Difference between the RS & Z-28 Model
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Car: 1987 Trans AM GTA
Engine: Vin Code "8" V-8 350C.I.
Transmission: 700-r4
Difference between the RS & Z-28 Model
Hello everyone,
I am loving my 1992 RS I bought for 500 dollars! It was smokin real bad but I popped of the valve covers and took out all the gunk that was trapping the oil drain and it stopped smoking!!YAY!! Anyways....i was wondering whats the difference between the RS model and the Z-28 model. Any info would help...
Thanks,
Rodrigo
I am loving my 1992 RS I bought for 500 dollars! It was smokin real bad but I popped of the valve covers and took out all the gunk that was trapping the oil drain and it stopped smoking!!YAY!! Anyways....i was wondering whats the difference between the RS model and the Z-28 model. Any info would help...
Thanks,
Rodrigo
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 1
From: Northern, VA
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
well the major difference are the engine options but really there are actually tons of things to distinguish an RS from a Z28
Engine options being the biggest...you could get a 5.0L TPI(base engine for Z28) or a 5.7L TPI with the Z28
On a RS the engine options were a 3.1L V6 or a 5.0L TBI V8
Also the RS you could get a 5 speed with either engine choices on a Z28 a 5 spd was only available on the 5.0L not the 5.7L
badging was different as well as the appearance...the 1991-1992 both RS and Z28 had same ground effects but the Z28 gets a hood with 2 blisters and a high rise rear spoiler...The RS had a flat hood and no high rise spoiler
Wheels were the same both 16"
You might want to do a search to find out more about the differences but i beilive i covered the main differences
Engine options being the biggest...you could get a 5.0L TPI(base engine for Z28) or a 5.7L TPI with the Z28
On a RS the engine options were a 3.1L V6 or a 5.0L TBI V8
Also the RS you could get a 5 speed with either engine choices on a Z28 a 5 spd was only available on the 5.0L not the 5.7L
badging was different as well as the appearance...the 1991-1992 both RS and Z28 had same ground effects but the Z28 gets a hood with 2 blisters and a high rise rear spoiler...The RS had a flat hood and no high rise spoiler
Wheels were the same both 16"
You might want to do a search to find out more about the differences but i beilive i covered the main differences
Last edited by Stevo; Feb 23, 2004 at 07:48 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: chesapeake va
Car: 08 Sierra, 08 Silverado, 91 z28
Engine: 5.3, 4.3, 5.7
Transmission: autos
steves got it all except, the wheels on the RS were 15" wheels previously used on RS's and Z28s (82-87) But the 16" wheel was optional, and was the same as the Z28 16" wheel. The Z28 got the 16" wheel as a standard option.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Car: 1987 Trans AM GTA
Engine: Vin Code "8" V-8 350C.I.
Transmission: 700-r4
Im not a bif fan of TBI injection but I guess it was worth it for $500!! Right? Im almost done prepping it for paint. Me and my bro are thinking of painting it the blue that came in the first gen trans am! What do you guys think?
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
if its a later model one that looks the same as the Z28s, and you're planing on modding it, the only diff is insurance cost.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
What about suspension? The Z28 got a much better suspension too... heavier swaybars, wonderbar (?), better springs (?) too. Some people say the 91-92 Z28s got a wonderbar, some say not, so i dunno.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
mine 91 Z28 dosen't have the wonder bar. One things I've noticed about the V-6 RS's and V-8 RS's is that all the V-6's got the 15 inch body colored wheels...where as the V-8 (305) RS's got the 16 inch wheels.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
Car: 91RS
Engine: 305tbi
Transmission: 700R4
Didn't Z28's have differant rear-end gears?
Was posi even an option for the RS?
Was 1LE even an option for the RS?
$500 was a great deal, i'm still kicking myself for not picking up a 91 I found for $500, needed a front fender 6cyl auto hardtop though, no power options.
Was posi even an option for the RS?
Was 1LE even an option for the RS?
$500 was a great deal, i'm still kicking myself for not picking up a 91 I found for $500, needed a front fender 6cyl auto hardtop though, no power options.
one major difference, like mentioned above, would be the engine since 5.0 TPI and 5.7 TPI were not avail on RS
the 5.0 TBI was the base Z28 engine (according to some sources) and the best avail RS engine.
RS could have F41 suspension (like Z28) but opt upgraded FE2 Z28 suspension wasn't avail on RS
RS could not get Rear disks
RS could be had with same style Z28 wheels
and unless the Z28 came with the 245 tires, they also could share the same tires -235/55 Goodyear Eagle GA
RS could not get "performance axle ratio"
RS could not get fog lights, spoiler, hood humps, bumper engine badge, or bow-tie grill
So, the RS 'could' share the wheels, suspension and engine as Z28s provided the Z28 wasn't equipped with any of the upgrade options which most Z28s were TPI.
*this of course excludes the B4C RSs*
the 5.0 TBI was the base Z28 engine (according to some sources) and the best avail RS engine.
RS could have F41 suspension (like Z28) but opt upgraded FE2 Z28 suspension wasn't avail on RS
RS could not get Rear disks
RS could be had with same style Z28 wheels
and unless the Z28 came with the 245 tires, they also could share the same tires -235/55 Goodyear Eagle GA
RS could not get "performance axle ratio"
RS could not get fog lights, spoiler, hood humps, bumper engine badge, or bow-tie grill
So, the RS 'could' share the wheels, suspension and engine as Z28s provided the Z28 wasn't equipped with any of the upgrade options which most Z28s were TPI.
*this of course excludes the B4C RSs*
Last edited by Bandit400; Feb 25, 2004 at 06:31 AM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
someone must have ordered my Z28 without te rear disk brake option....because mine has drum brakes on the rear (5.7 TPI) and also....my rear gears are 3.23's (performance rear axle)....but...everyone's car is different and has it's own story...
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
Car: 91RS
Engine: 305tbi
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Bandit400
the 5.0 TBI was the base Z28 engine (according to some sources) and the best avail RS engine.
the 5.0 TBI was the base Z28 engine (according to some sources) and the best avail RS engine.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Originally posted by PyRo9862
Never heard of that, atleast in 91.
Never heard of that, atleast in 91.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by 84customZ28
i've never herad of that either....I've NEVER seen any 91 or 92 Z28's that were carbed...I thought there were never any produced.
i've never herad of that either....I've NEVER seen any 91 or 92 Z28's that were carbed...I thought there were never any produced.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Originally posted by MrDude_1
in 87 they switched the base V8 to TBI and from then on, didnt make any more carbed Fbodys.
in 87 they switched the base V8 to TBI and from then on, didnt make any more carbed Fbodys.
never seen one, but based on some literature, just as the TBI 5.0 (EFI, not carbed) was the base Formula engine, it was also the base Z28 engine. Of course there is a lot of incorrect published info out there...
Moderator




Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
The available engines changed through the years, for example the T/A was available with any v8 from 82-88, but either 89 or 90 that changed, you could only get a TPI T/A, the LO3 was not available. I think it was similar with the Z28, in the later years of gen 3.
John
John
Moderator




Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Originally posted by MrDude_1
in 87 they switched the base V8 to TBI and from then on, didnt make any more carbed Fbodys.
in 87 they switched the base V8 to TBI and from then on, didnt make any more carbed Fbodys.
John
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by okfoz
1987 was the LAST year for the 4BBL LG4, 1988 was the first year for the TBI LO3 in our cars. The LO3 replaced the LG4 as the base V8
John
1987 was the LAST year for the 4BBL LG4, 1988 was the first year for the TBI LO3 in our cars. The LO3 replaced the LG4 as the base V8
John
Moderator




Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Originally posted by Bandit400
Kinda stinks they ran out of rear disk brakes in '91. I'd be mad to have the mighty L98 and look out back only to find drum brakes.
Kinda stinks they ran out of rear disk brakes in '91. I'd be mad to have the mighty L98 and look out back only to find drum brakes.
John
true. I liked the idea of factory four wheel discs and it just took me a long time to finally get one. I guess it's a mental thing but it just seems a real performance car doesn't come with drum brakes. but you are right, when used for street use drums are perfectly fine.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
a real performance car doesn't come with drum brakes
so, was the LO3 (5.0 TBI) not the base engine (at least on paper) for Formula and Z28 in '91/92 whether or not they actually were installed in any cars? I know I have literature that says they were but as I said before there are incorrect publications.
I NEVER said that you could get a carbed engine in '91/92.everyone knows they were long since dropped.
as far as brakes, yes I was talking about modern performance cars only.
I NEVER said that you could get a carbed engine in '91/92.everyone knows they were long since dropped.
as far as brakes, yes I was talking about modern performance cars only.
Moderator




Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
The Formula yes, the LO3 was the base engine, not sure on the Z28, never seen a 90-92 Z with the LO3 tho, my guess would be no, but there are some unusual cars out there...
John
John
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





