DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

mini IDE assembly problems w/$0D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #1  
BIG 'G''s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
mini IDE assembly problems w/$0D

I'm currently trying to get the OD hac by dimented to assemble, and am eccountering the exact same problems as junkcltr (see post 325 and 327 of tbi guys its time to update) with the program being offset and extended adresses being coded as direct adress. Ive run the file through the mini ide under windows and under dos as suggested by dimented but am getting the same results. Dimented has suggested adding a constant byte to correct the problem. I'm not sure what is meant by a constant byte, or how it is to be used, should it be placed in the .asm file or formatted into the mini ide. definatly would apprreciat the help. thanks
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #2  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: mini IDE assembly problems w/$0D

Is it just a few of the addresses being different? I remember fixing a few errors in the original code that used the incorrect addressing modes where used in several places.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 10:18 PM
  #3  
BIG 'G''s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Re: mini IDE assembly problems w/$0D

Actually their are quite a few differences, I found four corrections you made at C322, C338, C754, and C77D where you switched from extended to direct addressing. This was offsetting the bin by a total of 4 lines (or maby bytes) which is what i was seeing when comparing bins in tuner pro. Your refference to the constant byte was throwing me off, thought i was making a mistake when converting it to a bin. Turns out my mistake was not re calcing the check sum which changed due to your corrections. I have fixed the checksum and now have the reassembled bin working . Thanks for your help dimented
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
Cleotiz
Electronics
7
Jan 6, 2018 08:56 PM
mhatfield 14
Tech / General Engine
5
Oct 24, 2015 07:48 AM
gixxer92
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Sep 1, 2015 04:32 PM
Dialed_In
Firebirds for Sale
2
Aug 20, 2015 01:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.