quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 5
From: Manati, PR
Car: Trans Am "GTA"
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
There is a guy here in Puerto Rico selling a yellow 92 Firebird, wich he says is a Firehawk. I havnt gone to see it in person since he lives about an hour from me, but there is some stuff that dont seem right to me. He says that it has a 305 automatic & t-tops. Would SLP build such a car? I dont want to drive an hour to waste my time.
here is the picture & it looks like it has TA from the front right?
here is the picture & it looks like it has TA from the front right?
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 417
Likes: 26
From: Lady Lake, FL
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: LR4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23posi/disc
Re: quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
There is a guy here in Puerto Rico selling a yellow 92 Firebird, wich he says is a Firehawk. I havnt gone to see it in person since he lives about an hour from me, but there is some stuff that dont seem right to me. He says that it has a 305 automatic & t-tops. Would SLP build such a car? I dont want to drive an hour to waste my time.
here is the picture & it looks like it has TA from the front right?
here is the picture & it looks like it has TA from the front right?
He's fulla ****!

as I would put it lol.
From my knowledge the SLP Firehawk had a 350, along with the Formula hood
and correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't all the firehawks red?
If any of the Vets around here want to correct any rookie mistake I may have pointed out, feel free.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 5
From: Manati, PR
Car: Trans Am "GTA"
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
Re: quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
I think Ive seen diffrent colos on the Firehawks. But the rest of the stuff you mentioned was the same things that I tought, & I dont think that a Firehawk woud had t-tops.
Supreme Member

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
From: Osceola Indiana
Car: 92 RS(sold) 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ones that turn
Re: quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
well thats not a firehawk all firehawks were formulas to begin with which meant no ground effects, and power bulge hood. there were a white, and a green one built. So no that is not a firehawk........... however that could be a slp trans am they built a few in 92, and they had a bunch of slp goodies in them
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 5
From: Manati, PR
Car: Trans Am "GTA"
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
Re: quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
But those wouldt be rare wold they? I mean no RPO codes for those. just a sticker on the engine compartment.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
That's not even a Trans Am. The hood is a base model hood and if you look at the rear spoiler (you have to really look to see it), it is the pedestal mount base model spoiler.
That is just a base 305 TBI Firebird.
That is just a base 305 TBI Firebird.
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: 305 carb'd V8
Transmission: 4-speed auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
Not to mention I don't see how according to your location, you could "drive" from Miami to Puerto Rico in an hour!
Just busting your ***** man =)
----------

Just busting your ***** man =)
----------
Last edited by Guro 305; Jun 15, 2008 at 12:39 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Trending Topics
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 5
From: Byhalia MS, just south of memphis
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 6.0 LS
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.70
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 27
From: Austin TX
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 383 SBC/HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
I don't think the guys knows much about his own car, so how can you trust any other info from him?? Maybe in his mind he really believes it's a Firehawk....
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 960
Likes: 1
From: Fletcher, NC, USA
Car: 1982 Recaro T/A
Engine: LU5 CFI 305 V8
Transmission: TH-200C
Axle/Gears: 3.23 F-body Fanatic: Yes
Re: quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
First of all there were no yellow Firehawks built, so right off the bat, the owner of that yellow car is either lying or misinformed. The Firehawks built were painted as follows:
Mandatory Red 81U: 21 cars
Medium Quasar Blue Metallic 80U: 1 car (#022)
Medium Green Metallic 45U: 1 car (#024)
Arctic White 10U: 1 car (#025)
Dark Jade Gray Metallic 18U: 1 car (#026)
Second, he would have to have RPO "B4U" to back up the claim that it's a Firehawk. He doesn't have it. OK, some of the Firehawks did not have B4U because they weren't red, or for whatever reason, but you could get the car's VIN and check it with SLP and find out that it's not a Firehawk, but I think it would be a waste of time.
That info is straight from Alex's site at http://www.transamgta.com/Firehawk/ and I highly recommend everyone reads it for accurate Firehawk information.
GT
Mandatory Red 81U: 21 cars
Medium Quasar Blue Metallic 80U: 1 car (#022)
Medium Green Metallic 45U: 1 car (#024)
Arctic White 10U: 1 car (#025)
Dark Jade Gray Metallic 18U: 1 car (#026)
Second, he would have to have RPO "B4U" to back up the claim that it's a Firehawk. He doesn't have it. OK, some of the Firehawks did not have B4U because they weren't red, or for whatever reason, but you could get the car's VIN and check it with SLP and find out that it's not a Firehawk, but I think it would be a waste of time.
That info is straight from Alex's site at http://www.transamgta.com/Firehawk/ and I highly recommend everyone reads it for accurate Firehawk information.
GT
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 960
Likes: 1
From: Fletcher, NC, USA
Car: 1982 Recaro T/A
Engine: LU5 CFI 305 V8
Transmission: TH-200C
Axle/Gears: 3.23 F-body Fanatic: Yes
Re: quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
by the way, Firehawk #027, the one and only Firehawk which was built from a Trans Am (as opposed to a Formula) did in fact have ground effects. None of the rest of them did. You can see it on Alex's site in the link.
GT
GT
Moderator




Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,298
Likes: 197
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: quiestions about a suposed 92 Firehawk
1) ITS NOT a firehawk
2) Its a Base Firebird
3) No Firehawk came in Yellow (although it would have been cool)
4) Its NOT a Trans Am
JOhn
2) Its a Base Firebird
3) No Firehawk came in Yellow (although it would have been cool)
4) Its NOT a Trans Am
JOhn
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RoadRocket L98
Auto Detailing and Appearance
5
Feb 18, 2001 05:53 PM






