v10 swap
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
v10 swap
Today I aquired half of a Viper (the front half). I also have another 2nd gen and a 3rd gen. In all honesty, and money is not a problem, what do you think of the idea of putting the v10 into one or the other. Since cash and labor is not an issue, it comes down to fit. I do know that anything can be done with the proper motivation and skill. I am just tossing the idea around in my head at this time, so I am looking for your opinions based on the technical attributes to doing this, not a bunch of "just put a 350 in it". Let's see what kind of real thought you all have.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
I've seen a pic/link from here that showed a racing camaro w/one in. Not much room left over, but it has been done. Did it come w/matching tranny, or do you already have a plan for that?
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
The car was hit by an 18 wheeler, took off the *** end, the trans housing is cracked, not sure about internals. I will have to get a new housing at the least.
I am going to hook up a fuel supply this weekend and see if I can get it running.
I am going to hook up a fuel supply this weekend and see if I can get it running.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
That is a lot of weight in the front end for a 3rd gen. It would be unique but I would save it for a mopar. I think you will end up getting the same "stick with chevy" attitudes.
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
I am a Chevy die hard, but they are half foreign anymore anyways, so why bother. Heck, my "genuine Harley" parts have the made in China stamp on them. This is about an idea, and intellectual thoughts on it, not opinions if it is right or wrong. I am just toying with the idea and thought maybe I could get a good conversation going just because. I will probably do it anyway, but why not get good minds going in the process.
Re: v10 swap
Originally posted by Lonestar
Today I aquired half of a Viper (the front half). I also have another 2nd gen and a 3rd gen. In all honesty, and money is not a problem, what do you think of the idea of putting the v10 into one or the other.
Today I aquired half of a Viper (the front half). I also have another 2nd gen and a 3rd gen. In all honesty, and money is not a problem, what do you think of the idea of putting the v10 into one or the other.
I think you should have no problem with the tranny... in fact arent the viper t-56's and GM t-56's the same?
Other than that, you can have someone fabricate the motor mounts and be doe with it.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
Whether or not I do the swap will be entirely my decision, I posted this as an avenue to induce thought from others on a subject that is not the norm. I am curious to everyone's input. Computer electronics is the biggest issue with something like this, I am lucky enough to have all that included. The actual fabrication is easy. I should get a decent digital camera sometime and post some good pics.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: Re: v10 swap
Originally posted by lokoRS
I think you should have no problem with the tranny... in fact arent the viper t-56's and GM t-56's the same?
I think you should have no problem with the tranny... in fact arent the viper t-56's and GM t-56's the same?
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
I'd put the engine as far back in the chassis as i could. Try and get it to the middle of car, that way you have a really low polar moment of inertia and really good handiling.
Maybe just a back into the firewall a little. Oh yeah you might want a rollcage too.
Maybe just a back into the firewall a little. Oh yeah you might want a rollcage too.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Your definatley gonna want a roll cage and sub frames, you need to stiffen that chassis up big time or risk twisting it. That would be one hell of a car if you do it. Don't let these nay sayers change your mind, throw that puppy in there. Samething happened with a guy who got a LT5, everyone told him not to waste his time, bah to them, just do it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Car: Kitt
Engine: Classified
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser/4:11
The T56 was originally designed to be put into the Viper. Then GM decided to put it into the F and Y cars. Ford has the T56 in the Cobra as well. I just think the bellhousing if a different pattern. This is what I understood. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Shifter may be in a different location. Don't think the vipers have the CAGS solenoid and they may contain more electronics. It may require making a new shifter hole, but big deal, get a hack saw and weld the old one back shut
.
. Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
If I go ahead with this project, I will probably fabricate an entire tube chassis to start. I would get a new housing for the stock tranny and rebuild it. I would probably move the firewall back to bring the weight more into proportion. I guess I just need to decide if I have the time for this intensive of a project right now.
How far back do you all think the engine should be relocated to get a better weight distribution. I am considering between 6" to a foot. I haven't done any calculations yet as I am still trying to finish my '85 right now.
How far back do you all think the engine should be relocated to get a better weight distribution. I am considering between 6" to a foot. I haven't done any calculations yet as I am still trying to finish my '85 right now.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 1
From: Huntsville, AL
Car: '00 Chevrolet Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
That is a lot of weight in the front end for a 3rd gen.
That is a lot of weight in the front end for a 3rd gen.
Originally posted by ghettosmurf
the only bad thing w/viper motors is they sound like crap unless you do some exhuast mods because they fire 2 cylinders at the same time...
the only bad thing w/viper motors is they sound like crap unless you do some exhuast mods because they fire 2 cylinders at the same time...
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
From: IL
Car: 91RS_92Z28
Engine: 5.0_5.7
Transmission: WCT5_WCT5
Axle/Gears: 3.08_3.42
Stock viper bodies twist like crazy, even if not raced. Our unibody would most likely not be up to it, esp. with all the cutting involved.
Dropping it in a full frame steel car or truck would be best.
I would make a bike out of it, or one nasty gocart if you want to go nutts.
Someone post a link or pic to the supposed mythical
"racing camaro" v-10 that somewhere exists.
Dropping it in a full frame steel car or truck would be best.
I would make a bike out of it, or one nasty gocart if you want to go nutts.
Someone post a link or pic to the supposed mythical
"racing camaro" v-10 that somewhere exists.
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
If I decide to do this swap, I will build a full tube chassis for it. I figure something like this would have to be first class. Obviously the stock unibody would never handle it...heck it won't handle my 327.
I just think it would be fun, but I am leaning toward my 2nd gen for the project.
I just think it would be fun, but I am leaning toward my 2nd gen for the project.
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: BC Canada
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: 700r4
I think you would be better off trying for the second gen. Reason being that the second gen is better built for larger engines. Its a tank afterall 
I imagine the frame would be a little stronger as well.
But thats just IMHO.
You must be pretty well off to have just come across a 1/2 a Viper.. not to mention being one of the rare people here who actually have no worries about money spent for an engine swap.
:hail:

I imagine the frame would be a little stronger as well.
But thats just IMHO.
You must be pretty well off to have just come across a 1/2 a Viper.. not to mention being one of the rare people here who actually have no worries about money spent for an engine swap.
:hail:
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
You must be pretty well off to have just come across a 1/2 a Viper.. not to mention being one of the rare people here who actually have no worries about money spent for an engine swap.
Just a lot of education and lucky enough to get a good job.
I am leaning toward the 2nd gen
Just a lot of education and lucky enough to get a good job.
I am leaning toward the 2nd gen
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 954
Likes: 1
From: Annandale, VA
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: 2001 LS1 Modded
Transmission: 2001 4L60E Yank SS3600 TC
This swap has been done before. Search the archives there were a few pictures posted. The car was a yellow Z28.
Look here:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...&highlight=v10
Look here:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...&highlight=v10
Last edited by wm_sorg; May 27, 2004 at 10:53 AM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
heres how to **** off everyone.
aquire a honda CRX.
backhalf it, and mate the cage with the backhalf and the new front subframe.
install the V10 in that.
make it as daily driver as you can while maintaining it track legal.
go race it in the import classes... hey, the engine is german, and the chassis is from japan... why not?
aquire a honda CRX.
backhalf it, and mate the cage with the backhalf and the new front subframe.
install the V10 in that.
make it as daily driver as you can while maintaining it track legal.
go race it in the import classes... hey, the engine is german, and the chassis is from japan... why not?
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by pasky
Im sure he came to a thirdgen board to throw it in a import
Im sure he came to a thirdgen board to throw it in a import
domestic guys hate it.
import guys hate it.
yet, they all feel strangly attracted to it.
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 88 TBI Formula, 98 LS1 TA, 77 400 T
Second gens are a little more flexible than third gens. Second gens like the first gens are true sub frame cars, where the third gens are unit body. If you have everseen a first gen with a ripped quarter you know that it has a big block and no subframe connectors.
Although the engine bay is a little wider once the inner fenders are cut. Either way you go you will need subframe connectors and possibly a roll cage to tie things together.
Although the engine bay is a little wider once the inner fenders are cut. Either way you go you will need subframe connectors and possibly a roll cage to tie things together.
Second gens are a little more flexible than third gens. Second gens like the first gens are true sub frame cars, where the third gens are unit body. If you have everseen a first gen with a ripped quarter you know that it has a big block and no subframe connectors.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
i say throw that v-10 in there i wanna see some pics of that bad boy goin in i bet it would be a screamer
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by ershealy
Second gens are a little more flexible than third gens. Second gens like the first gens are true sub frame cars, where the third gens are unit body. If you have everseen a first gen with a ripped quarter you know that it has a big block and no subframe connectors.
Although the engine bay is a little wider once the inner fenders are cut. Either way you go you will need subframe connectors and possibly a roll cage to tie things together.
Second gens are a little more flexible than third gens. Second gens like the first gens are true sub frame cars, where the third gens are unit body. If you have everseen a first gen with a ripped quarter you know that it has a big block and no subframe connectors.
Although the engine bay is a little wider once the inner fenders are cut. Either way you go you will need subframe connectors and possibly a roll cage to tie things together.
UMmm, wasn't the f-body always a unibody?
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
Originally posted by pasky
UMmm, wasn't the f-body always a unibody?
UMmm, wasn't the f-body always a unibody?
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by pasky
UMmm, wasn't the f-body always a unibody?
UMmm, wasn't the f-body always a unibody?
however, early unibody cars, like the 1st and 2nd gens, had the front subframe bolt on and off... unlike 3rd and 4thgens where its tack welded to the unibody.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 350 LT1
Transmission: T56
i'd say put her to it.. however.. just keep in mind.. 572.. if things get real hard, you can sell the viper, fall back on a done up 572.. and have a dam fast car.. although you can't say it has a viper motor in it.. and being able to say that is too cool... if room is a problem, cut out the fenders and brace it up.. and get a rear end out of a mack truck.
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: Augusta Georgia
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 95 350 LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
sell that freaky mutated 10 cylinder version of Chrysler 318, take the money and build an A kickin chevy motor. How about a big cube smallblock or a big block crate motor.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by SERPENT99
sell that freaky mutated 10 cylinder version of Chrysler 318, take the money and build an A kickin chevy motor. How about a big cube smallblock or a big block crate motor.
sell that freaky mutated 10 cylinder version of Chrysler 318, take the money and build an A kickin chevy motor. How about a big cube smallblock or a big block crate motor.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Car: 92' RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9-bolt
I dont think the weight would be too much of an issue, I think fotment would be the biggest problem, thought if you have the moeny like you say you do, I am sure getting new motor mounts and trans xmember and custom drive shaft would be no problem, I say go for it, certainly would be unique.
The only other engine I ma prefer would be the GMMP 427.
The only other engine I ma prefer would be the GMMP 427.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by 92RS shearn
I dont think the weight would be too much of an issue, I think fotment would be the biggest problem, thought if you have the moeny like you say you do, I am sure getting new motor mounts and trans xmember and custom drive shaft would be no problem, I say go for it, certainly would be unique.
The only other engine I ma prefer would be the GMMP 427.
I dont think the weight would be too much of an issue, I think fotment would be the biggest problem, thought if you have the moeny like you say you do, I am sure getting new motor mounts and trans xmember and custom drive shaft would be no problem, I say go for it, certainly would be unique.
The only other engine I ma prefer would be the GMMP 427.
heck if he just bought a viper parts car then i dont think money is an isssue for him anyway....
lol
i wonder if he wants to adopt a 30 year old son or brother ..lol...
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Car: 1985 Camaro, 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L carbed and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 and 3.27 posi
Originally posted by 92RS shearn
I dont think the weight would be too much of an issue, I think fotment would be the biggest problem, thought if you have the moeny like you say you do, I am sure getting new motor mounts and trans xmember and custom drive shaft would be no problem, I say go for it, certainly would be unique.
The only other engine I ma prefer would be the GMMP 427.
I dont think the weight would be too much of an issue, I think fotment would be the biggest problem, thought if you have the moeny like you say you do, I am sure getting new motor mounts and trans xmember and custom drive shaft would be no problem, I say go for it, certainly would be unique.
The only other engine I ma prefer would be the GMMP 427.
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
I think it would be even cooler to have a GM V10, GM's thinking of making a V10 which would be cool to drop in a thirdgen. I was at the GM's powertrain prototype plant in Michigan about a week ago and they had a lot of 10 cylinders versions of the LS1's blocks and heads sitting around in the production area. Don't know if they will ever put it in anything but who knows.
I say drop that viper engine in! It would be awesome and probably is the same weight as an iron SBC if not lighter because the viper block is aluminum. Should make for some definite fun and bragging rights.
I say drop that viper engine in! It would be awesome and probably is the same weight as an iron SBC if not lighter because the viper block is aluminum. Should make for some definite fun and bragging rights.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Car: 92' RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9-bolt
Originally posted by RSFreak
I agree, except if not the Viper engine, I'd go with the GMMP 572!
I agree, except if not the Viper engine, I'd go with the GMMP 572!
I didn't know they made a 572, what special edition car/truck did they build it for?
I'd love to build a 427 clone, but the block alone is like $9k
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
the 572 is a crate engine that is sold by gm now you can get it in a couple different forms .
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Car: 92' RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9-bolt
Originally posted by thegeneral
the 572 is a crate engine that is sold by gm now you can get it in a couple different forms .
the 572 is a crate engine that is sold by gm now you can get it in a couple different forms .
GMMP makes special edition cars like the '02 ZL1, they hand built the 427 engines for them, and they aren't available for sale individually, they only make them for the special edition camaros. Which cost some $80k
It makes over 600 HP
427, modified LS6 intake and heads
Last edited by 92RS shearn; Jun 1, 2004 at 12:25 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
dont know then maybe it was a typo
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Originally posted by 92RS shearn
GMMP makes special edition cars like the '02 ZL1, they hand built the 427 engines for them, and they aren't available for sale individually, they only make them for the special edition camaros. Which cost some $80k
GMMP makes special edition cars like the '02 ZL1, they hand built the 427 engines for them, and they aren't available for sale individually, they only make them for the special edition camaros. Which cost some $80k




