History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Difference between the RS & Z-28 Model

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #1  
85black&gold's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Car: 1987 Trans AM GTA
Engine: Vin Code "8" V-8 350C.I.
Transmission: 700-r4
Difference between the RS & Z-28 Model

Hello everyone,

I am loving my 1992 RS I bought for 500 dollars! It was smokin real bad but I popped of the valve covers and took out all the gunk that was trapping the oil drain and it stopped smoking!!YAY!! Anyways....i was wondering whats the difference between the RS model and the Z-28 model. Any info would help...


Thanks,
Rodrigo
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 07:46 PM
  #2  
Stevo's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 1
From: Northern, VA
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
well the major difference are the engine options but really there are actually tons of things to distinguish an RS from a Z28

Engine options being the biggest...you could get a 5.0L TPI(base engine for Z28) or a 5.7L TPI with the Z28

On a RS the engine options were a 3.1L V6 or a 5.0L TBI V8

Also the RS you could get a 5 speed with either engine choices on a Z28 a 5 spd was only available on the 5.0L not the 5.7L

badging was different as well as the appearance...the 1991-1992 both RS and Z28 had same ground effects but the Z28 gets a hood with 2 blisters and a high rise rear spoiler...The RS had a flat hood and no high rise spoiler

Wheels were the same both 16"

You might want to do a search to find out more about the differences but i beilive i covered the main differences

Last edited by Stevo; Feb 23, 2004 at 07:48 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 09:02 PM
  #3  
89cmrodriver's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: chesapeake va
Car: 08 Sierra, 08 Silverado, 91 z28
Engine: 5.3, 4.3, 5.7
Transmission: autos
steves got it all except, the wheels on the RS were 15" wheels previously used on RS's and Z28s (82-87) But the 16" wheel was optional, and was the same as the Z28 16" wheel. The Z28 got the 16" wheel as a standard option.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 10:16 PM
  #4  
85black&gold's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Car: 1987 Trans AM GTA
Engine: Vin Code "8" V-8 350C.I.
Transmission: 700-r4
Im not a bif fan of TBI injection but I guess it was worth it for $500!! Right? Im almost done prepping it for paint. Me and my bro are thinking of painting it the blue that came in the first gen trans am! What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 09:30 AM
  #5  
GTATransAM's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L 350 V8 TPI
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
A nice dark blue color on a camaro looks great, go for it.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 10:35 AM
  #6  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
if its a later model one that looks the same as the Z28s, and you're planing on modding it, the only diff is insurance cost.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #7  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
What about suspension? The Z28 got a much better suspension too... heavier swaybars, wonderbar (?), better springs (?) too. Some people say the 91-92 Z28s got a wonderbar, some say not, so i dunno.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 05:05 PM
  #8  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
mine 91 Z28 dosen't have the wonder bar. One things I've noticed about the V-6 RS's and V-8 RS's is that all the V-6's got the 15 inch body colored wheels...where as the V-8 (305) RS's got the 16 inch wheels.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 03:31 AM
  #9  
PyRo9862's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
Car: 91RS
Engine: 305tbi
Transmission: 700R4
Didn't Z28's have differant rear-end gears?
Was posi even an option for the RS?
Was 1LE even an option for the RS?

$500 was a great deal, i'm still kicking myself for not picking up a 91 I found for $500, needed a front fender 6cyl auto hardtop though, no power options.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 04:40 AM
  #10  
Bandit400's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 1
Car: 1992 RS, F41
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
one major difference, like mentioned above, would be the engine since 5.0 TPI and 5.7 TPI were not avail on RS

the 5.0 TBI was the base Z28 engine (according to some sources) and the best avail RS engine.

RS could have F41 suspension (like Z28) but opt upgraded FE2 Z28 suspension wasn't avail on RS

RS could not get Rear disks

RS could be had with same style Z28 wheels
and unless the Z28 came with the 245 tires, they also could share the same tires -235/55 Goodyear Eagle GA

RS could not get "performance axle ratio"

RS could not get fog lights, spoiler, hood humps, bumper engine badge, or bow-tie grill

So, the RS 'could' share the wheels, suspension and engine as Z28s provided the Z28 wasn't equipped with any of the upgrade options which most Z28s were TPI.

*this of course excludes the B4C RSs*

Last edited by Bandit400; Feb 25, 2004 at 06:31 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 06:20 AM
  #11  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
someone must have ordered my Z28 without te rear disk brake option....because mine has drum brakes on the rear (5.7 TPI) and also....my rear gears are 3.23's (performance rear axle)....but...everyone's car is different and has it's own story...
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 06:32 AM
  #12  
Bandit400's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 1
Car: 1992 RS, F41
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Kinda stinks they ran out of rear disk brakes in '91. I'd be mad to have the mighty L98 and look out back only to find drum brakes.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:31 AM
  #13  
PyRo9862's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
Car: 91RS
Engine: 305tbi
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Bandit400

the 5.0 TBI was the base Z28 engine (according to some sources) and the best avail RS engine.

Never heard of that, atleast in 91.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:55 AM
  #14  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Originally posted by PyRo9862
Never heard of that, atleast in 91.
i've never herad of that either....I've NEVER seen any 91 or 92 Z28's that were carbed...I thought there were never any produced.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 08:01 AM
  #15  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by 84customZ28
i've never herad of that either....I've NEVER seen any 91 or 92 Z28's that were carbed...I thought there were never any produced.
in 87 they switched the base V8 to TBI and from then on, didnt make any more carbed Fbodys.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 09:06 AM
  #16  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Originally posted by MrDude_1
in 87 they switched the base V8 to TBI and from then on, didnt make any more carbed Fbodys.
that's what I thought too....
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:17 AM
  #17  
Bandit400's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 1
Car: 1992 RS, F41
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
never seen one, but based on some literature, just as the TBI 5.0 (EFI, not carbed) was the base Formula engine, it was also the base Z28 engine. Of course there is a lot of incorrect published info out there...
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 12:13 PM
  #18  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
The available engines changed through the years, for example the T/A was available with any v8 from 82-88, but either 89 or 90 that changed, you could only get a TPI T/A, the LO3 was not available. I think it was similar with the Z28, in the later years of gen 3.

John
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 12:16 PM
  #19  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Originally posted by MrDude_1
in 87 they switched the base V8 to TBI and from then on, didnt make any more carbed Fbodys.
1987 was the LAST year for the 4BBL LG4, 1988 was the first year for the TBI LO3 in our cars. The LO3 replaced the LG4 as the base V8

John
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 12:19 PM
  #20  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by okfoz
1987 was the LAST year for the 4BBL LG4, 1988 was the first year for the TBI LO3 in our cars. The LO3 replaced the LG4 as the base V8

John
IN 87... as in the year... not the model year... poor wording on my part. sorry for the confusion.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 12:20 PM
  #21  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Originally posted by Bandit400
Kinda stinks they ran out of rear disk brakes in '91. I'd be mad to have the mighty L98 and look out back only to find drum brakes.
Technically speaking a Drum brake setup will stop better than a disk brake setup with the same diameter brakes. The down side to Drum brakes is they fade when they get hot, so racing is not a great idea. Fortunately during the shortage they subsituted Aluminum drum brakes and from a driving standpoint no one would probably ever know the difference unless they did some serious autocross racing.

John
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #22  
Bandit400's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 1
Car: 1992 RS, F41
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
true. I liked the idea of factory four wheel discs and it just took me a long time to finally get one. I guess it's a mental thing but it just seems a real performance car doesn't come with drum brakes. but you are right, when used for street use drums are perfectly fine.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 01:41 PM
  #23  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
a real performance car doesn't come with drum brakes
maybe if your thinkin of just our cars...but I plenty of people with the old 60's muscle cars (with drum) that would smoke our asses...lol
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 01:44 PM
  #24  
Bandit400's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 1
Car: 1992 RS, F41
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
so, was the LO3 (5.0 TBI) not the base engine (at least on paper) for Formula and Z28 in '91/92 whether or not they actually were installed in any cars? I know I have literature that says they were but as I said before there are incorrect publications.

I NEVER said that you could get a carbed engine in '91/92.everyone knows they were long since dropped.


as far as brakes, yes I was talking about modern performance cars only.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 03:35 PM
  #25  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
The Formula yes, the LO3 was the base engine, not sure on the Z28, never seen a 90-92 Z with the LO3 tho, my guess would be no, but there are some unusual cars out there...

John
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GTAman
Transmissions and Drivetrain
16
Jul 3, 2024 07:29 PM
db057
TBI
14
Apr 28, 2019 07:45 AM
BAMiller
TPI
4
Sep 14, 2015 06:38 PM
Formula_88AE
Engine Swap
1
Sep 3, 2015 01:47 PM
greenyone
TPI
3
Sep 2, 2015 03:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.