from the EPROM. I know that I will need to remove some things if I intend to retain my 2732 EPROM. The problem I have is that I don't believe that the hac I found contains the ROM code. Anyone willing to give me some pointers here?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 01:25 PM
  #2  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Look on the Motorola site for the 68HC11 manual. It keeps moving around so I can't give you a direct link. Appendix A has a chapter on the instruction set. The '7747 processor has a subset of that set. Can use the hac to see which instructions are valid.

The ASDZ hac contains both the EPROM & ROM code. It is 12KB is size, 4KB in PROM, 8KB in ROM. Only area in teh hac tha tis gooofy is the crossover point of $DFFF to $E000, the instructions are incorrect. Don't need to remove anything from the ECM, just ground a pin and the ROM is disabled.

RBob.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 02:02 PM
  #3  
brennanw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Citrus Heights, CA
Car: 1956 Willys
Engine: 383 TBI
Transmission: SM465
Originally posted by RBob
Look on the Motorola site for the 68HC11 manual. It keeps moving around so I can't give you a direct link. Appendix A has a chapter on the instruction set. The '7747 processor has a subset of that set. Can use the hac to see which instructions are valid.

The ASDZ hac contains both the EPROM & ROM code. It is 12KB is size, 4KB in PROM, 8KB in ROM. Only area in teh hac tha tis gooofy is the crossover point of $DFFF to $E000, the instructions are incorrect. Don't need to remove anything from the ECM, just ground a pin and the ROM is disabled.

RBob.
Thank you very much RBob. The ASDZ hac that I have is in PDF format. When I save it in TXT format, the file is still quite large. Is this because it has not been "assembled" yet? Also, would you care to explain "just ground a pin" a little further or pass along a link that explains this?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #4  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: 7747 Processor & ROMless ques.

Originally posted by brennanw
After reading several of Grumpy's comments, I am finally convinced that I need to completely study and understand the source code running on my 7747.
<Homer>
Ahhhh, Source code.
</Homer>

I'd tell what today's project was involving source code but then I'd have to shoot you.

Suffice to say, the MAT has become an extremely important sensor on my car.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 09:37 PM
  #5  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Re: Re: 7747 Processor & ROMless ques.

Originally posted by Grumpy
...but then I'd have to shoot you.
well... OK, but it better be good!
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 10:48 PM
  #6  
jeepguy553's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Rockport, TX
Car: 1980 Jeep CJ7
Engine: AMC 360 with GM TBI
Transmission: TF727 set for kill...let's get it on!!!
I hate that secret squirrel kind of crap! C'mon, Grumpy...cue us in...maybe even an appetizer of sorts.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #7  
JP84Z430HP's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
From: Johnstown, Ohio
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Re: Re: 7747 Processor & ROMless ques.

Originally posted by Grumpy
<Homer>
Ahhhh, Source code.
</Homer>

I'd tell what today's project was involving source code but then I'd have to shoot you.

Suffice to say, the MAT has become an extremely important sensor on my car.
I would love to have a clue as to what he's workin on, but I totally understand, and respect the reasoning for not letting stuff out into the wild.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 12:52 AM
  #8  
brennanw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Citrus Heights, CA
Car: 1956 Willys
Engine: 383 TBI
Transmission: SM465
Originally posted by brennanw
Thank you very much RBob. The ASDZ hac that I have is in PDF format. When I save it in TXT format, the file is still quite large. Is this because it has not been "assembled" yet? Also, would you care to explain "just ground a pin" a little further or pass along a link that explains this?
Anyone else care to comment on this?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 06:52 AM
  #9  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by jeepguy553
I hate that secret squirrel kind of crap! C'mon, Grumpy...cue us in...maybe even an appetizer of sorts.
There's a basic flaw in most of the management systems, IMO.
But, as long as your running the stock code, there's just not much you can do about it.

I've harped and harped about a source code project, and everyone has gone off in different directions, so nothing's happened. Or on the one minor effort they've picked the wrong code to even begin with. So as long as no one's really going to try and work out a community Source code project, then things will stay statis quo.

While having a hac is wonderful, having source code is incredible.
I'll admit, I'm kind of at the extreme for what I consider right, but it's just because, I've seen what correct is. It's really a shame that in the last 4 years things have stalled here. yes, the words out that the oem ecms are neat, and there's alot more activity, but there's room for more workers.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #10  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by brennanw
Anyone else care to comment on this?
It's not uncommon to have Source code that's 600K, to assemble into code for a 27128 sized prom. The size of the source code includes all the english comments, that aren't used in the .bin..
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 08:22 PM
  #11  
brennanw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Citrus Heights, CA
Car: 1956 Willys
Engine: 383 TBI
Transmission: SM465
Originally posted by Grumpy
It's not uncommon to have Source code that's 600K, to assemble into code for a 27128 sized prom. The size of the source code includes all the english comments, that aren't used in the .bin..
Ok, that makes sense. I'm also curious about that "ground a pin" comment. Do any of you know the specifics behind this?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 04:08 PM
  #12  
Ken73's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: 82 Corvette
Engine: 350 CrossFire
Transmission: 700R4
I believe (if I'm not mistaken, RBob, Grumpy, feel free to correct me) that you can pull all the address lines and data lines right off the 40-pin edge connector, as well as the ~ROMENABLE line, which is the line you'd ground to turn off the internal ROM.

You'd install a 27128 (or equivalent) with the actual code on it in the proper locations. (You'd have 4k leftover, actually; since the on-board ROM is 4k per chip, and there's two RAM/ROM/I-O chips.)

Best part of course, is you can change the code and make the ECM do what you want. Add a fan controller or who knows what!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #13  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Ken73 is correct AFAIK. I have a daughter board for the C3 ecm that does just this and converts the ecm to be romless. Only one wire needs to be soldered. Now that i have the image of the roms from my '8063 I can finally convert it over and get rid of the cancerous appendage that I soldered to it so I can use eeproms and replace it with one neat chip that has it all on board.

I started a thread on this over on the DFI/ECM board that goes over how to convert it over. Not too difficult. Thankfully, RBob was nice enough to tell us how to do it.:hail:
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 07:23 PM
  #14  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by dimented24x7

I started a thread on this over on the

DFI/ECM

board that goes over how to convert it over.
Which thread?.
At TGO?.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 08:06 PM
  #15  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Link


With the schematics its a good walk through on how to do it. Looks like it got a bump as well. Should be at the top of the message board.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 08:40 PM
  #16  
brennanw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Citrus Heights, CA
Car: 1956 Willys
Engine: 383 TBI
Transmission: SM465
Originally posted by dimented24x7
Link


With the schematics its a good walk through on how to do it. Looks like it got a bump as well. Should be at the top of the message board.
Thanks! That link is just what I needed. At this point it is quite a bit over my head but so was chip burning in the not so distant past. I'm looking forward to giving this method a try. Hats off to RBob.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 08:50 PM
  #17  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Very cool. Congrats and keep us updated on your progress.
Definatly get a test bench... it'll help a ton.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nsimmons
DIY PROM
3
Dec 3, 2001 07:43 PM
FastBroker
DIY PROM
11
Apr 2, 2001 07:59 PM
88TAGTA
DIY PROM
1
Mar 13, 2001 09:53 AM
CrazyRob75
Tech / General Engine
1
Feb 11, 2001 12:26 PM
tpic1500
DIY PROM
1
Jan 4, 2001 03:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.