WB02 sample rate?
03-12-2008, 01:59 PM
#1
WB02 sample rate?
aiight so im in the middle of the process of tuning my combo and i need a wb02.. will a faster sample rate of the wb02 help in my mpg tuning or what?
like i noticed the lc1 is slower than say some others. how will the more sample rate be better as far as accuracy? or is it not something to worry about?
i need to decide on a wb02 as its the final thing i need.
like i noticed the lc1 is slower than say some others. how will the more sample rate be better as far as accuracy? or is it not something to worry about?
i need to decide on a wb02 as its the final thing i need.
03-12-2008, 02:17 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Shippensburg, PA
Posts: 680
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1981 Buick Century Wagon
Engine: 87 GN engine
Transmission: 2004R
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: WB02 sample rate?
I have a LC-1, and running through logworks the sample rate seems instantanious, when I log the WB through the WUB for my ebl, I have to slow down the sample rate as it it way to fast, meaning when I look at a datalog, which is broken down into like 1/12 of a second, the afr isn't steady, ex.
1min 1sec =12.1
1min 1sec =12.8
1min 1sec =12.2
1min 1sec =12.4
etc till it hits the next second, slowing the sample rate down give me a better average representation of the AFR. Just my experiance. Now if you have a WBo2 for each cylinder, then the faster rate would be more beneficial IMO, since you could see variances from cylinder to cylinder.
1min 1sec =12.1
1min 1sec =12.8
1min 1sec =12.2
1min 1sec =12.4
etc till it hits the next second, slowing the sample rate down give me a better average representation of the AFR. Just my experiance. Now if you have a WBo2 for each cylinder, then the faster rate would be more beneficial IMO, since you could see variances from cylinder to cylinder.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
10-08-2015 08:34 PM
