DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

S_AUJP3 and Tuner Pro ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #1  
JERRYWHO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 1
From: So-cal.
S_AUJP3 and Tuner Pro ?

I just down loaded Tuner Pro (allways used Tuner cat before) and the S_AUJP 3 bin, when you look at the 5,600 and the 6,400 Ve tables both of them are different at the same Kpa and rpm, Why is this? I know the 5,600 table is not used, but all tables are all the same in S_AUJP 1, 2, and 3. Is something off on the new table?

Jerry

Last edited by JERRYWHO; Mar 28, 2005 at 01:05 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 03:41 PM
  #2  
Z69's Avatar
Z69
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 1
From: Texas
I noticed something similar while working on my VE3 patch.
I was getting different from my aujp #'s. Figured it was me.

Last edited by Z69; Mar 28, 2005 at 03:45 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 09:00 AM
  #3  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
This is my fault. Sorry.

RBob states "The VE values in the patch are the stock AXCN values". I needed to change them over to the AUJP values. I didn't. Doing that now and then reuploading them. Sorry.

Tim
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #4  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
OK. This is done.

NOTE: Until I get Craig Moates to delete the old files be aware that the NEW files have the name in capital letters and the old files with inappropriate VE values are in lower case letters.

For Example:
New File = S_AUJP_v3.zip
Old File = s_aujp_v3.zip

Tim
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #5  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
I've deleted the old files. Should I remove the V2 files too?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 02:49 PM
  #6  
Z69's Avatar
Z69
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 1
From: Texas
RBob states "The VE values in the patch are the stock AXCN values".
Your not the only one that missed it....
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 03:27 PM
  #7  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by Mangus
I've deleted the old files. Should I remove the V2 files too?
Mangus,

I would say no. Let's leave them there for those that don't want the new hardcode changes. Coolio?

Tim
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tmellott89
DIY PROM
7
Oct 14, 2015 02:06 PM
djmarch
Tech / General Engine
29
Oct 2, 2015 10:41 PM
MitcherNeaf
DIY PROM
3
Sep 24, 2015 09:23 PM
rubyred88
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2015 02:19 PM
85Special
DIY PROM
1
Sep 3, 2015 04:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 PM.