POLL 350 or GN V6
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
and how much does a gn v6 with turbo cost to pick up ????????? small blocks are a dime a dozen and everywhere thats the point of doin it and they have all the parts available to do the twin turbo and single turbo chips available and ready for purchase if you look i know for a fact and if you read that page i posted the url to you would also see that there is a carb adapter you can use and run a carb to do out the injection if you wanted to ...
and what exactly is the difference between swapping in a turbo v6 and adding a kit well id say its alot easier for one and then theres the whole aspect of changing exhaust and everything your gonna have to do to both motors and your wiring is gonnna cost ya for both (kits) either way im sayin that a v6 with turbo and a v8 with turbo built the same and proper ...is gonna be a no brainer man ....we can argue this to the point of death but its the truth you just dont wanna admit it
and what exactly is the difference between swapping in a turbo v6 and adding a kit well id say its alot easier for one and then theres the whole aspect of changing exhaust and everything your gonna have to do to both motors and your wiring is gonnna cost ya for both (kits) either way im sayin that a v6 with turbo and a v8 with turbo built the same and proper ...is gonna be a no brainer man ....we can argue this to the point of death but its the truth you just dont wanna admit it
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by fly89gta
which is pretty much the point I was trying to make from the very beginning.
which is pretty much the point I was trying to make from the very beginning.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
hey man the only point im tryin to make is that a v6 gn motor is not the feasable and easy way to build a turbo powered third gen firebird/camaro ......if you look into it its not that anymore expensive once youve rebuilt both engines and bought or rebuilt turbos and upgraded fuel delivery and exhaust and so on and so on ....and its alot nicer to have a v8 in your car than a v6 IMO......so with that said i hope we can all just get along if not oh well!!!!!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
hey man the only point im tryin to make is that a v6 gn motor is not the feasable and easy way to build a turbo powered third gen firebird/camaro
hey man the only point im tryin to make is that a v6 gn motor is not the feasable and easy way to build a turbo powered third gen firebird/camaro
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
nope sure havent but i got two friends that have and ive helped and its not worth the headache you have to deal with on em ...there both gettin ready to yank them out and put in 350s in now
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
hey man the only point im tryin to make is that a v6 gn motor is not the feasable and easy way to build a turbo powered third gen firebird/camaro ......if you look into it its not that anymore expensive once youve rebuilt both engines and bought or rebuilt turbos and upgraded fuel delivery and exhaust and so on and so on ....and its alot nicer to have a v8 in your car than a v6 IMO......so with that said i hope we can all just get along if not oh well!!!!!
hey man the only point im tryin to make is that a v6 gn motor is not the feasable and easy way to build a turbo powered third gen firebird/camaro ......if you look into it its not that anymore expensive once youve rebuilt both engines and bought or rebuilt turbos and upgraded fuel delivery and exhaust and so on and so on ....and its alot nicer to have a v8 in your car than a v6 IMO......so with that said i hope we can all just get along if not oh well!!!!!
You're entitled to your opinion but you're starting to talk out your *** when you say the GN swap isn't feasible because in reality it's not that complicated or hard.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by fly89gta
and you would know this how? Have you done a GN/TTA motor swap? Do you know what it takes to swap it in?
and you would know this how? Have you done a GN/TTA motor swap? Do you know what it takes to swap it in?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
EDIT: TGO's server sucks *****.
Anyway, no pissing contest here. Just stating that the swap isn't hard. No harder than swapping in another SBC :shrug:
Anyway, no pissing contest here. Just stating that the swap isn't hard. No harder than swapping in another SBC :shrug:
Last edited by fly89gta; May 4, 2004 at 03:45 PM.
OK, This is how I see it, May be right may be wrong, but since other people are showing thier a** I'll go ahead and show mine too. Lets look at the situation objectively.
#1 motor mounts. Will the GN motor line up on the 3.1 mounts? I dont know, but i seriously doubt it. If not, and you have to change mounts it would be the same amount, if not less work and money(I dont know what kind of fabbign is needed for GN) to put in mounts for a V8. 9.99 apiece from autozone, holes are already there.
#2 Computers. Safe to assume that most everything would have to be swapped. Wiring harneses, computers, etc, for it to work. I cant see the GN computer **** being any cheaper than stuff for a SBC. Same amount of work involved to switch it, maybe more for a GN cause it wasnt supposed to be there.
#3 Engine availabilty. I seriosly doubt you are going to touch a GN engine complete, for anything close to what you could get a good sbc for. Most people that have them wont get rid of them, and those that want to sell them want your first born child in payment.
#4 Room for improvement. I'm not starting a war here, i know the GN engines have a strong fan base, and there are lots of Aftermarket parts, but the SBC has the best aftermarket there is. IF you dont believe this, then you are retarded. Even ford or mopar guys will tell you that.
#5 Over all performance. With the same kind of mods, a GN V6 will not have a fighting chance against a turbo V8. Assuming the mods are across the board (head porting, cam, etc) the V6 jsut cant keep up. Even though it responds well to the mods, the 350 ci small block is gonna resond better cause its bigger. end of story.
#6 Over all cost. Yeah, the turbo kit is gonna be more for the v8. Its not gonna necesarily run 3K. You can get them cheaper, and what the hell is wrong with doing it yourself? A lot of other guys have, just looked at one today on here. The extra money spent on the V8 will easily be spent trying to find a GN motor. Then you will have to change the cam, and make all of the changes. The cost would probably work out to be about even.
The only problem with all of this is this: You spent the same amount of money to put in the GN that you would spend on a v8 turbo, and that v8 is gonna smoke you. Kinda seems stupid and pointless. But hey, its your coin man, blow it how you want it.
#1 motor mounts. Will the GN motor line up on the 3.1 mounts? I dont know, but i seriously doubt it. If not, and you have to change mounts it would be the same amount, if not less work and money(I dont know what kind of fabbign is needed for GN) to put in mounts for a V8. 9.99 apiece from autozone, holes are already there.
#2 Computers. Safe to assume that most everything would have to be swapped. Wiring harneses, computers, etc, for it to work. I cant see the GN computer **** being any cheaper than stuff for a SBC. Same amount of work involved to switch it, maybe more for a GN cause it wasnt supposed to be there.
#3 Engine availabilty. I seriosly doubt you are going to touch a GN engine complete, for anything close to what you could get a good sbc for. Most people that have them wont get rid of them, and those that want to sell them want your first born child in payment.
#4 Room for improvement. I'm not starting a war here, i know the GN engines have a strong fan base, and there are lots of Aftermarket parts, but the SBC has the best aftermarket there is. IF you dont believe this, then you are retarded. Even ford or mopar guys will tell you that.
#5 Over all performance. With the same kind of mods, a GN V6 will not have a fighting chance against a turbo V8. Assuming the mods are across the board (head porting, cam, etc) the V6 jsut cant keep up. Even though it responds well to the mods, the 350 ci small block is gonna resond better cause its bigger. end of story.
#6 Over all cost. Yeah, the turbo kit is gonna be more for the v8. Its not gonna necesarily run 3K. You can get them cheaper, and what the hell is wrong with doing it yourself? A lot of other guys have, just looked at one today on here. The extra money spent on the V8 will easily be spent trying to find a GN motor. Then you will have to change the cam, and make all of the changes. The cost would probably work out to be about even.
The only problem with all of this is this: You spent the same amount of money to put in the GN that you would spend on a v8 turbo, and that v8 is gonna smoke you. Kinda seems stupid and pointless. But hey, its your coin man, blow it how you want it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by fly89gta
Let me ask you something. Have you done either swaps? I can tell you from FIRST HAND experience the GN/TTA motor swap is NOT hard. A few people and a few days and the motor was in and running very well. Christ the fbody's came with the motor for christ sake.
You're entitled to your opinion but you're starting to talk out your *** when you say the GN swap isn't feasible because in reality it's not that complicated or hard.
Let me ask you something. Have you done either swaps? I can tell you from FIRST HAND experience the GN/TTA motor swap is NOT hard. A few people and a few days and the motor was in and running very well. Christ the fbody's came with the motor for christ sake.
You're entitled to your opinion but you're starting to talk out your *** when you say the GN swap isn't feasible because in reality it's not that complicated or hard.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Actually the crossmember is drilled for the buick V6 mounts 
That's all I'm gonna say. I don't have time to respond to the other stuff.
If everyone thinks a turbo'ed SBC is so easy then why aren't a lot more people running them? YES they are becoming more popular but by no means common.
I did the TTA swap and I'm happy with it. I'll be happy running my mid 11's for little spent.
BTW people the stock TTA stuff with some race gas can go into the 11's..(read:stock turbo,heads, intercooler etc).
Good day

That's all I'm gonna say. I don't have time to respond to the other stuff.
If everyone thinks a turbo'ed SBC is so easy then why aren't a lot more people running them? YES they are becoming more popular but by no means common.
I did the TTA swap and I'm happy with it. I'll be happy running my mid 11's for little spent.
BTW people the stock TTA stuff with some race gas can go into the 11's..(read:stock turbo,heads, intercooler etc).
Good day
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
you expect me to just drop it when you come at me like that tellin me that first of all there isnt a kit out there to put a 350 with turbos on a third gen then you jump all over me tryin to make it out that your the expert on turbo thirdgen v6 swaps well not everyone wants to have a v6 turbo in there car some of us would like to put a v8 turbo and its not any harder to do ....
you expect me to just drop it when you come at me like that tellin me that first of all there isnt a kit out there to put a 350 with turbos on a third gen then you jump all over me tryin to make it out that your the expert on turbo thirdgen v6 swaps well not everyone wants to have a v6 turbo in there car some of us would like to put a v8 turbo and its not any harder to do ....
That kit is fairly new and I didn't see it yet, sue me

I'm not an expert, never claimed to be. But I can tell you that I have a turbo thirdgen

Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
if the kit is fairly new and you didnt see it how did you miss it i posted it before all this whoo haa about v6 this and that is better ..????
oh yeah, after reading the entire thread, all i can say is that, there is absolutely no possible way you are going to get 600 rwhp out of 3.8 and still stay in the 25 mpg range, especially without an overdrive transmission.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
AMEN
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by ljnowell
oh yeah, after reading the entire thread, all i can say is that, there is absolutely no possible way you are going to get 600 rwhp out of 3.8 and still stay in the 25 mpg range, especially without an overdrive transmission.
oh yeah, after reading the entire thread, all i can say is that, there is absolutely no possible way you are going to get 600 rwhp out of 3.8 and still stay in the 25 mpg range, especially without an overdrive transmission.
Damn the personal attacks are getting rough, this one isnt an attack, just an observation. If you think that with your stock TTA you are gonna go to the track and run mid 11's you sir are lost. The only person you are lying to is yourself.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
if the kit is fairly new and you didnt see it how did you miss it i posted it before all this whoo haa about v6 this and that is better ..????
if the kit is fairly new and you didnt see it how did you miss it i posted it before all this whoo haa about v6 this and that is better ..????
lol Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by ljnowell
Damn the personal attacks are getting rough, this one isnt an attack, just an observation. If you think that with your stock TTA you are gonna go to the track and run mid 11's you sir are lost. The only person you are lying to is yourself.
Damn the personal attacks are getting rough, this one isnt an attack, just an observation. If you think that with your stock TTA you are gonna go to the track and run mid 11's you sir are lost. The only person you are lying to is yourself.
I said that the stock TTA components have gone into the 11's. Reread what I said a few posts up about that.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
oh and just to make something clear. I'm not saying a V8 turbo is pointless or stupid because it's probably my next project..so...um yeah
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by fly89gta
I didn't see it until you posted it...what don't you understand
lol
I didn't see it until you posted it...what don't you understand
lol why cant you admit that a v8 with the same equipment as a v6 is gonna smoke that v6
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by fly89gta
Actually the crossmember is drilled for the buick V6 mounts
That's all I'm gonna say. I don't have time to respond to the other stuff.
If everyone thinks a turbo'ed SBC is so easy then why aren't a lot more people running them? YES they are becoming more popular but by no means common.
I did the TTA swap and I'm happy with it. I'll be happy running my mid 11's for little spent.
BTW people the stock TTA stuff with some race gas can go into the 11's..(read:stock turbo,heads, intercooler etc).
Good day
Actually the crossmember is drilled for the buick V6 mounts

That's all I'm gonna say. I don't have time to respond to the other stuff.
If everyone thinks a turbo'ed SBC is so easy then why aren't a lot more people running them? YES they are becoming more popular but by no means common.
I did the TTA swap and I'm happy with it. I'll be happy running my mid 11's for little spent.
BTW people the stock TTA stuff with some race gas can go into the 11's..(read:stock turbo,heads, intercooler etc).
Good day
Ok you just said that a OK maybe i misread, but i believe this quote can be attributed to you. Any way, not gonna happen. Never did, never will. I guess that means that i shouldn't have any problems going into the 10's cause there have been SBC motors with standard bore that have done that, and thats what I have huh? Yes, the GN motor would be cool. NO it is not a cost effective way around the 350, and no with the same mods it will not beat the 350. I dotn know why you are still arguing about this. Its pointless.
BTW people the stock TTA stuff with some race gas can go into the 11's..(read:stock turbo,heads, intercooler etc).
oh, and by the way one more time 650 RWHP, no overdrive, 25 mpg, 11's with the 3.8 turbo. Bull crap. You can make that power, and you could run that time, but not cheap and certainly not the way you are implying.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
LOL, so TTA guys haven't gone into the 11's with the stock heads,cam,intake,intercooler, turbo etc? LOL...ok then...go read the turbo buick boards bud.
Let me clarify...when I said stock I meant the actual engine. Of course the exhaust and some other little things were done. That's my fault for not being more clear(and no I'm not being a smartass with that comment).
If you don't believe me you can ask one of the people that posted in this thread what his stock motored TTA ran. I'm sure he can enlighten you.
As far as the MPG comment. I don't think anyone said that you can get 25MPG...but you can get close provided you drive like a normal human being. Yes it's hard to say out of the boost(REAL hard actually, lol) but people are getting close to 20mpg(if you don't believe me oh well, I've seen it with my own eyes). To achieve that you DO have to drive like a grandmom..the more you romp on it the more you watch your gas needle drop lol
Let me clarify...when I said stock I meant the actual engine. Of course the exhaust and some other little things were done. That's my fault for not being more clear(and no I'm not being a smartass with that comment).
If you don't believe me you can ask one of the people that posted in this thread what his stock motored TTA ran. I'm sure he can enlighten you.
As far as the MPG comment. I don't think anyone said that you can get 25MPG...but you can get close provided you drive like a normal human being. Yes it's hard to say out of the boost(REAL hard actually, lol) but people are getting close to 20mpg(if you don't believe me oh well, I've seen it with my own eyes). To achieve that you DO have to drive like a grandmom..the more you romp on it the more you watch your gas needle drop lol
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by ljnowell
Ok you just said that a
Yes, the GN motor would be cool. NO it is not a cost effective way around the 350, and no with the same mods it will not beat the 350. I dotn know why you are still arguing about this. Its pointless.
Ok you just said that a
Yes, the GN motor would be cool. NO it is not a cost effective way around the 350, and no with the same mods it will not beat the 350. I dotn know why you are still arguing about this. Its pointless.
Also, how many conventional SBC's can go into the 9's on the stock crank and rods? I certainly wouldn't try that on a L98. I miss my L98 but to turbo that and do it right was not cost effective in my mind. Considering I did the TTA swap for a little less than just that turbo kit posted alone I think I'm ahead of the game. If you think that you can just slap together a turbo kit and throw it on a L98 and reign supreme then people are kidding themselves.
AGAIN I will say my whole point was that the 3.8 **** is already done, from the factory.
Last edited by fly89gta; May 4, 2004 at 04:35 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
as a matter of fact 650 RWHP, no overdrive, 25 mpg, 11's with the 3.8 turbo.
is what you said and i dont believe ya either about being able to get that much rear wheel horse power and good gas mileage at all even with a turbo ...LOL...now id believe it if you would post a copy "copy"of the time slip that showed you gettin those times and then show a dyno sheet showin those rearwheel horsepower numbers......bud
is what you said and i dont believe ya either about being able to get that much rear wheel horse power and good gas mileage at all even with a turbo ...LOL...now id believe it if you would post a copy "copy"of the time slip that showed you gettin those times and then show a dyno sheet showin those rearwheel horsepower numbers......bud
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
as a matter of fact 650 RWHP, no overdrive, 25 mpg, 11's with the 3.8 turbo.
is what you said and i dont believe ya either about being able to get that much rear wheel horse power and good gas mileage at all even with a turbo ...LOL...now id believe it if you would post a copy "copy"of the time slip that showed you gettin those times and then show a dyno sheet showin those rearwheel horsepower numbers......bud
as a matter of fact 650 RWHP, no overdrive, 25 mpg, 11's with the 3.8 turbo.
is what you said and i dont believe ya either about being able to get that much rear wheel horse power and good gas mileage at all even with a turbo ...LOL...now id believe it if you would post a copy "copy"of the time slip that showed you gettin those times and then show a dyno sheet showin those rearwheel horsepower numbers......bud
600hp and good gas mileage is a stretch but a turbo doesn't mean bad gas mileage. Actually on the Buick 3.8 if you stay out of the boost most of the time you can clock damn good gas mileage. My buddy has a 10 second GTA with a TTA motor swapped in and he gets 20mpg(around that, give or take a bit).
My friend who I was quoting them chimed in with his comments, thanks.
That would be me - 650hp, mid 10 second timeslips, and about 20mpg in a car thats driven everywhere
Thanks and play again.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
now id believe it if you would post a copy "copy"of the time slip that showed you gettin those times and then show a dyno sheet showin those rearwheel horsepower numbers......bud
now id believe it if you would post a copy "copy"of the time slip that showed you gettin those times and then show a dyno sheet showin those rearwheel horsepower numbers......bud
I'm sure Steve would be happy to post time slips if he has them scanned.(I don't think he does though) Cause you know he's making up all the fake numbers in his sig

I don't think he's ever been to the dyno though.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
nope sure havent but i got two friends that have and ive helped and its not worth the headache you have to deal with on em ...there both gettin ready to yank them out and put in 350s in now
nope sure havent but i got two friends that have and ive helped and its not worth the headache you have to deal with on em ...there both gettin ready to yank them out and put in 350s in now
What kind of problems are they having? I'm curious. The swap just isn't that hard. Are they having problems getting it to run right?
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by fly89gta
I'm sure Steve would be happy to post time slips if he has them scanned.(I don't think he does though) Cause you know he's making up all the fake numbers in his sig
I don't think he's ever been to the dyno though.
I'm sure Steve would be happy to post time slips if he has them scanned.(I don't think he does though) Cause you know he's making up all the fake numbers in his sig

I don't think he's ever been to the dyno though.
Thanks and play again.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by fly89gta
I didn't see this post by you.
What kind of problems are they having? I'm curious. The swap just isn't that hard. Are they having problems getting it to run right?
I didn't see this post by you.
What kind of problems are they having? I'm curious. The swap just isn't that hard. Are they having problems getting it to run right?
maybe you should read a little more..LOL
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
if hes never been to a dyno then how does he know how much horse power he has ?????....you can calculate all you want but the dyno doesnt lie..LOL....
Thanks and play again.
if hes never been to a dyno then how does he know how much horse power he has ?????....you can calculate all you want but the dyno doesnt lie..LOL....
Thanks and play again.
Also, I didn't say I had 650 horsepower, attack him not me.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
no there havin problems with the computer change and electrical problems but the one got most of the gremlins worked out and the other said screw it and bought a v8 and is gonna try the turbo rout on it now ....wish i had the money he does but i dont ......
maybe you should read a little more..LOL
no there havin problems with the computer change and electrical problems but the one got most of the gremlins worked out and the other said screw it and bought a v8 and is gonna try the turbo rout on it now ....wish i had the money he does but i dont ......
maybe you should read a little more..LOL

Like I said I must've missed some of your posts. Posting from work and not getting caught is hard damn work

Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by fly89gta
and your track time doesn't give you a good idea of the power the motor is making? Please..
Also, I didn't say I had 650 horsepower, attack him not me.
and your track time doesn't give you a good idea of the power the motor is making? Please..
Also, I didn't say I had 650 horsepower, attack him not me.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
yep have a good one same time tomorow ???
LOL
LOL
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
yep have a good one same time tomorow ???
LOL
yep have a good one same time tomorow ???
LOL
LOL j/k





Maybe the same time tomorrow...I think we've said all we can say
My parting shot is
ALL YOU GUYS ARE ****ING RETARDED...BUY A HONDA!!!
lol

One last thing though...if your friend(s) are having problems with their GN stuff tell them to email me or hit up the turbobuick sites(which I'm SURE they did lol)
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by ljnowell
Well, no matter what any of us think, aint none of us getting a honda. All of us thirdgen'ers have to keep some kind of standards
Well, no matter what any of us think, aint none of us getting a honda. All of us thirdgen'ers have to keep some kind of standards
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
i got all night ...LOL...im game
LMAO
LMAO
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
yeah i got chevys as far as the eye can see over here and there aint no room for a damn honda here..LOL
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
hey can you order that for me ....the one with the bull**** light is the one i want for my buddy .....LMAO......:rockon:
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: NY
Car: 2013 C63C
Engine: M156 (P31)
Transmission: 7 speed MCT
Axle/Gears: AMG Limited Slip
Wow 
First, let me say there is no doubt that an equally set up 350 inch motor will be more powerfull than an equally set up 231 inch motor. It has more cubic inches, period.
Now as for all of you calling bull****, come line up with my car. Neither I nor Tony said rear wheel horsepower, and I know I'm not making 650 at the rear wheels. I'm probrobly more like 500 ish at the wheels and 650ish at the motor. No I've never been on a dyno and have no intentions of going on one, to me it's track performance that matters and my car has gone 10.69@125.8 w/1.47 60ft. That was with 3.08 gears, running out of fuel with 55# injectors(about 25psi). You do the math, a 3,550 pound car running 10.6@125. I'd rather guess my horsepower and know my performance than be like all the LS1 and Supra guys that lay down 600-700-800hp and still only run 11's and 12's.
I dont have any timeslips scanned but I'd be more than happy to, for now here are a few video's from last year:
http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1075.MPG
http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1080.MPG
http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1082-123.MPG
http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1083-123.MPG
[url]http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1084-123-1.MPG[url]
http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1097.MPG
So yeah I'm making over 600hp, yes I get just over 20mpg, no it doesnt have an overdrive, and yes it's a streetcar thats driven everywhere. If you guys dont belive it come line up with me any time. I'll be driving to the track on Fri looking to get some 10.50's or better.

First, let me say there is no doubt that an equally set up 350 inch motor will be more powerfull than an equally set up 231 inch motor. It has more cubic inches, period.
Now as for all of you calling bull****, come line up with my car. Neither I nor Tony said rear wheel horsepower, and I know I'm not making 650 at the rear wheels. I'm probrobly more like 500 ish at the wheels and 650ish at the motor. No I've never been on a dyno and have no intentions of going on one, to me it's track performance that matters and my car has gone 10.69@125.8 w/1.47 60ft. That was with 3.08 gears, running out of fuel with 55# injectors(about 25psi). You do the math, a 3,550 pound car running 10.6@125. I'd rather guess my horsepower and know my performance than be like all the LS1 and Supra guys that lay down 600-700-800hp and still only run 11's and 12's.
I dont have any timeslips scanned but I'd be more than happy to, for now here are a few video's from last year:
http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1075.MPG
http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1080.MPG
http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1082-123.MPG
http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1083-123.MPG
[url]http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1084-123-1.MPG[url]
http://www.krif.com/tta/Movies/GTA1097.MPG
So yeah I'm making over 600hp, yes I get just over 20mpg, no it doesnt have an overdrive, and yes it's a streetcar thats driven everywhere. If you guys dont belive it come line up with me any time. I'll be driving to the track on Fri looking to get some 10.50's or better.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by thegeneral
?You do realize that when you're not in boost you're driving a 3.8 with 8.0:1 compression right...not exactly a gas guzzler lol.
The chip has A LOT to do with it to...



