Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Hi guys,
After talking to a good number of people, I've decided I want to build a 383 Stroker for my Z, rather than just dropping another, already built motor in it. I have a basic idea of bore and stroke numbers and what heads I want, but beyond that I'm pretty clueless (I've always been a sheet metal guy). I've looked through several build pages on this site, but most of the specs are complete greek to me.
Basically I'm building my project car as more as a ridiculously loud (straight piped, obviously), healthy sounding, weekend night downtown cruiser. Right from the start, I'm finding myself doing lots of research into different blocks. I've got lots of numbers, but again, I have no idea what they all mean. I really don't want to get into the 2-bolt vs 4-bolt argument that I've seen 100 times, but it seems everywhere I go, 4-bolts are the standard. Yes, I would like to have all new parts.
What I'm asking is for pointers in the right direction with this build. While I've rebuilt engines before, I'm definitely no performance builder, so any advice is appreciated! I'm not setting a dollar limit yet, but I'm also not spending $2k on just a block. I'm not looking to make 500hp, but I'm also not wanting to cruise around making 200hp either. I'd like to have the whole motor planned out before I start buying parts, as well. The only thing I've really got a bias towards right now is L31 heads. Even those aren't 100% yet, as I don't REALLY know if they're what I want.
One last question: I found a piece of software online called "Engine Builder 3d". Supposedly it has a huge database of parts that you can throw together to make a virtual SBC then get a readout of the projected numbers. Has anybody tried this?
Link:
http://www.virtualengine2000.com/EngineBuilder3D.htm
Sorry for making this such a long post, but I'm completely ignorant in this category. I'd be glad to answer any questions you guys have.
After talking to a good number of people, I've decided I want to build a 383 Stroker for my Z, rather than just dropping another, already built motor in it. I have a basic idea of bore and stroke numbers and what heads I want, but beyond that I'm pretty clueless (I've always been a sheet metal guy). I've looked through several build pages on this site, but most of the specs are complete greek to me.
Basically I'm building my project car as more as a ridiculously loud (straight piped, obviously), healthy sounding, weekend night downtown cruiser. Right from the start, I'm finding myself doing lots of research into different blocks. I've got lots of numbers, but again, I have no idea what they all mean. I really don't want to get into the 2-bolt vs 4-bolt argument that I've seen 100 times, but it seems everywhere I go, 4-bolts are the standard. Yes, I would like to have all new parts.
What I'm asking is for pointers in the right direction with this build. While I've rebuilt engines before, I'm definitely no performance builder, so any advice is appreciated! I'm not setting a dollar limit yet, but I'm also not spending $2k on just a block. I'm not looking to make 500hp, but I'm also not wanting to cruise around making 200hp either. I'd like to have the whole motor planned out before I start buying parts, as well. The only thing I've really got a bias towards right now is L31 heads. Even those aren't 100% yet, as I don't REALLY know if they're what I want.
One last question: I found a piece of software online called "Engine Builder 3d". Supposedly it has a huge database of parts that you can throw together to make a virtual SBC then get a readout of the projected numbers. Has anybody tried this?
Link:
http://www.virtualengine2000.com/EngineBuilder3D.htm
Sorry for making this such a long post, but I'm completely ignorant in this category. I'd be glad to answer any questions you guys have.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 1
From: St.Louis, IL
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 377
Transmission: TH350; Circle D 4200 converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
You need to have a definitive budget set in mind or you're going to get some VASTLY different builds. What can you comfortably afford? Once you establish that, we can go from there. Going fast isn't cheap.
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: indiana
Car: 87 Iroc
Engine: 305 for now
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt posi 3.08 gears
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
if your looking for simple cheap and decent power id go with some vortec heads high rise intake carb nice cam and some headers should put you anywhere from 350-450hp depending on cam compression ratio and all that good stuff im not an engine builder though just what ive read on line when i was researching to build one btw dont know if you know or not but if you do go with the vortec heads you need a special intake to fit them
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated

And other MINOR details like what trans / stall /gears ?
what induction?
have to past testing ? ,
worried about fuel economy?
A million and one 383 builds documented out there ; not all achieve the same results
FWIW you will be using a reg SBC 350 block ( unless you have $$ to waste )
( L31 Vortec block; cheap and common in junkyards , has roller cam ; likely to be 4 bolt) to make your 383
Or you buy this block ,already machined to put your shiny new 383 parts into
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-150100/
Last edited by vetteoz; May 29, 2012 at 02:53 AM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
I have a Holley 650cfm carb I would like to put on it, but it's not set in stone. I'd like to stay away from fuel injection and a lot of the more modern niceties. Personally I like the oldschool look.
NC laws don't require emissions testing for anything older than 96 so that's a plus.
For a non-dd, weekend fun machine fuel economy isn't really a big deal. Matter of fact I was going to ask about using super high unleaded fuel. I can get 115 no problem.
Or you buy this block ,already machined to put your shiny new 383 parts into
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-150100/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-150100/
Now, I also am looking for a more racy sound out of this thing more than super burn up the track performance. I've heard mixed reviews about the thumpr series cam. Most people say it sounds great, but doesn't make the 500+ hp they want. Fine by me. I'm thinking around 300 is a good number to shoot for. Enough to get into trouble, but not SERIOUS trouble

Maybe I'm asking a lot from this but it's simply from ignorance when it comes to building performance motors. TIA for the input, and those who have spoken up already!
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 1
From: St.Louis, IL
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 377
Transmission: TH350; Circle D 4200 converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
$1,500 is potentially doable for your goals but you really need to know what you're doing and shop like a pro, otherwise you're going to go over budget very quickly. You're probably going to need to buy used parts to accomplish it, though; not that it's a bad thing by any means.. just be smart about it. I'd say you're skimming it with that budget, though.. and if you want quality parts I'd say you need to expect about 2,500-3,000 once everything is said and done.
Oh, and stay away from Thumpr and Edelbrock cams in general.. they're trash. Get something from Comp, Bullet, or Lunati (preferrably the last two). Harold Brookshire did all the major designs for all three of those companies (like the XE's with comp, and then the VOODOO's with Lunati) and his most recent grinds are with Lunati.
Oh, and stay away from Thumpr and Edelbrock cams in general.. they're trash. Get something from Comp, Bullet, or Lunati (preferrably the last two). Harold Brookshire did all the major designs for all three of those companies (like the XE's with comp, and then the VOODOO's with Lunati) and his most recent grinds are with Lunati.
Trending Topics
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Now, I also am looking for a more racy sound out of this thing more than super burn up the track performance. I've heard mixed reviews about the thumpr series cam. Most people say it sounds great, but doesn't make the 500+ hp they want. Fine by me. I'm thinking around 300 is a good number to shoot for. Enough to get into trouble, but not SERIOUS trouble
My cam was sorta thumper like, 230/245 on a 109 but with big .603/.613" lift. Sounded evil, drove docile, and ran like an ape who's butt hurts. 400whp, 11.4's ET's at 119mph best trap.
1500 is more than likely gonna be eaten up in the bottom end alone. After you buy the block and rotating assembly, you'll have no money left over for head work/cam/all the other small parts needed

you may beable to get away with stock reconditioned rods and cheap cast crank with some cheap budget hyper pistons... depending where you shop around but i'd balance the assembly for certain which can be a 200-300 dollar job right there. machine/size the old rods with new 8740 ARP rod bolts can cost a few hundred. It all adds up.
But in the end you'll like what you have
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Has anybody else tried any of the Thumpr cams? I'm interested in feedback on them. Like I said, I've read mixed reviews. What kind of options do I have for valvetrain with L31 heads?
Also, vetteoz, that block is currently unavailable or it would be on its way.
As for budget, I had a ballpark number and no deadline. If I have to save up a little bit to build this thing the right way then so be it. I'm putting away a few hundred a month for my project.
Also, vetteoz, that block is currently unavailable or it would be on its way.
As for budget, I had a ballpark number and no deadline. If I have to save up a little bit to build this thing the right way then so be it. I'm putting away a few hundred a month for my project.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Joe Sherman racing engines has done a few 383's with AFR 210 heads and the ***** thumpr cams, 235/249 on a 107lsa. Had the idle of a race car but still made torque and good power. They do work alright. Now your L31 heads will limit hp and rpm so you may want to run the base thumpr cam with less duration. I think it would be a fun combo. Just get a dish piston to keep compression below 10 to 1
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Well I definitely don't want a dog, either. Any ballpark estimates on what kind of numbers I'd be looking at with this configuration?
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
It wont be a dog. It should be north of 400hp on motor but under 450. Somewhere in there.
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Yeah.The fact some cam companies are building cams for the sole reason of "sound".That is sooooooooooooooo bricer that ignores the last 20yrs of what we have learned about the overheads.Man that bugs the hell out of me.

Last edited by 1gary; Jun 1, 2012 at 07:37 PM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
What's wrong with a cam made for sound? I want this motor to sound good without being a maintenance nightmare or being too powerful for its own good. If I want to go fast or just get my adrenaline up a bit, I have a kart that I race. I never really liked drag racing and that's not what this car is going to be used for.
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
My answer is the whole history of Hot Rodding has always been performance first and if done right the sound of the engine was a result of that.To install a cam for the sound of it is a false premiss filled with mind games.I think it is dishonest.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
1gary,
I don't want a race motor (because of the cost and maintenance that's involved in it), but I want it to sound like one. I want something with some kick over the stock motor, and I want to build it myself. I'm not putting many miles on the car, and they won't be race miles, either. This is a project my dad and I are working on together (when I'm home, anyway). It wouldn't be as fun to just drop a crate 350 in it. If I'm more worried about the sound than the performance, that's my prerogative. I'm sure I'm not the only one with this opinion. How do I know this? There are lines of cams created JUST for the sound they create. If this bothers you, kindly unsubscribe from this thread and stop reading it.
On to another question: I think I'm set now on the block (specs at least) and heads I want, now I'm on to valve train. I've read that there are different types. i.e. solid roller, hydraulic roller, hydraulic lifter, etc. Also, I've read that there are different types of rocker arms as well. What are my options with using the L31 heads?
I don't want a race motor (because of the cost and maintenance that's involved in it), but I want it to sound like one. I want something with some kick over the stock motor, and I want to build it myself. I'm not putting many miles on the car, and they won't be race miles, either. This is a project my dad and I are working on together (when I'm home, anyway). It wouldn't be as fun to just drop a crate 350 in it. If I'm more worried about the sound than the performance, that's my prerogative. I'm sure I'm not the only one with this opinion. How do I know this? There are lines of cams created JUST for the sound they create. If this bothers you, kindly unsubscribe from this thread and stop reading it.
On to another question: I think I'm set now on the block (specs at least) and heads I want, now I'm on to valve train. I've read that there are different types. i.e. solid roller, hydraulic roller, hydraulic lifter, etc. Also, I've read that there are different types of rocker arms as well. What are my options with using the L31 heads?
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Yepper.Cam manufactures have reached a new low with the offer of "sounds like" cams but isn't.You out grow that fast the first time you get slapped hard in a stop light street race.It's kind of embarrassing.
Look,if you really want me off your thread,no problem.Just know your asking yrs of doing this stuff to ignore what you want.Might want to think about that some.
I'll end this post with a thought for you.Just be true to yourself...........OK??.
Look,if you really want me off your thread,no problem.Just know your asking yrs of doing this stuff to ignore what you want.Might want to think about that some.
I'll end this post with a thought for you.Just be true to yourself...........OK??.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Summit roller cam block above lets you have roller ( preferred ) or flat tappet cam.
Old style (<'86) block is flat tappet only unless you want to spend big $$ to convert it to roller cam
Originally Posted by flash2042;5291252,
I've read that there are different types of rocker arms as well.
What are my options with using the L31 heads?
What are my options with using the L31 heads?
If putting a new cam in ,then 1.5 rockers . 1.6 rockers are for those wanting more valve lift without swapping the cam out
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Already did that with the 305 in there now. It sounds...ok, but definitely not what I'm looking for.

Thanks for the info!
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
I'm more on your side than it seems.When people around you find the car isn't as bad bass as it sounds,it reflects badly on you as the builder of the car.Worst case is they might say so to your face,but behind your back.To have a high performance street car you build doesn't mean you have to use it and get in trouble with the law.Heck,you could buy a new factory rod,but that shouldn't mean it ends up in the impound lot for you doing something really dumb.
If you follow the advise of this forum and build a parts matched well planned out build,each time you get behind the wheel you have the pride of what you learned about it and working to build it is as much of the fun as driving it.You know that in no way have you short changed the very fabric that has been apart of hot rodding by a cam and it doesn't need to be expensive to be relativity done right.
Your in the right forum to get there here.Many of the members here are well equipped to get your build done right.
If you follow the advise of this forum and build a parts matched well planned out build,each time you get behind the wheel you have the pride of what you learned about it and working to build it is as much of the fun as driving it.You know that in no way have you short changed the very fabric that has been apart of hot rodding by a cam and it doesn't need to be expensive to be relativity done right.
Your in the right forum to get there here.Many of the members here are well equipped to get your build done right.
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
stock, low compression sbc with a thumper cam is about all i would spend on it. no roller cams or whatever else, thats just a waste of money for your goals.
it will be a slow turd, though.
it will be a slow turd, though.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
A decent cam L31 head 350 should run 12's. A 383 with more torque should easily get there. Thumpr cams should get you there. I wouldn't worry about other ppl's opinions on your car. Go to any car show and see hundreds of old muscle that sound like race cars but be hard pressed to get out of the 13's. I'd say 50-75% of cars at shows don't run as good as they sound. My daily driven ls1 with just bolt ons, idles like stock since stock cam but has catback exhaust, will outrun a lot of those cars. It's been 12.1's lol and not much is done to it!
If this was goin to be a carbed car then I'd order a lunati or comp cams equivalent of a 268-276 advertised duration cam on a tight 107-108 Lsa. It will give you a good lopey idle and perform great at same time. Flat tappet to keep it budgetary
If this was goin to be a carbed car then I'd order a lunati or comp cams equivalent of a 268-276 advertised duration cam on a tight 107-108 Lsa. It will give you a good lopey idle and perform great at same time. Flat tappet to keep it budgetary
Last edited by Orr89RocZ; Jun 3, 2012 at 12:23 PM.
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
A decent cam L31 head 350 should run 12's. A 383 with more torque should easily get there. Thumpr cams should get you there. I wouldn't worry about other ppl's opinions on your car. Go to any car show and see hundreds of old muscle that sound like race cars but be hard pressed to get out of the 13's. I'd say 50-75% of cars at shows don't run as good as they sound. My daily driven ls1 with just bolt ons, idles like stock since stock cam but has catback exhaust, will outrun a lot of those cars. It's been 12.1's lol and not much is done to it!
If this was goin to be a carbed car then I'd order a lunati or comp cams equivalent of a 268-276 advertised duration cam on a tight 107-108 Lsa. It will give you a good lopey idle and perform great at same time. Flat tappet to keep it budgetary
If this was goin to be a carbed car then I'd order a lunati or comp cams equivalent of a 268-276 advertised duration cam on a tight 107-108 Lsa. It will give you a good lopey idle and perform great at same time. Flat tappet to keep it budgetary
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
lol Not sure I'm one to be held in highest regard but thanks. I understand where you are coming from. I'm not a huge fan of it either because I know I can still get a good idle sound with a regular cam, playing with exhaust, and working the tune all the while getting good power and torque
But if thats what they want then let them do what they want. Helpful suggestions are good along as it doesnt turn into an arguement trying to force an opinion/suggestion on someone else
Its like the 305 build threads...always ends up off topic
Although its a cam advertised for "sound", i think it actually will work quite well in power too. More than enough to be happy with for the OP goals.
But if thats what they want then let them do what they want. Helpful suggestions are good along as it doesnt turn into an arguement trying to force an opinion/suggestion on someone else
Its like the 305 build threads...always ends up off topicAlthough its a cam advertised for "sound", i think it actually will work quite well in power too. More than enough to be happy with for the OP goals.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I'll admit I'm a misfit. I get a certain amount of pleasure taking my "secretary's car" (with bad paint, stock rims with highway radials on the fronts and DOT slicks on the back, full exhaust, smooth quiet idle, no power adders) to the track and pulling up next to the cars with new paint, flames, pizza cutters on the fronts, big tall slicks on the rears, 6 point roll bar, stripped interior, racer seat, big tach with shift light, spoiler on the back, lopey idle, open headers, and outrunning them by a second and 10 MPH. Even better when the other car is a Vette.
But, that's just me...
The Thumpr cams are going after the "muscle car sound" market. Yes, they will make okay power in a larger engine like a 383, but won't have the power or driveability of even their XE series cams. Like gary said, that "old school" sound came from what was "performance" at that time. Today, it's a different ballgame.
But, it's your car, and it's your money. Do with them as you please.
But, that's just me...
The Thumpr cams are going after the "muscle car sound" market. Yes, they will make okay power in a larger engine like a 383, but won't have the power or driveability of even their XE series cams. Like gary said, that "old school" sound came from what was "performance" at that time. Today, it's a different ballgame.
But, it's your car, and it's your money. Do with them as you please.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Ok well answer me this... if I end up deciding that the motor isn't exactly what I want after it's all said and done, how hard would it be to swap cams out? I'd imagine there's not much more in it than removing the valve train, removing the cam, set TDC, and reverse the order.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
If you go flat tappet then cam and lifters need swapped, so intake off, pull old lifters and pushrods. Then rad and all accessories need removed to get at timing cover and possibly lower oil pan abit to get cover off. Abit of a pain IMO, but doable in a weekend. Once you set all the lash/preloads then gotta do a new break in for 20 min. Change oil and then retune.
Should do it once and be done
Should do it once and be done
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Well from everything I've read it sounds like roller cams are the way to go. I'm sure there will be some diehard oldschool guys that will say a flat tappet is better for all applications. My question is: is it worth the upgrade? It should just be a different cam and lifters, correct?
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Yeah retrofit cam and lifters with cam button on timing cover to keep cam from walking. Abit more money but better option. No worries on break in or need for special oil additives since today's stuff isn't suitable for flats. You can run similar duration and run more lift at same time which will make more torque and power most of the time.
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
The roller option is certainly the way to go.Much better cam profiles and the added bonus of a broader torque curve depending on which cam you choose.If your going to use EFI the lobe centers matter for easy of tuning.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
If you start with a factory roller type block, then it isn't an "upgrade".
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 8
From: Clinton Township, Michigan
Car: 91 GTA, 73 Z28
Engine: 355, 6.0L
Transmission: TH350, 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.73
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
are you going to go with a stroker kit, or piece parts together? they are completely different animals
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
I cherry picked parts for my stroker.I found some kits aren't that good and in fact some are just out and out junk.I was able to build for a SCR with 5.7 good guy rods and dished pistons to use pumped gas.Packaged stroker kits with a low price point should lead to look for the weak link in the package.In terms of that I will never own,use,or suggest anything Eagle and just leave it at that.Also there isn't any power output advantage in full floating pistons unless you plan on swapping pistons often.So a press fit piston would work fine for this application.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
I was planning on piecing it together. I've used kits before in other aspects and there's always something that could use tweaking.
More info: Since I have connections, I'm debating on running the car on higher octane stock car type race fuels (110, 112). Besides carb tuning what all would be different from running 93 pump gas? Would I need different hard parts?
More info: Since I have connections, I'm debating on running the car on higher octane stock car type race fuels (110, 112). Besides carb tuning what all would be different from running 93 pump gas? Would I need different hard parts?
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
I dont think you need special parts but you could build with high compression now if you want to run 110-112 oct.
But I dont see the need to do so when your just considering a mild vortec headed combo with thumpr cam to make it sound pretty racey but maintain driveability and not shooting for super high hp numbers.
Piece together a kit yourself ensures you get all the right parts for the job. Thats the way I do it.
But I dont see the need to do so when your just considering a mild vortec headed combo with thumpr cam to make it sound pretty racey but maintain driveability and not shooting for super high hp numbers.
Piece together a kit yourself ensures you get all the right parts for the job. Thats the way I do it.
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 8
From: Clinton Township, Michigan
Car: 91 GTA, 73 Z28
Engine: 355, 6.0L
Transmission: TH350, 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.73
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
use rods that are stell with alot of clearance in them, thats all i have to say. also why use a flat tappet when hydraulic is much better
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
I think the industry of high performance parts is geared to the high compression engines where to run pump gas you have to be more selective about the parts/ and build plan.Even with 93 pumped gas,I think a good target for scr's is 9.3 with cast heads.With aluminum heads 10.1.The thing with aluminum heads it is true you can raise the scr's but because of aluminum material lowering the scr it is in a weird way meaning less.Heat is power output and the aluminum dissipates heat better than cast iron lowering the scr,so what's the point??.It isn't a true 10.1 anyways.
Cam choice is dictated by compression ratio,so you not caring about having to use race gas makes the world more your pearl.You could given a good bottom end start looking at 64 cc heads with shopping for good forged dome pistons to end up having 12.1 scr's.The telling end result will be once you figured in a cam and the dcr.How much overlap can help or hurt the end result in the trade-offs for a planned power curve.For the idea for most hot rodders of a guy like yourself not minding the use of race gas,having a forged 12.1 scr on a stroker,would give those hot rodders a woody.LOL.Yepper-I owned fresh off the showroom floor a 1964 dual quad 427 Ford that was a 12.1 scr.It was a smile a mile drive.Buzz to 7 grand no problem with tons of bottom.
Cam choice is dictated by compression ratio,so you not caring about having to use race gas makes the world more your pearl.You could given a good bottom end start looking at 64 cc heads with shopping for good forged dome pistons to end up having 12.1 scr's.The telling end result will be once you figured in a cam and the dcr.How much overlap can help or hurt the end result in the trade-offs for a planned power curve.For the idea for most hot rodders of a guy like yourself not minding the use of race gas,having a forged 12.1 scr on a stroker,would give those hot rodders a woody.LOL.Yepper-I owned fresh off the showroom floor a 1964 dual quad 427 Ford that was a 12.1 scr.It was a smile a mile drive.Buzz to 7 grand no problem with tons of bottom.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Because of aluminums ability to dissipate heat you have to run more static compression to equal the power of an iron head of same port style/flow. Differences may not be all that huge depending on the motor but that's a general rule of thumb
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 504
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Use the vortec heads with a comp cams xe274 and then around 9.5-10:1 compression and you should be right around your goal for a street car with a good sound, and it also wont be a dog. Plenty of guys run this combo, and it makes good power.
I personally have vortec heads, 10:1 compression, and an 288hr cam, which is bigger than the xe274, and i have no problems with streetability, and i also ran 12.67 in 1/4 mile. The lope and idle sounds mean, and it's one of the things i'm most proud of on the car. I think with the right amount of power, comes the right amount of sound. That may be one reason why your 305 isnt getting you the sound you want.
Check out this website:
http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=56505
That gave me more information than anywhere on vortec heads, should help you out!
I personally have vortec heads, 10:1 compression, and an 288hr cam, which is bigger than the xe274, and i have no problems with streetability, and i also ran 12.67 in 1/4 mile. The lope and idle sounds mean, and it's one of the things i'm most proud of on the car. I think with the right amount of power, comes the right amount of sound. That may be one reason why your 305 isnt getting you the sound you want.
Check out this website:
http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=56505
That gave me more information than anywhere on vortec heads, should help you out!
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Use the vortec heads with a comp cams xe274 and then around 9.5-10:1 compression and you should be right around your goal for a street car with a good sound, and it also wont be a dog. Plenty of guys run this combo, and it makes good power.
I personally have vortec heads, 10:1 compression, and an 288hr cam, which is bigger than the xe274, and i have no problems with streetability, and i also ran 12.67 in 1/4 mile. The lope and idle sounds mean, and it's one of the things i'm most proud of on the car. I think with the right amount of power, comes the right amount of sound. That may be one reason why your 305 isnt getting you the sound you want.
Check out this website:
http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=56505
That gave me more information than anywhere on vortec heads, should help you out!
I personally have vortec heads, 10:1 compression, and an 288hr cam, which is bigger than the xe274, and i have no problems with streetability, and i also ran 12.67 in 1/4 mile. The lope and idle sounds mean, and it's one of the things i'm most proud of on the car. I think with the right amount of power, comes the right amount of sound. That may be one reason why your 305 isnt getting you the sound you want.
Check out this website:
http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=56505
That gave me more information than anywhere on vortec heads, should help you out!
Still is must leave to wonder while window shopping World or RHS what the car would be like those set of heads??.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 504
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Trust in what I am about to say.In no way shape or form I'm I trying to be a PITA.I read and understand the part about you being proud of the car and as well as you should be.I think the Vortex heads are a low dollar 170cc comprise.Thing is it does leave to wonder if you have a really good set of heads where you would be under the 12.67et.That 355 really wants to see a 180cc head or alittle better.Now I don't want to open a chapter in a debate about Vortec heads.They are what they are and those facts are clearly known.As long as you build a bottom end strong enough to handle whatever you through at it,a bulk of the money should be spent on the top haft where the power is made.And anytime you end up doing a do-over it costs double.
Still is must leave to wonder while window shopping World or RHS what the car would be like those set of heads??.
Still is must leave to wonder while window shopping World or RHS what the car would be like those set of heads??.

The excitement about vortec heads running as fast as they do, comes from the fact that you can do it cheap. The OP has vortec heads, and hasnt mentioned any other head, which is where my vortec head story came into play.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Gordon, GA
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 2
From: Orlando
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 357, Canfield heads, solid roller,
Transmission: Upgraded 03 Cobra T56
Axle/Gears: 9" 3.50 gears and Detroit Locker
Re: Fab guy building 383 Stroker. Help appreciated
I was planning on piecing it together. I've used kits before in other aspects and there's always something that could use tweaking.
More info: Since I have connections, I'm debating on running the car on higher octane stock car type race fuels (110, 112). Besides carb tuning what all would be different from running 93 pump gas? Would I need different hard parts?
More info: Since I have connections, I'm debating on running the car on higher octane stock car type race fuels (110, 112). Besides carb tuning what all would be different from running 93 pump gas? Would I need different hard parts?









