Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 26
From: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: Dart SHP 406ci T88 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP 35 spline Ford 9" 3.50 gears
Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
I've read this tuning AE article https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=195745 for 7730 but the table names are different in SAUJPv4 and I'm trying to find the table that affects AE globally. The table was called "accel enrich delta tps multiplier vs delta tps" in the article. Does anyone know what the saujpv4 equivalent is? Thanks.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 26
From: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: Dart SHP 406ci T88 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP 35 spline Ford 9" 3.50 gears
Re: Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
Thanks for the response. That's the table I was working with but I wasn't sure if it was the right one. My AFR's dip to 10:1 for an instance when I mash the throttle while going down the road. Does anyone know if that's normal?
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Car: 84 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 408
Transmission: 700-r4
Re: Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
I see the same thing with the TPS changing by more then 4-5%. I've been wondering if that's normal also. I currently run the stock values. I've been wondering if the larger injectors need a little less PW during pumpshot.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 26
From: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: Dart SHP 406ci T88 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP 35 spline Ford 9" 3.50 gears
Re: Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
Does anyone else experience this?
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Car: 84 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 408
Transmission: 700-r4
Re: Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
Well with all the tinkering I've been doing I had a chance to drop some of the lower table entries by 5%. What I noticed with my heated NB is that where I would normally hit 800+ mV I now was hitting about 700 mV. I might try another 5% in the lower range to see how it feels. I can't say that I feel a performance difference but there wasn't any increase in knock counts. I would imagine that a huge spike in the O2 at the lower TPS range makes it a little tougher to tune from a data log. I don't think it's as big of a deal if your just cruising along real slow and then go 50% on the go pedal. I can understand hitting 800 mV. But just cruising along and applying a little pedal to increase your MPH by a few digits doesn't make sense to hit 800+ mV. But also I have been reading up on O2 stuff. Apparently with a modified motor the O2 correction can overshoot the upper window target and shoot the mV up too. I'm gonna try to tighten that up a little as well.
Trending Topics
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
You may also want to tweak you IAC throttle follower too.
That can play a big role when moving the throttle.
I chased a lean spike and could not get AE enough to cover it but by reducing the TF it got better and I had too much AE.
Not saying to use that as the tool but something to see if it helps.
That can play a big role when moving the throttle.
I chased a lean spike and could not get AE enough to cover it but by reducing the TF it got better and I had too much AE.
Not saying to use that as the tool but something to see if it helps.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 26
From: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: Dart SHP 406ci T88 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP 35 spline Ford 9" 3.50 gears
Re: Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
You may also want to tweak you IAC throttle follower too.
That can play a big role when moving the throttle.
I chased a lean spike and could not get AE enough to cover it but by reducing the TF it got better and I had too much AE.
Not saying to use that as the tool but something to see if it helps.
That can play a big role when moving the throttle.
I chased a lean spike and could not get AE enough to cover it but by reducing the TF it got better and I had too much AE.
Not saying to use that as the tool but something to see if it helps.
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Car: 84 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 408
Transmission: 700-r4
Re: Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
There is a throttle follower under the constants. I believe the default in S-AUJP is about 39% or at least that is what I am using.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 26
From: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: Dart SHP 406ci T88 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP 35 spline Ford 9" 3.50 gears
Re: Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 26
From: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: Dart SHP 406ci T88 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP 35 spline Ford 9" 3.50 gears
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Car: 84 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 408
Transmission: 700-r4
Re: Global AE changes in S_AUJPV4
This should explain what it does better then I could.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...llower-8d.html
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...llower-8d.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Thirdgen89GTA
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
0
Aug 20, 2015 03:11 PM





