DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Stayingin Closed loop at WOT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2002 | 07:22 PM
  #1  
89BlueTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Tecumseh,Mi,USA
Stayingin Closed loop at WOT

hey guys,

According to TECH1 my car is staying in closed loop at WOT, it is going into BLM cell 15, but it still reads closed loop. The fuel integrator is locking at 128, the BLM at 141. I was just wondering if anyt one had any ideas.


Also on a side note at any other throttle setting my BLM's are at 160, with a fuel integrator at 160-168. This is in every cell it tries to go into. If any one has any ideas let me know. I thought that maybe I had a vacuum leak, but could not find one.

Car is an 89 L98 MAF.

thanks guys
nick
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2002 | 08:29 PM
  #2  
Brent's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 921
Likes: 1
From: PA
Look at the "Learn Control" value. This is what turns off during WOT. Even thought Closed Loop stays active the learn proccess is off and the ECM is ignoring the O2 sensor during WOT.

The numbers indicate a lean condition. I'd look at fuel pressure and for leaks between the MAF and throttlebody for starters.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2002 | 08:55 PM
  #3  
89BlueTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Tecumseh,Mi,USA
Fuel pressure is rock solid at 47 psi, and I cannot find any airleaks. The integrators are locking and it appears to be functioning like it is in open loop. It just says closed loop still.

nick
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2002 | 09:27 PM
  #4  
Craig Moates's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
The BLMs max out at 160 right?

Have you diddled with your MAF sensor like cutting out the fins or removing the screens? If so, your MAF will read lower than the actual value, so the ECM will compensate by adding more fuel than that which is appropriate for the erroneous MAF reading. This'll give you lean conditions and force your BLMs high.

If this is the case, you can diddle your FI constants lower and that'll take care of things. You could also diddle your MAF tables, but that would be more troublesome although more accurate.

So? Any fancy ductwork around the MAF or missing material which would allow gases to bypass the sensor wire within the housing? Doesn't take much methinks.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2002 | 03:00 PM
  #5  
89BlueTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Tecumseh,Mi,USA
Yes I have gutted the MAF, I will look again for air leaks.

My main concern is why it is not switching to open loop at WOT,
the TPS is reading 4.40v, is that high enough?

thanks nick
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2002 | 05:14 PM
  #6  
Craig Moates's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
Just to restate, if you've gutted the MAF, you'll need to plug in a lower number for your FI size on the EPROM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2002 | 08:18 AM
  #7  
Ski89Z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Croydon, PA, USA
Originally posted by Craig Moates
Just to restate, if you've gutted the MAF, you'll need to plug in a lower number for your FI size on the EPROM.
So this is standard practice for a gutted MAF??
Hence I have 22# injectors then I need to set it to 19#????
Or I should monitor the BLMs to see first, I guess.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2002 | 09:16 AM
  #8  
Craig Moates's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
It's my experience, and it makes sense. Held true even when I changed out injectors and went with 24#ers. I'd bet it holds true for others like yourself.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2002 | 11:29 AM
  #9  
GregWestphal's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, MD
Car: '87 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 385 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Originally posted by 89BlueTA
Yes I have gutted the MAF, I will look again for air leaks.

My main concern is why it is not switching to open loop at WOT,
the TPS is reading 4.40v, is that high enough?

thanks nick
As Brent tried to explain, the Closed Loop flag will still remain on since all of the conditions for being in C/L are still being met while WOT. It's just that the computer used the Power Enrichment tables for the additional fuel being injected. 4.4 volts is definitely high enough for WOT, especially since PE can be engaged at a lower TPS value (it's based off of %TPS, not the voltage).

AFA having to change the injector constant due to modified MAF sensor, you probably won't have to change it more than 1 lb/hr. My injector constant is set at 25 lbs/hr for the SVO 24# injectors that actually flow more like 26 lbs/hr.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2002 | 11:37 AM
  #10  
89BlueTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Tecumseh,Mi,USA
Thanks for clearing that up for me everybody, the learn values due seem to lock, I just thought it was strange that it was staying in closed loop. I will not worry about it anymore and consider it normal.

Thanks for all the reply's it was very helpful!

nick
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2002 | 12:41 PM
  #11  
89BlueTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Tecumseh,Mi,USA
Ok guys, please due not get mad at me for bringing this up again, I am just trying to understand a little better.

But after thinking about this for a little longer, I was under the impression that one of the conditions for the car to be in closed loop. Was that the car not be at WOT. So if that was one of the conditions it should send the car to open loop at WOT.

Please correct me again if I am wrong, any input is greatly appreciated.

Nick
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2002 | 12:53 PM
  #12  
GregWestphal's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, MD
Car: '87 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 385 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Originally posted by 89BlueTA
Ok guys, please due not get mad at me for bringing this up again, I am just trying to understand a little better.

But after thinking about this for a little longer, I was under the impression that one of the conditions for the car to be in closed loop. Was that the car not be at WOT. So if that was one of the conditions it should send the car to open loop at WOT.

Please correct me again if I am wrong, any input is greatly appreciated.

Nick
There are 3 conditions to be met before the computer goes into closed loop: minimum coolant temp, minimum engine run time, and O2 sensor hysterisis (swing). The coolant temp is usually a little over 100 degrees F for most 350 TPI's. The run time varies depending on the start-up coolant temp, varying from 30-50 seconds for a hot engine to 300 seconds (5 minutes) for a cold engine (start-up temp less than 59 degrees F). The O2 swing is that the O2 sensor reading must drop below 200 mv or climb above 700 mv. Once these 3 conditions are met, the computer will go into closed loop. Technically, it won't be in closed loop at WOT since it isn't using the O2 sensor, but these 3 conditions are still being met.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2002 | 01:04 PM
  #13  
89BlueTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Tecumseh,Mi,USA
Thanks for the additional info Greg, it is really appreciated!

nick
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
hectre13
Car Audio
26
Mar 3, 2022 05:38 PM
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 PM.