1982 camaro: 305 to 350
1982 camaro: 305 to 350
I have a 1982 camaro that is giving me a ton of problems because of what the previous owner did. And I'm probably going to be swapping engines and I thought that I might as well put in a 350 while I'm at it. I want to get a newer engine because most of the time the newer it is the faster it is. And I don't want another crossfire injection engine. So my question is, what is the newest 350 engine I can get without having to change the computer or make other spendy changes.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Welcome aboard thirdgen.org.
About 1983.
The crossfire ECM was unique to crossfire. The factory quit making it after 1983.
If you get a take-out 350, most of the time they'll include the computer. Even if you have to get it separately, they don't cost that much.
The crossfire ECM was unique to crossfire. The factory quit making it after 1983.
If you get a take-out 350, most of the time they'll include the computer. Even if you have to get it separately, they don't cost that much.
On Probation
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: 1982 camaro: 305 to 350
I disagree. If your car is curently wearing cross-fire, then swapping in a TBI engine will be as easy as going carbureted. However, the TBI 350s used in GM's big cars only offer about 200 horses. Going with a carbureted 350, in perfectly legal trim, won't give you any more than 200, unless you copy the old ZZ3 package, not cheap, but if you copy the way GMPP offered it, it's 308 horses and 50-state legal. Best bang for the buck would be find a good used Vortec 350 from a '96-'98 fullsize halfton, add one of GM's external-EGR-capable intakes, either the carbureted one or the TBI one, and go from there.
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: kansas
Car: 82' z28/03' eddie bauer explorer
Engine: 355-395hp/4.6v8
Transmission: Built 700R4/5speed auto 4x4
Axle/Gears: 3.42LSD/3.73
Re: 1982 camaro: 305 to 350
just because a engine is newer doesn't mean it's faster, they have better technology but my 69' block factory had around 350hp depends what car you get it from, I had the cross fire injection in my car and I hated it always had problems with it, you can build a 350 from any car just look up your states regulations lucky for me I live in Kansas and can almost do anything
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
You really aren't disagreeing. I never said anything about carb or TBI, or what the 350 would come from.
But, the OP is concerned about changing the ECM. Don't be. It isn't that big of a deal, and isn't that expensive. Buy a complete engine, and like I said, most likely they'll throw in the harness and computer at no extra charge (especially if you are pulling the engine).
Your '69 block factory had about 275 HP measure the same way 3rd gen HP was rated. Sorry to burst your bubble, but they changed the HP rating requirements in 1971.
Where you live has nothing to do with what's legal. The regulations are federal, not state. The fact that they don't inspect or test in Kansas doesn't change what is or isn't legal.
And, some day, you may not be in Kansas anymore. . .
But, the OP is concerned about changing the ECM. Don't be. It isn't that big of a deal, and isn't that expensive. Buy a complete engine, and like I said, most likely they'll throw in the harness and computer at no extra charge (especially if you are pulling the engine).
Your '69 block factory had about 275 HP measure the same way 3rd gen HP was rated. Sorry to burst your bubble, but they changed the HP rating requirements in 1971.
And, some day, you may not be in Kansas anymore. . .
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: kansas
Car: 82' z28/03' eddie bauer explorer
Engine: 355-395hp/4.6v8
Transmission: Built 700R4/5speed auto 4x4
Axle/Gears: 3.42LSD/3.73
Re: 1982 camaro: 305 to 350
my car has been inspected by the high patrol and it passed just fine all there were concerned about if it had catalytic converters witch mine does and dont worry your not bursting anybodies bubble all I did was ran the vin on the block and that's what it showed if it's wrong so be it but the current 395hp isn't dynos don't lie
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
It's trying to compare 350 apples to 170 oranges, that's all.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: moberly, Mo
Car: 91 rs
Engine: 383 290 cam aed carb
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 4.10 ticking time bomb
Re: 1982 camaro: 305 to 350
You really aren't disagreeing. I never said anything about carb or TBI, or what the 350 would come from.
But, the OP is concerned about changing the ECM. Don't be. It isn't that big of a deal, and isn't that expensive. Buy a complete engine, and like I said, most likely they'll throw in the harness and computer at no extra charge (especially if you are pulling the engine).
Your '69 block factory had about 275 HP measure the same way 3rd gen HP was rated. Sorry to burst your bubble, but they changed the HP rating requirements in 1971.
Where you live has nothing to do with what's legal. The regulations are federal, not state. The fact that they don't inspect or test in Kansas doesn't change what is or isn't legal.
And, some day, you may not be in Kansas anymore. . .
But, the OP is concerned about changing the ECM. Don't be. It isn't that big of a deal, and isn't that expensive. Buy a complete engine, and like I said, most likely they'll throw in the harness and computer at no extra charge (especially if you are pulling the engine).
Your '69 block factory had about 275 HP measure the same way 3rd gen HP was rated. Sorry to burst your bubble, but they changed the HP rating requirements in 1971.
Where you live has nothing to do with what's legal. The regulations are federal, not state. The fact that they don't inspect or test in Kansas doesn't change what is or isn't legal.
And, some day, you may not be in Kansas anymore. . .
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
(Should I bother responding? I'd just be repeating myself. Yes, I guess I will. . .)
It may be legal according to state-imposed safety laws, but it is still illegal in the United States. There is no such thing as an "emissions state" or a "non-emissions state". We live in an emissions country.
It may be legal according to state-imposed safety laws, but it is still illegal in the United States. There is no such thing as an "emissions state" or a "non-emissions state". We live in an emissions country.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: moberly, Mo
Car: 91 rs
Engine: 383 290 cam aed carb
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 4.10 ticking time bomb
Re: 1982 camaro: 305 to 350
Well, you are not 100 percent correct, because some states, especially california, have more strict emissions laws than the rest of the country. Some states, and districts require you to pass an emissions test to pass an inspection, here in my part of MO you do not have to pass an emission test, it is not a requirment of the local government.
I do know that my car is illegal for not having an intact emissons system, but if I have no problem getting my car legal without it then why shoul I bother, I do not forsee goverment agents coming to my house and confinscating my car!
I do know that my car is illegal for not having an intact emissons system, but if I have no problem getting my car legal without it then why shoul I bother, I do not forsee goverment agents coming to my house and confinscating my car!
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
True, California is allowed to have more strict emissions laws.
But, we have or will soon have a new "Green Czar" - he might not see things quite your way. His claim to fame was following San Francisco cops around with a video camera, editing what he shot to make it appear as though they were a bunch of goons. Not sure I'd relax, if I were you.
But, we have or will soon have a new "Green Czar" - he might not see things quite your way. His claim to fame was following San Francisco cops around with a video camera, editing what he shot to make it appear as though they were a bunch of goons. Not sure I'd relax, if I were you.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: moberly, Mo
Car: 91 rs
Engine: 383 290 cam aed carb
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 4.10 ticking time bomb
Re: 1982 camaro: 305 to 350
True, California is allowed to have more strict emissions laws.
But, we have or will soon have a new "Green Czar" - he might not see things quite your way. His claim to fame was following San Francisco cops around with a video camera, editing what he shot to make it appear as though they were a bunch of goons. Not sure I'd relax, if I were you.
But, we have or will soon have a new "Green Czar" - he might not see things quite your way. His claim to fame was following San Francisco cops around with a video camera, editing what he shot to make it appear as though they were a bunch of goons. Not sure I'd relax, if I were you.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zachattack0925
Tech / General Engine
2
Aug 12, 2015 09:54 PM
Zachattack0925
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Aug 12, 2015 09:52 PM






