power estimates
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 1983 firebird S/E
Engine: Built 350
Transmission: 700r4
power estimates
What power do you think this could achieve
Iron heads 170cc intake runners, Outflow Camelhump "fuelies"
Speed Pro (Federal-Mogul) Flat Top HP Pistons
Forged 5.7" Rods, Speed Pro (Federal-Mogul) Rings
Crane/Clevite 292 (duration @.050" 230I/230E, Lift: .480"I/.480"E, Lobe Seperation: 109) Hydrallic Flat Tappet High Performance Camshaft
Clevite Lifters
Elgin High Performance Valve Springs
Melling Pushrods
Professional Products Power Plus High Performance 360 Degree Aluminum High Rise Single Plane Intake Manifold
Carter 750 cfm Carb
HEI Distributor (with HP advance curve)
The car will have an automatic trans with true dual exhaust that will have an x-pipe and 2.5 inch piping, no ac, no emissions
If i left an vital info out let me know, otherwise take a guess at it. Thanks.
Iron heads 170cc intake runners, Outflow Camelhump "fuelies"
Speed Pro (Federal-Mogul) Flat Top HP Pistons
Forged 5.7" Rods, Speed Pro (Federal-Mogul) Rings
Crane/Clevite 292 (duration @.050" 230I/230E, Lift: .480"I/.480"E, Lobe Seperation: 109) Hydrallic Flat Tappet High Performance Camshaft
Clevite Lifters
Elgin High Performance Valve Springs
Melling Pushrods
Professional Products Power Plus High Performance 360 Degree Aluminum High Rise Single Plane Intake Manifold
Carter 750 cfm Carb
HEI Distributor (with HP advance curve)
The car will have an automatic trans with true dual exhaust that will have an x-pipe and 2.5 inch piping, no ac, no emissions
If i left an vital info out let me know, otherwise take a guess at it. Thanks.
Last edited by fbody83; Mar 10, 2003 at 10:25 AM.
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Ames, IA
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: Built 700R4
I put it into an engine analyzer program and came up with 355 lb/ft torque and 338 hp. I'd take that with a grain of salt though. That was with standard dyno running conditions as well (60 degrees/no humidity/at sealevel). Basically, this will probably be the most power you'd make. I also didn't know what compression you were running. I used 9:1. Also, the specs I put in weren't exactly what your engine has. Again, grain of salt.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 1983 firebird S/E
Engine: Built 350
Transmission: 700r4
Thanks man, the compression ratio is 9.5:1 if your wondering and the reason i ask this is because i dont know if they guy is tellin the truth about it. He doesn't have proof of it but he said the engine alone will make 375 to the crank. But i guess i will have to wait and see when i dyno it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sailtexas186548
Problems / Help / Suggestions / Comments
2
Aug 24, 2015 10:11 PM




