Hooker Aerochamber vs. Dynomax Ultraflo
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: MA
Car: 1981 Chevy Malibu, 1987 Formula 350
Engine: 229 V6, L98 TPI 350
Transmission: TH350, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ???, 9 bolt 3.27 posi
Hooker Aerochamber vs. Dynomax Ultraflo
I'm curious to know the differences between these two mufflers......
differences as far as sound and performance go
my setup i guess would be long tubes, no cat, 2.5" to the back, single input/single exit
Which will be louder at idle/low RPM's?
...Higher RPM's?
which flows better?
Thanks,
-Chris
differences as far as sound and performance go
my setup i guess would be long tubes, no cat, 2.5" to the back, single input/single exit
Which will be louder at idle/low RPM's?
...Higher RPM's?
which flows better?
Thanks,
-Chris
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Either of the two will meet the objective that you want. Dynomax mufflers tend to be on the quiet side which some people desire. All aftermarket mufflers flow great but the aerochamber is on the higher side. There are flow charts out on the web somewhere so you can judge for yourself. However, any muffler you choose will be just fine.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
I assume you are talking 2.5" duals to the back. If not I would use a 3" minimum for a single exhaust. I know the Dynomax Ultraflow is a good muffler. Allen
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: MA
Car: 1981 Chevy Malibu, 1987 Formula 350
Engine: 229 V6, L98 TPI 350
Transmission: TH350, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ???, 9 bolt 3.27 posi
I've been told that 2.5" is what I should use, that 3" would hurt my low-end power....
I thought that there really wasnt such thing as TOO much flow, but its what i've been told...
my origional plan was 3", but i dunno
and it'll be single, not dual exhaust
I thought that there really wasnt such thing as TOO much flow, but its what i've been told...
my origional plan was 3", but i dunno
and it'll be single, not dual exhaust
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by speedingpenguin
I've been told that 2.5" is what I should use, that 3" would hurt my low-end power....
I thought that there really wasnt such thing as TOO much flow, but its what i've been told...
my origional plan was 3", but i dunno
and it'll be single, not dual exhaust
I've been told that 2.5" is what I should use, that 3" would hurt my low-end power....
I thought that there really wasnt such thing as TOO much flow, but its what i've been told...
my origional plan was 3", but i dunno
and it'll be single, not dual exhaust
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Someone is giving you bad advice. Go with the 3 inch system. See the chart below from Dynomax. Magnaflow has a similar chart. These are the people who make exhaust systems and have done a great deal of dyno testing. Allen Last edited by 1989GTATransAm; Apr 24, 2005 at 05:53 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
no green
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
Jan 9, 2016 09:22 PM
Chevykid810
Firebirds for Sale
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:57 PM






