DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Idles faster when ALDL is connected?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #1  
wwnf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: Indiana, PA
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: SC'ed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11 12bolt
Idles faster when ALDL is connected?

I've recently made an ALDL cable from specs found on this site and I'm using WinALDL to log data so I can start to understand things before I start tuning.

When I have the ALDL connected and logging data the engine idles 300 to 350 rmps faster than when I'm not in ALDL mode.

I reset my min air and checked my TPS and everything is good.

Is there something wrong or is this normal?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 01:33 PM
  #2  
AlexJH's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 1
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: 700R4
According to Vader:

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...+mode+ecm+idle

<I>A 10K ohm resistance in the diagnostic terminal to ground will invoke the factory End of Line Test Mode, or ALDL Mode. When the assembly line diagnostic mode is detected, the fuel logic will bypass the closed loop time criteria. The fuel logic will enter closed loop mode as soon as the coolant temperature and oxygen sensor thresholds are met. There will be no reset of the integrator function. The IAC will use the calibration memory table value corresponding to a battery voltage of 8 volts, bypass certain criteria for RPM closed loop enable, and bypass coolant restrictions for enabling IAC kick-down mode. The EST system will disable the Burst Knock logic and bypass the RPM and coolant temperature criteria for ESC retard enable. That will force the engine into a condition where spark knock should occur if the throttle is suddenly opened (Burst Knock). Additionally, if ALDL mode has been enabled longer than a PROM timer value, the timer will be removed from the spark advance calculation. The TCC logic will allow the TCC to be enabled sooner and without regard to the CTS input.</I>
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #3  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Iin other words, once your scanner is connected, remove the 10k resistor.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 04:31 PM
  #4  
Bluevette85's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Latham, NY
Car: 85 Corvette
Engine: 355 Superram
Transmission: 700R4 Transgo Shift Kit
Originally posted by Mangus
Iin other words, once your scanner is connected, remove the 10k resistor.
Do you mean that the Autoprom 10k switch should be returned to the center position after Tunerpro connects?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #5  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
If you see this issue, then yes. The 10k is only needed for connection.

Last edited by Mangus; Jun 22, 2004 at 04:36 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 04:56 PM
  #6  
wwnf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: Indiana, PA
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: SC'ed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11 12bolt
Oh, Ok, I'll try that and let everyone know if it worked.

Thanks
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #7  
wwnf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: Indiana, PA
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: SC'ed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11 12bolt
I removed the 10K resistor after connection and it stops sending the 25 frame ALDL data.

Oh well.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #8  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by wwnf
I removed the 10K resistor after connection and it stops sending the 25 frame ALDL data.

Oh well.
Don't use WinALDL. Use an 8192 baud data logger such as Moates. Once connected at 8192 remove the 10K and it will keep going.

RBob.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 07:20 PM
  #9  
nape's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: SW Chicago 'burbs
Car: American Iron Firebird
Engine: The little 305 that could.
Transmission: Richmond T-10
Axle/Gears: Floater 9" - 3.64 gears
Originally posted by AlexJH
According to Vader:

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...+mode+ecm+idle

<I>A 10K ohm resistance in the diagnostic terminal to ground will invoke the factory End of Line Test Mode, or ALDL Mode. When the assembly line diagnostic mode is detected, the fuel logic will bypass the closed loop time criteria. The fuel logic will enter closed loop mode as soon as the coolant temperature and oxygen sensor thresholds are met. There will be no reset of the integrator function. The IAC will use the calibration memory table value corresponding to a battery voltage of 8 volts, bypass certain criteria for RPM closed loop enable, and bypass coolant restrictions for enabling IAC kick-down mode. The EST system will disable the Burst Knock logic and bypass the RPM and coolant temperature criteria for ESC retard enable. That will force the engine into a condition where spark knock should occur if the throttle is suddenly opened (Burst Knock). Additionally, if ALDL mode has been enabled longer than a PROM timer value, the timer will be removed from the spark advance calculation. The TCC logic will allow the TCC to be enabled sooner and without regard to the CTS input.</I>
SON OF A B*TCH!

I wish I would've known about that. I've been trying to tune out a symptom exactly like that since I've started tuning.

My blood is boiling right now if it's that easy of a fix. I'll BRB, going for a test drive.

[edit] that didn't fix the problem, although it seemed to help. I keep throwing a Code 43 and it didn't pop up at all and the car seemed to have less knock. I'll have to test it more to know whether it helped or if I'm just getting the tune closer. [/edit]

Last edited by nape; Jun 22, 2004 at 07:47 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 09:40 PM
  #10  
wwnf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: Indiana, PA
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: SC'ed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11 12bolt
I thought I read somewhere that my car will only work on 160 baud!?

I guess I'll need that other diagram to update my cable. =)
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 10:14 PM
  #11  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Originally posted by wwnf
I thought I read somewhere that my car will only work on 160 baud!?

I guess I'll need that other diagram to update my cable. =)
what mask? $6E? if so, it will do 8192. $32 and $32B will not, but if you have a 1227165, you should go ahead and update to $6E to take advantage of the 8192 (among other things).
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 07:21 AM
  #12  
wwnf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: Indiana, PA
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: SC'ed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11 12bolt
Is that all you have to do to upgrade from $32 or $32b is just start with an appropriate $6E bin and update/burn it?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #13  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
almost. need to remove the cold start injector and possible disable vats in the bin (if your car doesn't have it). the information is here on the boards. do a search.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 01:47 PM
  #14  
RedIrocZ-28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Car: Iroc-Z
Engine: 355 AFR'd HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Wait wait wait... why isn't this **** in the n00b intros? No one EVER told me that you are supposed to switch off the 10k ohm resistor after you have made a connection. Sparknock? I guess I shouldn't have any in the first place. I only get a few, richening things up is only hurting me now since I already don't have real knock, just knock picked up by the scanner because of the scanning procedure itself...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 03:25 PM
  #15  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
1) It can be searched on
2) It is specific to only a couple configurations and is not a global condition and therefore doesn't belong in a global intro article.
3) Here it is, right here in this thread. Now you know, and knowing is half the battle. =)
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 09:10 PM
  #16  
RedIrocZ-28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Car: Iroc-Z
Engine: 355 AFR'd HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Mangus
1) It can be searched on
2) It is specific to only a couple configurations and is not a global condition and therefore doesn't belong in a global intro article.
3) Here it is, right here in this thread. Now you know, and knowing is half the battle. =)
Why would anyone think to search about if they should turn off the 10k resistor in their data cable? ever?

Maybe I'll go google whether or not I need to use different rods to make my motor a 350, afterall that sounds about as assinine as it not being common (public?) knowledge that some applications need not use the 10k ohm resistor after connection through the UART device
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 09:49 PM
  #17  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
If you had a problem related to ALDL, just like this guy did, you'd think to ask, just like he did.

If you aren't having problems, then no, you wouildn't think to search. But then you don't have a problem, so your non-search doesn't matter.

See, logically, its quite simple. If you don't have a problem, you don't need to fix it.

I don't have to remove the 10k because I don't have any idle or spark issues. Like I said in my previous post - this isn't a problem for most.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 01:11 AM
  #18  
RedIrocZ-28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Car: Iroc-Z
Engine: 355 AFR'd HSR
Transmission: 700R4
I understand what you are saying. However, Vader specifically stated that, "Yes.", the ECM functions differently when ALDL mode is induced. "The EST system will disable the Burst Knock logic and bypass the RPM and coolant temperature criteria for ESC retard enable. That will force the engine into a condition where spark knock should occur if the throttle is suddenly opened (Burst Knock)."

It says right there in plain english that if you hammer the gas, you should see spark knock. Lo and Behold I thought this was just a tuning issue that I was never able to get rid of. I'm probably not getting an spark knock. I'm probably dumping too much fuel in for AE.

On the flip side of the coin, it still could be a tuning issue. But, in light of recent events, specifically the information provided here, it may just be hardware induced. Perhaps thats why it seems that when I make a change in the right direction it seems to make the car run worse yet when I go *** backwards it runs better but scares me because I know its not supposed to be going that way (too lean... according to the scan tool).
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 10:43 AM
  #19  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
So, is this a common problem with all scanning software, or is it TunerPro only?

Specifically, I use Datamaster.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 11:25 AM
  #20  
AlexJH's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 1
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by va454ss
So, is this a common problem with all scanning software, or is it TunerPro only?

Specifically, I use Datamaster.
The 10k resistor issue is in the ECM's firmware, so it will affect all scanning software.

And with my AKM Cable there's no way of disabling the resistor.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 11:33 AM
  #21  
AlexJH's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 1
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: 700R4
dupe

Last edited by AlexJH; Jun 24, 2004 at 11:35 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 03:10 PM
  #22  
Cobra289's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: The Netherlands
Car: Cobra Kit Car
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.31
I have got the same problem and in particular the Knock.

I have learned from RBob that at the address $23 is a SA adder value that should be changed to zero during ALDL data logging (In my case it was SA 8.09 deg.)

Well I did the change and it works.
After that I did change my ECU files for easy change with TunerPro.

You can find it under “Constants” at the “S.A. adder for ALDL (10K mode)”

Please be informed that I am not the owner of the original ECU files, and as you see I put the letter “a” in the version for recognition.

http://www.donostia.demon.nl/32Bv001a.ecu
http://www.donostia.demon.nl/6Ev011a.ecu

I hope that this will help you.
Regards,
Cobra289
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 08:58 PM
  #23  
Sena'sIROC's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Midwest City, OK
Originally posted by Cobra289
I have learned from RBob that at the address $23 is a SA adder value that should be changed to zero during ALDL data logging (In my case it was SA 8.09 deg.)

You can find it under “Constants” at the “S.A. adder for ALDL (10K mode)”
Cobra289,

So ONLY when datalogging I need to go down to the SA adder for ALDL(10K mode) and set it to 0?

What in effect is this added constant doing when I zero it out?

Thanks.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2004 | 06:47 AM
  #24  
Cobra289's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: The Netherlands
Car: Cobra Kit Car
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.31
Hi Sena'sIROC
Here you can find what RBob advice to me.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=241823
You don’t need to change it back after data logging, this is only and SA adder during ALDL data logging.
It seams that GM have put and SA adder during data logging, why? I don’t know. It is possible that they introduced because some ALDL test equipment or special test requirements.
Here you got more info about the $23 address.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...ighlight=%2423

(RBob information)

Ahh, the '165? When scanning in 8192 baud mode (w/the 10K resistor) the code adds a particular amount of timing (6° SA out of the blue). You mentioned mask $6E (possibly ARAP), if so then zero out location $23 in the bin. That is the ALDL adder SA.

The coolant vs LV8 table makes timing corrections based on coolant temperature and load. _typically_ at normal coolant temperatures (195° stat) the timing corrections are/should be zero. But they aren't always that way.

RBob.

Whenever the 10K resistor is across ALDL terminals A & B the code adds the ALDL SA adder. No 10K resistor, no ALDL SA adder. As I mentioned I don't know if it shows up in the ALDL data stream. (This is all for the $6E mask, $8D does not require the 10K resistor for 8192 baud ALDL).

As an aside I checked ARAP and the ALDL SA adder value is 8.1 deg.

RBob.
I hope this will be answering your question.
Regards,
Cobra289
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 08:59 AM
  #25  
wwnf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: Indiana, PA
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: SC'ed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11 12bolt
Update

I have updated from mask $32 to $6E and made a new two transitor cable with a 10K resistor wired into a $1 walmart 20A 12volt toggle switch so that once I'm connected I just flip the switch to off and we're ready to go. =)

I'll post a picture later. (so everyone can laugh at it, but it works)
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 01:50 PM
  #26  
Dave_Jones's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 462
Likes: 1
From: Ft. Leavenworth, KS
Car: 83 TA, 89 TTA, others
Engine: ZZ4 TPI, LC2 turbo v6
Transmission: several, mostly broken
Originally posted by AlexJH
And with my AKM Cable there's no way of disabling the resistor.
What I did on mine, was to put a small SPST switch into the connector body, so as to be able to open or close the 10K circuit.

Doesn't get used a whole lot, since I don't run the 165 very often, but it's there if I need it.

The gray stuff around the switch is JB Weld, BTW.
Attached Thumbnails Idles faster when ALDL is connected?-10kswitch.jpg  
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 02:19 PM
  #27  
poncho@home's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Laval, Canada
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
same here...simply put a 10 k resistor on a switch....that way I just flick the switch to datalog...but what I have noticed is that once data is being sent, even if the ignition is off the datastream picks up again once starting the car without the need of the 10k resistor...obviously only when the software isn't shut down in between the on/off ignition...explain this one.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike_c
TPI
4
Aug 27, 2015 04:32 PM
mdtoren
TPI
12
Aug 23, 2015 12:52 PM
zeitghaist
Tech / General Engine
4
Aug 18, 2015 07:33 AM
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
Aug 16, 2015 05:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.