Knock sensor bypass in .bin ?
Knock sensor bypass in .bin ?
hi. I'm pretty new to prom burning but I'd like to ask a question. My knock sensor's been bypassed for the last couple of years or so with a resistor to ground ( I have my reasons). Lately I'm starting to see knock counts on Diacom and I can see and feel the timing being pulled back by the ECM. Even though I've pretty much zeroed out the knock tables in the bin for NO knock retard it still does it. My question is... is there a routine in the .bin that can by somehow bypassed for the ECM to completly ignore the knock sensor input ? Or a flag that could be set somehow ?
Thanx
------------------
1991 Z28
Thanx

------------------
1991 Z28
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by crucial:
hi. I'm pretty new to prom burning but I'd like to ask a question. My knock sensor's been bypassed for the last couple of years or so with a resistor to ground ( I have my reasons). Lately I'm starting to see knock counts on Diacom and I can see and feel the timing being pulled back by the ECM. Even though I've pretty much zeroed out the knock tables in the bin for NO knock retard it still does it. My question is... is there a routine in the .bin that can by somehow bypassed for the ECM to completly ignore the knock sensor input ? Or a flag that could be set somehow ?
Thanx
</font>
hi. I'm pretty new to prom burning but I'd like to ask a question. My knock sensor's been bypassed for the last couple of years or so with a resistor to ground ( I have my reasons). Lately I'm starting to see knock counts on Diacom and I can see and feel the timing being pulled back by the ECM. Even though I've pretty much zeroed out the knock tables in the bin for NO knock retard it still does it. My question is... is there a routine in the .bin that can by somehow bypassed for the ECM to completly ignore the knock sensor input ? Or a flag that could be set somehow ?
Thanx

</font>
If your using an 8D mask try setting 020A and 020B, to FF. Being experimential in nature use the above at your own risk. Your already running sans sensor, which depending on your availibility of good gas can make this potentialy danagerous.
Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, TX
Car: Used to be an '87 IROC
Engine: 5.7l TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:23?
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by crucial:
...Even though I've pretty much zeroed out the knock tables in the bin for NO knock retard it still does it....
</font>
...Even though I've pretty much zeroed out the knock tables in the bin for NO knock retard it still does it....
</font>
------------------
'87 IROC 5.7l TPI - original owner!
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by P J Moran:
I can see how knock can still be detected, but if he sets the max retard to zero, how can he still be seeing retard? Is there logic that will retard the timing "regardless"?
</font>
I can see how knock can still be detected, but if he sets the max retard to zero, how can he still be seeing retard? Is there logic that will retard the timing "regardless"?
</font>
That why I suggest to folks who are serious about actual code and tuning to make an ECM test bench.
http://www.diy-efi.org/gmecm/project...cm_tbench1.jpg
It looks like I had a bad ground. I bypassed t again with a 3.5K resistor this time and a new ground. I only see 2 knock counts when I first start the engine and it stays at 2. No more pulling back timing either. And yes I run good gas. I always run 100 octane in it
It smells great and the car runs good too.
It smells great and the car runs good too.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by crucial:
It looks like I had a bad ground. I bypassed it again with a 3.5K resistor this time and a new ground. I only see 2 knock counts when I first start the engine and it stays at 2. No more pulling back timing either. And yes I run good gas. I always run 100 octane in it
It smells great and the car runs good too.</font>
It looks like I had a bad ground. I bypassed it again with a 3.5K resistor this time and a new ground. I only see 2 knock counts when I first start the engine and it stays at 2. No more pulling back timing either. And yes I run good gas. I always run 100 octane in it
It smells great and the car runs good too.</font>
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
I've had very good luck "capping" the Max Knock Retard @ WOT (or while in PE). This allows me to control my knock incidences @ WOT, but retain the knock sensor for part throttle.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Glenn91L98GTA:
I've had very good luck "capping" the Max Knock Retard @ WOT (or while in PE). This allows me to control my knock incidences @ WOT, but retain the knock sensor for part throttle.</font>
I've had very good luck "capping" the Max Knock Retard @ WOT (or while in PE). This allows me to control my knock incidences @ WOT, but retain the knock sensor for part throttle.</font>
Yep,
I've gotten a load of lousy gas several times, and I'd rather let the engine go way down on power then have any detonation.
Just my 1.326 cents worth
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FormulasOnly
Tech / General Engine
3
Sep 10, 2015 09:07 PM





