MAP conversions in $58.ECU file
MAP conversions in $58.ECU file
I'm working with a $58 ecu file in Tuner pro. Seems like all of the MAP conversions are kind hosed when compared to Promgrammer. Anyone have the correct math on these?
Thanks much
Steve
Thanks much
Steve
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: MAP conversions in $58.ECU file
Originally posted by SABLT194
I'm working with a $58 ecu file in Tuner pro. Seems like all of the MAP conversions are kind hosed when compared to Promgrammer. Anyone have the correct math on these?
I'm working with a $58 ecu file in Tuner pro. Seems like all of the MAP conversions are kind hosed when compared to Promgrammer. Anyone have the correct math on these?
Which table(s) do you mean?.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
How far off are they? Doesn't Promgrammer show you the math used (bin a bit since last I saw Promgrammer)?
I'm looking at the PE enable stuff like:
Power Enrichment Threshhold
Primary MAP Threshhold
Secondary MAP Threshhold
The ECU file I'm using is file name 58.ecu (pretty clever huh). I'm not sure where it originated but it is very complete
The MAP conversions are as follows:
MAP= Value * .369004 + 10.35
Promgrammer does not show calcs AFAIK
Steve
Power Enrichment Threshhold
Primary MAP Threshhold
Secondary MAP Threshhold
The ECU file I'm using is file name 58.ecu (pretty clever huh). I'm not sure where it originated but it is very complete

The MAP conversions are as follows:
MAP= Value * .369004 + 10.35
Promgrammer does not show calcs AFAIK
Steve
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by SABLT194
I'm looking at the PE enable stuff like:
Power Enrichment Threshhold
Primary MAP Threshhold
Secondary MAP Threshhold
The ECU file I'm using is file name 58.ecu (pretty clever huh). I'm not sure where it originated but it is very complete
The MAP conversions are as follows:
MAP= Value * .369004 + 10.35
Promgrammer does not show calcs AFAIK
Steve
I'm looking at the PE enable stuff like:
Power Enrichment Threshhold
Primary MAP Threshhold
Secondary MAP Threshhold
The ECU file I'm using is file name 58.ecu (pretty clever huh). I'm not sure where it originated but it is very complete

The MAP conversions are as follows:
MAP= Value * .369004 + 10.35
Promgrammer does not show calcs AFAIK
Steve
This is something that I would typically verify on a test bench, but alas, I don't have one set up for the P4's yet.
RBob.
Here's what i figure the calculation to be in Promgrammer:
8 + Value * .781176
I set hex to 00 and Promgrammer returned MAP value of 8 KPA.
Set Hex to FF and Promgrammer returns 207.2 KPA
This is with the 2 bar MAP bit set (don't know if that makes a diff)
8 + Value * .781176
I set hex to 00 and Promgrammer returned MAP value of 8 KPA.
Set Hex to FF and Promgrammer returns 207.2 KPA
This is with the 2 bar MAP bit set (don't know if that makes a diff)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





