DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Old 06-26-2013, 08:48 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
EvelBist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Just wondering if anyone has been successfully datalogging an '89 with a $6E using the XtremeALDL and TP5? I've read some posts that say to use TP4 and scannerpro so it can be done, but how about TP5? I just cant get it to connect consistently, maybe 1 out of 10 times and then it disconnects after about a minute or two.

Any help is appreciated - very appreciated.
Old 06-26-2013, 09:08 AM
  #2  
Sponsor

iTrader: (92)
 
Tuned Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mile High Country !!!
Posts: 15,387
Received 642 Likes on 567 Posts
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Welcome to the 165, you might need to try another ecm.
Old 06-26-2013, 09:12 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,337
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

I use TunerPro 4 with the APU1 from Moates and it works like a charm. There's a bunch of settings that can change the way it works so play around with all of them and see if that helps.
Old 06-26-2013, 09:22 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

iTrader: (5)
 
heat seeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 383 SBC/HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

I use it all the time.....works great.
Old 06-26-2013, 10:22 AM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
EvelBist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Originally Posted by Tuned Performance
Welcome to the 165, you might need to try another ecm.
The car runs fine, and i can burn chips and make changes that way, but no logging - I do use a Tech1 GM scan tool to watch things in realtime though.

So youre saying its hit and miss with the 165 ECM? Something about their design is on the hairy edge of working right? Nice. I think thats what youre implying because I'm not the only one who's been posting as to how flaky their communication is.
Old 06-26-2013, 10:30 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,748
Received 367 Likes on 296 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

I use tp4 and it connects most of the time and logs for alittle while. Sometimes it doesnt want to connect and may stop logging randomly. Always been a thing associated with 165 ecms
Old 06-26-2013, 10:57 AM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
EvelBist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
I use tp4 and it connects most of the time and logs for alittle while. Sometimes it doesnt want to connect and may stop logging randomly. Always been a thing associated with 165 ecms
I have TP5, paid edition. So I guess I'll also need TP4 right? Also need to download scannerpro or is that a part of TP4?

Can the log files generated by TP4 be used in TP5? I Really like TP5 and its flexibility for dashboards, tables, etc.
Old 06-26-2013, 10:59 AM
  #8  
Sponsor

iTrader: (92)
 
Tuned Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mile High Country !!!
Posts: 15,387
Received 642 Likes on 567 Posts
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

I have a few 165 ecm, one I use for a test bench. the 165 is luck of the draw on connection.
I would be curious to know how the 808 $12p. Depending on what .ads you are using you might need to the pause for silence to get rid of the data glitching.
Old 06-26-2013, 11:15 AM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
EvelBist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Originally Posted by Tuned Performance
I have a few 165 ecm, one I use for a test bench. the 165 is luck of the draw on connection.
I would be curious to know how the 808 $12p. Depending on what .ads you are using you might need to the pause for silence to get rid of the data glitching.
Mostly been using the 1227165_6E.ads from gearhead-efi's site. That file has Mark Mansur as its author, just guessing, but its probably ok

I have messed with adding the "listen for silence" at the end of the Mode1 macro, have gone from 10-90ms, some joy happened in the 15-25 range but those times when it connected were short lived.

What's the "808 $12p" ?
Old 06-26-2013, 11:26 AM
  #10  
Sponsor

iTrader: (92)
 
Tuned Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mile High Country !!!
Posts: 15,387
Received 642 Likes on 567 Posts
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

The 1227808 is a Holden commodore ecm used in austrailia. It is very similar to the 165. The $12p mask is speed density.
http://wbo2.com.au/~techedge.com.au/vehicle/1227808/
Old 06-26-2013, 12:05 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,748
Received 367 Likes on 296 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

As far as i know log files in tp5 are different than tp4. I never been able to view one with the other. File extensions for things are different between the two
Old 06-26-2013, 12:39 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
EvelBist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
As far as i know log files in tp5 are different than tp4. I never been able to view one with the other. File extensions for things are different between the two
Why cant things ever be easy
Old 06-26-2013, 12:42 PM
  #13  
Sponsor

iTrader: (92)
 
Tuned Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mile High Country !!!
Posts: 15,387
Received 642 Likes on 567 Posts
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

life wouldn't be fun without challenges
Old 06-26-2013, 12:48 PM
  #14  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
EvelBist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Originally Posted by Tuned Performance
life wouldn't be fun without challenges
right
Old 06-27-2013, 08:29 AM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
EvelBist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

TP4 connected once out of 8 tries - and even that for only a minute. I guess it must be my ECM.

I suppose I'm now looking for a 165 ECM that works. Gambling has never been good to me, so anyone have one they want to part with that works for sure?
Old 06-27-2013, 02:20 PM
  #16  
Sponsor

iTrader: (92)
 
Tuned Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mile High Country !!!
Posts: 15,387
Received 642 Likes on 567 Posts
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Sending pm
Old 06-27-2013, 06:17 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
MikeT 88IROC350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Guilford, NY
Posts: 786
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 w/TransGo
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73s
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

I use the latest ver of TP5, and $6E on my '88 IROC with the 165 ecm. It works ok, not perfect, but good enough for me to get meaningfull data. I tend to like using the most updated version of this software. It has to have the most up to date bug fixes.
Old 07-02-2013, 11:53 AM
  #18  
Sponsor

iTrader: (92)
 
Tuned Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mile High Country !!!
Posts: 15,387
Received 642 Likes on 567 Posts
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

The ecm and memcal I checked out on my test bench should be there maybe today.Lmk how it works
Old 07-08-2013, 05:42 PM
  #19  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
EvelBist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 'close to' stock 5.7 but trending>>
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Tried to leave a positive feedback for tunedperformance, but URL keeps coming up as fail.

Anyway, Brian is a great guy to deal with. He lent me a 165 ECM that he knew worked and a socketed memcal that I could plug my flash into, and it worked for me. My 165 Ecm was one of those "Luck of the draw" type that doesnt like to datalog. So I bought his at a reasonable price and now I'm happily logging and emulating and hopefully will be able to get the car running at its best. Thanks again Brian!
Old 07-28-2017, 03:32 PM
  #20  
Member

 
oddscrounger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (G92 package)
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Hey Brian you got any more of them good '165 ECMs lying around?
Old 07-28-2017, 03:54 PM
  #21  
Sponsor

iTrader: (92)
 
Tuned Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mile High Country !!!
Posts: 15,387
Received 642 Likes on 567 Posts
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

I have one ecm left but I think it's spoken for. I'll find out this weekend if the guy wants it. If not I'll put it on a test bench to see how it connects to tunerpro.
Old 07-28-2017, 03:56 PM
  #22  
Member

 
oddscrounger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (G92 package)
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E

Originally Posted by Tuned Performance
I have one ecm left but I think it's spoken for. I'll find out this weekend if the guy wants it. If not I'll put it on a test bench to see how it connects to tunerpro.
ok cool. Thanks bud. If not I'm going to hang it up this season and save up for a modern engine management system like XFI.
Old 09-28-2017, 12:19 PM
  #23  
Sponsor

iTrader: (92)
 
Tuned Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mile High Country !!!
Posts: 15,387
Received 642 Likes on 567 Posts
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E


Post #2 might apply
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tpi/...cm-issues.html

Last edited by Tuned Performance; 09-28-2017 at 12:22 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ULTM8Z
DIY PROM
12
10-02-2015 01:25 PM
MitcherNeaf
DIY PROM
3
09-24-2015 09:23 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
08-19-2015 10:29 PM
bamaboy0323
Tech / General Engine
2
08-15-2015 07:20 AM
IROCThe5.7L
DIY PROM
1
08-10-2015 11:24 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Tunerpro5 vs 4 datalogging $6E



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 PM.