Asynch -> Synch
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Asynch -> Synch
7060 PCM.
TunerCat has thresholds that can be adjusted to go from asynch to synch and vice versa.
Would there be any benefit to changing these thresholds?
TunerCat has thresholds that can be adjusted to go from asynch to synch and vice versa.
Would there be any benefit to changing these thresholds?
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
I've never touched or looked at 7060, but in general, Async has been used by GM to get the PW's bigger in low MAP and idle conditions in order to keep the fuel flow rate accurate (it attempts to anyway). Small PWs on TBI injectors (sub 1.3 ms TOTAL - including vbatt offsets, etc..) tend to get rather lean in a big hurry (although one type of injector that I tested could run just fine at .8 ms total, not sure why). It's difficult to "tune" around a non-linearity, and this brings the flow back to the linear range where x% increase in PW brings the same increase in flow.
Last edited by RednGold86Z; Jul 19, 2005 at 08:39 AM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Thanks.
I just wondered why they would allow this adjustment. Would it be of an advantage to lower the threshold where Async changes to Sync? Currently its set at 6400.
Just wondering if playing with these would allow more fueling leeway at above 4K rpm or so?
I just wondered why they would allow this adjustment. Would it be of an advantage to lower the threshold where Async changes to Sync? Currently its set at 6400.
Just wondering if playing with these would allow more fueling leeway at above 4K rpm or so?
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
You can change the crosover point on 747's as well. I just set mine to 0 so that it never goes into Asynch...well accept for AE. All AE is asynch. Car runs much better now. Some cars have problems with the transistion from one mode to the other. Mine did.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by BMmonteSS
You can change the crosover point on 747's as well. I just set mine to 0 so that it never goes into Asynch...well accept for AE. All AE is asynch. Car runs much better now. Some cars have problems with the transistion from one mode to the other. Mine did.
You can change the crosover point on 747's as well. I just set mine to 0 so that it never goes into Asynch...well accept for AE. All AE is asynch. Car runs much better now. Some cars have problems with the transistion from one mode to the other. Mine did.
Thanks!
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
Red,
TBI injectors!? Which ones?
[i] (although one type of injector that I tested could run just fine at .8 ms total, not sure why). It's difficult to "tune" around a non-linearity, and this brings the flow back to the linear range where x% increase in PW brings the same increase in flow.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
I couldn't really describe it because basically it was erratic. It just seemed like changes I made weren't doing anything, and I would get a stumble and a jump in PW to go along with it. It did this more at low rpm's mostly at idle, or right off idle. Rbob pointed me in the right direction and once I disabled it things started working correctly.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Currently, this is what I have:
RPM for Async --> Sync 6375
RPM for Sync --> Async 6350
How low should I go on the Sync --> Async for normal fueling? Is 0 too low?
MAP for Async --> Sync 104.4
MAP for Sync --> Asynce 104.1
Again, is 0 too low for Async --> Sync?
Max Async BPW 11.993 mSec
Min Async BPW 1.404 mSec
Should these 2 be adjusted?
Min Async BPW Hysteresis .504 mSec
Min Sync BPW Hysteresis .305 mSec
Do the Min and Max AFR settings for Open Loop affect commanded WOT AFR?
Thanks!
RPM for Async --> Sync 6375
RPM for Sync --> Async 6350
How low should I go on the Sync --> Async for normal fueling? Is 0 too low?
MAP for Async --> Sync 104.4
MAP for Sync --> Asynce 104.1
Again, is 0 too low for Async --> Sync?
Max Async BPW 11.993 mSec
Min Async BPW 1.404 mSec
Should these 2 be adjusted?
Min Async BPW Hysteresis .504 mSec
Min Sync BPW Hysteresis .305 mSec
Do the Min and Max AFR settings for Open Loop affect commanded WOT AFR?
Thanks!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




Sounds like it's set really high to disable it.
