$DA3 AE tables...
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Hope this helps.. This is from a BDZP memcal which is a LT1 auto bin with 3.23 gear ratio.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by ULTM8Z
Thanks! WOW! GM is adding A LOT more fuel than I've put into mine.
I'm going to throw these tables into my cal and see what happens.
Thanks! WOW! GM is adding A LOT more fuel than I've put into mine.
I'm going to throw these tables into my cal and see what happens.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by ULTM8Z
No, I'm running the $8D mask. Are you saying that a value of say 1.500 in $DA3 is not necessarily greater than a 1.400 in $8D??
No, I'm running the $8D mask. Are you saying that a value of say 1.500 in $DA3 is not necessarily greater than a 1.400 in $8D??
Let's say there is a factor somewhere in there that multiplies the final AE by .8 where as there is no factor in the $8D, now if you copy all of the obvious AE tables word for word you'll have .8 of the AE and be worse off because of it, make sense?
Definatly take notes on how the Lt1 handles AE but I wouldn't advise copy and pasting.
Noted.
Uh, yeah... I'd say the SA transfered over exceptionally well!!
Thing is though, I've been increasing up to these AE values anyway just through my own testing. However, in order to completely rid the car of the all-too-common Miniram tip-in stumble, it was getting to the point where the car wanted (and apparently still does) so much more AE than an AUJP car, that I started questioning it. Up to this point, I've been going on Grumpy's ol' addage "give the car what it wants". I also read a ton of material in the archives about what people (Traxxion, 89Vette, and others) were doing to get rid of their stumbles. It then occured to me that the early batch-fire LT1's were a good reference OEM point since mechanically the engine is a lot more similar to mine than any TPI would be. Unless GM is doing something unknown to us like you said, it would appear that they had already arrived at the point where I'm currently headed.
Uh, yeah... I'd say the SA transfered over exceptionally well!!
Thing is though, I've been increasing up to these AE values anyway just through my own testing. However, in order to completely rid the car of the all-too-common Miniram tip-in stumble, it was getting to the point where the car wanted (and apparently still does) so much more AE than an AUJP car, that I started questioning it. Up to this point, I've been going on Grumpy's ol' addage "give the car what it wants". I also read a ton of material in the archives about what people (Traxxion, 89Vette, and others) were doing to get rid of their stumbles. It then occured to me that the early batch-fire LT1's were a good reference OEM point since mechanically the engine is a lot more similar to mine than any TPI would be. Unless GM is doing something unknown to us like you said, it would appear that they had already arrived at the point where I'm currently headed.
Last edited by ULTM8Z; Dec 31, 2005 at 01:38 PM.
Trending Topics
I agree with JP.
89 didn't list any constants above. They may have cut a constant by 30% and stuck more fuel back into a table.
But at a glance, aujp has a considerable difference in the PW vs DRP table and the Mult vs TPS tables.
In discussions I've had offline, it was brought up that Traxion added a considerable amt of AE when he went to a mini ram.
But his combo is a bit different from yours.
69 Ghost told me he had to add 30% or something AE when he went to an LT1 intake. TB will make a difference too.
Might ask around.
A high speed datalogger and a WB is a quick way to see how the AE is doing.
89 didn't list any constants above. They may have cut a constant by 30% and stuck more fuel back into a table.
But at a glance, aujp has a considerable difference in the PW vs DRP table and the Mult vs TPS tables.
In discussions I've had offline, it was brought up that Traxion added a considerable amt of AE when he went to a mini ram.
But his combo is a bit different from yours.
69 Ghost told me he had to add 30% or something AE when he went to an LT1 intake. TB will make a difference too.
Might ask around.
A high speed datalogger and a WB is a quick way to see how the AE is doing.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, Ca
Car: 69 Camaro
Engine: LS1 converted to LS6
Transmission: 4L70
Axle/Gears: 12bolt 3:42
I have used the AE and PE tables directly from the DA2-DA3 bins with fantastic results. Traxion in the past stated that a Mini wants at least 30% more pump shot but also drops it off sooner. He alludes to a 50% pumpshot is what he ended up with in another post. The first clue is if you hit the throttle as quick as possible and it backfires you don't have enough AE pumpshot. So far my motor likes it -alot. I have just started WBO2 tuning and I am all over the place tuning for PE, etc. I can send you a copy of what I am running right now. My setup is very similiar to yours. Currently my only problem is my car does not behave when it is cold and I put it in gear it stalls. I am also curious about your split BLM issue you had a while back...
Last edited by 69 Ghost; Jan 9, 2006 at 10:42 AM.
Well, I input the AE tables above and sure enough, the throttle response is significantly crisper than before. A little more fine tuning of it and I should be good to go on the AE.
The PE and SA from the $EE mask worked extremely well. Now, the AE from the $DA3 mask improves the throttle response. Can't wait to get that LT1 PCM into the car. It's going to be awesome!
The PE and SA from the $EE mask worked extremely well. Now, the AE from the $DA3 mask improves the throttle response. Can't wait to get that LT1 PCM into the car. It's going to be awesome!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





