thoughts on notional 540 BBC w/ 7730 $8D?
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 286
Likes: 6
From: USA
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt BW
thoughts on notional 540 BBC w/ 7730 $8D?
I'm toying with the idea of converting my carbureted 540 BBC to EFI for my other car. I've been messing with my '90 IROC TPI 7730 & $8D (Prominator, TunerPro RT, etc). Just wondering if this same technology would transfer to a larger big-block. The 540's got a very streetable Crane solid roller cam, rect-port alum heads, headers, etc, no smog reqt. looking at the Edelbrock single-plane Victor-style manifold (cost-effective), already got spare 7730 ECMs & other TPI EFI parts. just wondering if there's GM design constraints inherent in the 7730 w/ $8D which would prevent this from being do-able.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
I'm toying with the idea of converting my carbureted 540 BBC to EFI for my other car. I've been messing with my '90 IROC TPI 7730 & $8D (Prominator, TunerPro RT, etc). Just wondering if this same technology would transfer to a larger big-block. The 540's got a very streetable Crane solid roller cam, rect-port alum heads, headers, etc, no smog reqt. looking at the Edelbrock single-plane Victor-style manifold (cost-effective), already got spare 7730 ECMs & other TPI EFI parts. just wondering if there's GM design constraints inherent in the 7730 w/ $8D which would prevent this from being do-able.
Other then that, you should be good to go.
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: West Plains, Missouri 65775
Car: 1967 C10 Pickup
Engine: TPI 305, Megasquirt
Transmission: TH400
I too have the same thing in plan, 489 cu BBC stroker, 96 model vortech truck intake, mild roller cam.
If someone knows the flaw let us know.
thanks.
If someone knows the flaw let us know.
thanks.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
You don't actually NEED to use the correct injector flow rate and displacement, it just helps the numbers look better, and makes it easier to adapt to different injectors or fuel pressures.
The airflow calculations probably cancel themselves out somewhat, i.e. if something uses airflow, and you increase the displacement value, you'll probably need to reduce the effect of that in the calibration in order to get it to behave correctly and to behave the same way as if you didn't change the displacement.
The airflow calculations probably cancel themselves out somewhat, i.e. if something uses airflow, and you increase the displacement value, you'll probably need to reduce the effect of that in the calibration in order to get it to behave correctly and to behave the same way as if you didn't change the displacement.
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
If I'm not mistaken Rbob or myself added it inot the sticky sections above.
Was basically a calculation that limited flow and made an artificial fueling ceiling.
later
Jeremy
Was basically a calculation that limited flow and made an artificial fueling ceiling.
later
Jeremy
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: '90 Formula
Engine: L98 --> Ramjet
Transmission: Auto
Here's the "fix" thread that I think is being referred to:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...t=pe+pw+fix+8d
I'm almost positive that this "fix" is implemented in Super AUJP version 3.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...t=pe+pw+fix+8d
I'm almost positive that this "fix" is implemented in Super AUJP version 3.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sailtexas186548
DFI and ECM
7
Apr 10, 2013 02:48 PM





