DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Asynch -> Synch

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2005 | 08:31 PM
  #1  
va454ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Asynch -> Synch

7060 PCM.

TunerCat has thresholds that can be adjusted to go from asynch to synch and vice versa.

Would there be any benefit to changing these thresholds?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #2  
va454ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
No one?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 08:33 AM
  #3  
RednGold86Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
I've never touched or looked at 7060, but in general, Async has been used by GM to get the PW's bigger in low MAP and idle conditions in order to keep the fuel flow rate accurate (it attempts to anyway). Small PWs on TBI injectors (sub 1.3 ms TOTAL - including vbatt offsets, etc..) tend to get rather lean in a big hurry (although one type of injector that I tested could run just fine at .8 ms total, not sure why). It's difficult to "tune" around a non-linearity, and this brings the flow back to the linear range where x% increase in PW brings the same increase in flow.

Last edited by RednGold86Z; Jul 19, 2005 at 08:39 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:16 AM
  #4  
va454ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Thanks.

I just wondered why they would allow this adjustment. Would it be of an advantage to lower the threshold where Async changes to Sync? Currently its set at 6400.

Just wondering if playing with these would allow more fueling leeway at above 4K rpm or so?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 11:41 AM
  #5  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
You can change the crosover point on 747's as well. I just set mine to 0 so that it never goes into Asynch...well accept for AE. All AE is asynch. Car runs much better now. Some cars have problems with the transistion from one mode to the other. Mine did.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #6  
va454ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by BMmonteSS
You can change the crosover point on 747's as well. I just set mine to 0 so that it never goes into Asynch...well accept for AE. All AE is asynch. Car runs much better now. Some cars have problems with the transistion from one mode to the other. Mine did.
Can you describe the problems you had during the transition; for instance, what rpm, etc?
Thanks!
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 11:11 PM
  #7  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
Red,

[i] (although one type of injector that I tested could run just fine at .8 ms total, not sure why). It's difficult to "tune" around a non-linearity, and this brings the flow back to the linear range where x% increase in PW brings the same increase in flow.
TBI injectors!? Which ones?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 09:45 AM
  #8  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
I couldn't really describe it because basically it was erratic. It just seemed like changes I made weren't doing anything, and I would get a stumble and a jump in PW to go along with it. It did this more at low rpm's mostly at idle, or right off idle. Rbob pointed me in the right direction and once I disabled it things started working correctly.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #9  
va454ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Currently, this is what I have:

RPM for Async --> Sync 6375

RPM for Sync --> Async 6350

How low should I go on the Sync --> Async for normal fueling? Is 0 too low?


MAP for Async --> Sync 104.4

MAP for Sync --> Asynce 104.1

Again, is 0 too low for Async --> Sync?


Max Async BPW 11.993 mSec

Min Async BPW 1.404 mSec

Should these 2 be adjusted?


Min Async BPW Hysteresis .504 mSec

Min Sync BPW Hysteresis .305 mSec

Do the Min and Max AFR settings for Open Loop affect commanded WOT AFR?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 08:48 AM
  #10  
va454ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
???
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 09:50 AM
  #11  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
6000 RPM Sounds like it's set really high to disable it.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 12:29 PM
  #12  
va454ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by BMmonteSS
6000 RPM Sounds like it's set really high to disable it.
Its a modified code. VE tables go to 6400.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ronny
DIY PROM
7
Mar 27, 2013 03:37 PM
Ronny
DIY PROM
11
Jun 25, 2007 01:54 PM
Ronny
DIY PROM
10
Nov 2, 2006 01:15 PM
Ronny
DIY PROM
2
Jun 15, 2006 10:52 AM
Ronny
DIY PROM
3
Dec 12, 2005 09:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.