Any Difference Between 84 and 85 Z28
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Vermillion, South Dakota
Car: 2002 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1 350 V8
Transmission: Automatic 4 Speed
Any Difference Between 84 and 85 Z28
Ok this is starting to bother me... I have been looking at pictures of 84 and 85 Z28s, and they seem to look a little bit different in body style, espically at the back end... but I cant decide if its just the cars im looking at. Do any of you know if their is a difference in body style... I appologize for the inconveince but its just one of those things you cant get out of your head.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
From: tucson
Car: Camaro
Engine: 355c.i.
Transmission: th350
Re: Any Difference Between 84 and 85 Z28
Originally posted by Outlaw87
Ok this is starting to bother me... I have been looking at pictures of 84 and 85 Z28s, and they seem to look a little bit different in body style, espically at the back end... but I cant decide if its just the cars im looking at. Do any of you know if their is a difference in body style... I appologize for the inconveince but its just one of those things you cant get out of your head.
Ok this is starting to bother me... I have been looking at pictures of 84 and 85 Z28s, and they seem to look a little bit different in body style, espically at the back end... but I cant decide if its just the cars im looking at. Do any of you know if their is a difference in body style... I appologize for the inconveince but its just one of those things you cant get out of your head.
they changed the GFX in 85 to a different style among other things. there was a thread not to long ago that had pics of all the different years and differences etc.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Vermillion, South Dakota
Car: 2002 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1 350 V8
Transmission: Automatic 4 Speed
Yeah im begining to see some differences, and I do agree that most 85 looks better... but this 84 looks awesome...
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
From: Where the heck am I !..Oh yeah,in Lousy-ana.
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 4L60 automatic
There are big differences between the 2 as already mentioned: ground efx,the nose was changed and the interior somewhat.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
From: Where the heck am I !..Oh yeah,in Lousy-ana.
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 4L60 automatic
Originally posted by Outlaw87
Yeah im begining to see some differences, and I do agree that most 85 looks better... but this 84 looks awesome...
Yeah im begining to see some differences, and I do agree that most 85 looks better... but this 84 looks awesome...
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Originally posted by Outlaw87
Yeah im begining to see some differences, and I do agree that most 85 looks better... but this 84 looks awesome...
Yeah im begining to see some differences, and I do agree that most 85 looks better... but this 84 looks awesome...
I do like the 82-84 Z's, if the color, wheel combo, and ride height is working together.
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 368
From: Las Vegas
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
And you noticed a difference in the rear because the taillights are different. The '85 had two horizontal grids(at least, the IROCs and Zs did--not sure about the other models) instead of one like the '82-'84.
I'm not sure I see what you mean Dante. That body and gfx looks perfectly normal for an '82-'84, except for the blacked-out taillights and no stripes.
I'm not sure I see what you mean Dante. That body and gfx looks perfectly normal for an '82-'84, except for the blacked-out taillights and no stripes.
Last edited by LAFireboyd; May 12, 2004 at 07:07 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Originally posted by LAFireboyd
I'm not sure I see what you mean Dante. That body and gfx looks perfectly normal for an '82-'84, except for the blacked-out taillights and no stripes.
I'm not sure I see what you mean Dante. That body and gfx looks perfectly normal for an '82-'84, except for the blacked-out taillights and no stripes.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
One other way to tell is by the curve (or lack of) on the rear bumper. If you look at the side profiles, an 82-84 has a slight curve/roll look where the back bumper almost curves under the car. The 85-90 rear bumper is more defined and almost forms a corner.
Here's an example:

Here's an example:
Last edited by Dante93GTZ; May 12, 2004 at 09:44 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
From: Where the heck am I !..Oh yeah,in Lousy-ana.
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 4L60 automatic
Originally posted by cdartz
That just might be the best 84 Z I've ever seen a picture of, and those wheels are awesome. Normally I prefer stock rims to aftermarket, but those look killer on that car. Anyone know who makes them?
That just might be the best 84 Z I've ever seen a picture of, and those wheels are awesome. Normally I prefer stock rims to aftermarket, but those look killer on that car. Anyone know who makes them?
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
From: Where the heck am I !..Oh yeah,in Lousy-ana.
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 4L60 automatic
Originally posted by scottmoyer
I noticed it also.
The 85-90 GFX were wider than the 82-84. It looks good on this car, but it is not the correct rear bumper cover
I noticed it also.
The 85-90 GFX were wider than the 82-84. It looks good on this car, but it is not the correct rear bumper cover
Last edited by 91Zman; May 14, 2004 at 10:05 AM.
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Westminster, Ma Blairsville PA (Wyotech)
Car: 88 IROC - 86 Trans Am
Engine: L98 Carbed - 350 Carbed and boosted
Transmission: auto - T5
Also the hood. The pre 85 Z had indentations in the middle (the crossfires had the flaps that open). The 85-90 Z hood had the louvers, and 91-92 had the same hood as 85-90 but had the blisters bolted in instead of the louvers
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
'85 is also when they changed the taillights to what I call the checkerboard lights or tic-tac-toe lights with the lines running from top to bottom and left to right.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
The main difference on the front fascia is that on the '85 cars the park/turn signal lamps aren't near as recessed. The '84 front has much harder angular lines. In '85 it was "softened" up. On the rear fascia there is a recessed area where the "Z28" nameplate goes. I've seen too many '82-'84 Z28's where the Z28 nameplate gets put back on the rear fascia and it's misplaced. Usually all the way over to the right!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Jan 28, 2016 09:58 PM
1982, 1984, 84, 85, camaro, difference, differences, firebird, headlights, iroc, speed, tac, taillights, tic, z28






