regular bend vs mandrel bend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,756
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: let me rephrase
Originally posted by red90bird
I realize that mandrel bent is better, how much of a perfromance loss is there if it isn't mandrel bent?
I realize that mandrel bent is better, how much of a perfromance loss is there if it isn't mandrel bent?
Only problem is finding someone with a mandrel bender. I have found this to be quite the dilemma. Yea, I still haven't found anyone to fab up a mandrel bent exhaust after a year and a half, that's relatively in close proximity. go me.
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: G-Wood, SC
Car: 2 1988 GTAs
Engine: 5.0 and 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 posi's in both
Flowmaster, Dynomax, and Mac all make mandrel bent cat backs for these cars. I just put a Flowmaster American Thunder system on my car. Never dynoed it but just by the seat of the pants feel, I can feel an increase in performance. The old system must have really corked the car up cause its got a ton of torque now.
Trending Topics
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 379
Likes: 4
From: New Mexico
Car: 87 Firebird,
Engine: lq4
Transmission: gto t56 (mn12)
headers
I run a set of SLP headers on my 350 motor. Extremely happy with the fit and the quality of the headers. Its a y pipe design is the only drawback. But the performance is there and i've never had any problems with the headers leaking or the bolts backing out. The installation kit isnt really worth the money but you have to buy it. I bought a few in bulk figuring i would need to repair it one day. Its been 3 years and no problems yet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







