Are Third Generations worth that much??
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Thanks dude and yep, lowered on Sportlines, sharp eye. I think the Sportlines are perfect for the car in terms of ride height and stance.
No sadly those are my only two pics
I'll get some new ones next fall when I'm back home, reunited with it.
No sadly those are my only two pics

I'll get some new ones next fall when I'm back home, reunited with it.
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Houston Area
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 355, 6.0 (LQ4) soon
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 2.77 for now
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I think it's not how much you put into your car, but how much you've gotten out of it. The compliments you get from a new paint job or the looks you get when people hear a nice exhaust note are what make it worth it for me. If you fix it up to sell it your never going to get your money back, but if you fix it up to keep and enjoy it, you will always benefit from what you have done. The guy who bought my sisters '79 offerd $3,000 for my car, I thought about what I could get for that kind of cash and decided no. I figure the only way I can get my money back would be trading for a car that I like alot. That way I will get something in return and not feel so bad about loosing it. IMO theres cash price and theres trading price.
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood, FL
Car: '88 Black GTA, T-tops, digital dash
Engine: 5.7 TPI w/custom chip
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 327 posi
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I think it's not how much you put into your car, but how much you've gotten out of it. The compliments you get from a new paint job or the looks you get when people hear a nice exhaust note are what make it worth it for me. If you fix it up to sell it your never going to get your money back, but if you fix it up to keep and enjoy it, you will always benefit from what you have done. The guy who bought my sisters '79 offerd $3,000 for my car, I thought about what I could get for that kind of cash and decided no. I figure the only way I can get my money back would be trading for a car that I like alot. That way I will get something in return and not feel so bad about loosing it. IMO theres cash price and theres trading price.
I totally agree!!! Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Shreve Ohio
Car: 1987 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 bored 40 over carbed
Transmission: 700r4 with B&M hard shift kit
Axle/Gears: posi
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
as stated before. they are worth what you think they are worth. kbb and places that put value on cars have no idea of the personal value of owning such an ionic american car.
people ask me all the time why am i restoring an 87 z28cause its not that old. i do it because its fun and i love the car i wanna make it better and beautiful again. sometime people will see the value in our third gens
people ask me all the time why am i restoring an 87 z28cause its not that old. i do it because its fun and i love the car i wanna make it better and beautiful again. sometime people will see the value in our third gens
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota FL
Car: 99 WS6 / 00 SS / 11 CTS-V / 13 300
Engine: LS1 / LS1 / LSA / 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 4L60E / T-56 / 6L80E / W5A80
Axle/Gears: 3.23 / 3.42 Auburn / 3.23 / 2.62
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I notice this too, it's either beat 91-92 RSs or base birds, all beat badly.
I get an unbelievable amount of looks/compliments in my RS, and IMO it could use a nice respray. I too hope people latch on to every thirdgen they can and restore them. IMO for Camaros '90 is the best year, and I happened to get mine by chance, it just happened to be the right car.
It's a bit sad people put such a premium on the IROC over the RS though; I certainly understand it, and when I buy a house next year I may add a 15k mile original red IROC to the stable, but compared to how manufacturer's usually do things, the differences between an RS and an IROC are very few (for 305 IROCs anyway).
If you think about it, usually when you buy a lower trim car you get different bumpers/valances/paint schemes (for example maybe the valances would be gray plastic as opposed to body color on the higher trim), but with these cars that wasn't the case; all body panels and valances are exactly identical sans the hood louvers (personally I've always thought they were a tad tacky but I'm biased), and tails and grille, the latter two which can be swapped out instantly by anyone in under an hour. You don't get the paint scheme, but it's no different than a DX3 IROC, and if anything the RS is cleaner without all the '80s decals. So effectively an RS is aesthetically the same as an IROC since it has all the same body panels and bumpers etc. Look inside, same deal. Interiors are identical sans the badge on the dash and a fog light switch. Under the hood, it's mainly just TPI but that's not that big of a deal.
So I don't know, to me the cars are very similar, and both can look awesome without having to hardly do anything. Since the cars are so similar, I'm not sure why more people don't go into the RS world. Sure it takes a lot to make a Berlinetta look/perform like an IROC, but with an RS, not so much. At the end of the day the RS is cleaner IMO, and I'm surprised more people aren't interested in them for it.
I get an unbelievable amount of looks/compliments in my RS, and IMO it could use a nice respray. I too hope people latch on to every thirdgen they can and restore them. IMO for Camaros '90 is the best year, and I happened to get mine by chance, it just happened to be the right car.
It's a bit sad people put such a premium on the IROC over the RS though; I certainly understand it, and when I buy a house next year I may add a 15k mile original red IROC to the stable, but compared to how manufacturer's usually do things, the differences between an RS and an IROC are very few (for 305 IROCs anyway).
If you think about it, usually when you buy a lower trim car you get different bumpers/valances/paint schemes (for example maybe the valances would be gray plastic as opposed to body color on the higher trim), but with these cars that wasn't the case; all body panels and valances are exactly identical sans the hood louvers (personally I've always thought they were a tad tacky but I'm biased), and tails and grille, the latter two which can be swapped out instantly by anyone in under an hour. You don't get the paint scheme, but it's no different than a DX3 IROC, and if anything the RS is cleaner without all the '80s decals. So effectively an RS is aesthetically the same as an IROC since it has all the same body panels and bumpers etc. Look inside, same deal. Interiors are identical sans the badge on the dash and a fog light switch. Under the hood, it's mainly just TPI but that's not that big of a deal.
So I don't know, to me the cars are very similar, and both can look awesome without having to hardly do anything. Since the cars are so similar, I'm not sure why more people don't go into the RS world. Sure it takes a lot to make a Berlinetta look/perform like an IROC, but with an RS, not so much. At the end of the day the RS is cleaner IMO, and I'm surprised more people aren't interested in them for it.
2) With that said, I too appreciate RSs for the same reasons you do. My '91 is a cleaner looking car than my IROC is, without the stripes/louvers. I've always appreciated the RSs for being a simpler car that didn't have gimmicks adding fake style to what in retrospect is truly a beautiful design.
3) When I'm getting gas for the RS at the local gas station, I often get "nice IROC" yelled at me from another car...so apparently the general public doesn't see the difference anyway

At the end of the day, indeed, an RS is probably 80% of the IROC experience. But, that 20% is significant...at least to me. When I stomp down on the gas of the IROC, and that old L98 digs in on fresh G Force BFGs and rockets off the line (with the fresh, sticky rubber, it barely spins at all if I nail it from idle off the line), the grin is from ear-to-ear. An LO3 just can't do that. Plus, the razor-sharp handling edge of the IROC is real, as well.
Don't get me wrong....I love my RS. But, its kind of like comparing a Challenger R/T to an SRT-8 today (I use this analogy because I know both cars very well). The Challenger R/T is really all the performance a normal enthusiast needs...but the SRT-8 has that edge that just makes it more fun to drive.
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I agree, it's funny you talk about people complimenting your RS as an IROC--I get the same thing from time to time, so as you said the general public seems to be clueless anyway.
When I was shopping for my car in '99 as a 15 year old kid, sure I wanted an IROC, but this just happened to be the car that popped up that was the best car for the money in the best shape (I wouldn't have bought a V6 though). The IROCs at the time here in the rust belt were still too expensive for a 15 year old's budget (my budget was $4k, I got this for $4300, I think I did alright), but this one just happened to fall into my lap so I bought it; funny thing is if I could go back in time, now that I've had it 12 years, I would do the exact same thing and I wouldn't trade the car for anything. The extra bonus is that the Bright Blue Metallic (Maui Blue) was never available on an IROC so I couldn't even get an IROC in this color if I had wanted to, and I love the color bigtime. It seems most Maui Blue cars got shafted with the V6, but I guess I got lucky since it's an L03 (if you can call that lucky), and has the black custom cloth interior and all power options (sans seat of course), so it's a relatively loaded RS.
All those things aside though, I too want an ultra low mileage L98 IROC just because. Hopefully in the next couple years I can add one. That said I've never driven one, nor ridden in one sadly (or any IROC), so for me ignorance may very well be bliss. I think the one problem with picking up another Camaro is that then I will always be comparing the two and inevitably end up liking one more than the other.
It's also funny you mention the Challenger--I'd get a new Classic R/T 100 times out of 100 over an SRT-8; in my mind the R/T should be the top model as it always was. Not to mention the Classic R/T just looks so much better with the side stripes, script emblems, and oldskool wheels. Sad thing is though, when I was back home in the States this past summer for a month, I went to the dealer to look at them after hours, the build quality was terrible--crooked fender emblems, mismatched bumper paint...it's almost like they were coming out of Norwood/Van Nuys lol.
When I was shopping for my car in '99 as a 15 year old kid, sure I wanted an IROC, but this just happened to be the car that popped up that was the best car for the money in the best shape (I wouldn't have bought a V6 though). The IROCs at the time here in the rust belt were still too expensive for a 15 year old's budget (my budget was $4k, I got this for $4300, I think I did alright), but this one just happened to fall into my lap so I bought it; funny thing is if I could go back in time, now that I've had it 12 years, I would do the exact same thing and I wouldn't trade the car for anything. The extra bonus is that the Bright Blue Metallic (Maui Blue) was never available on an IROC so I couldn't even get an IROC in this color if I had wanted to, and I love the color bigtime. It seems most Maui Blue cars got shafted with the V6, but I guess I got lucky since it's an L03 (if you can call that lucky), and has the black custom cloth interior and all power options (sans seat of course), so it's a relatively loaded RS.
All those things aside though, I too want an ultra low mileage L98 IROC just because. Hopefully in the next couple years I can add one. That said I've never driven one, nor ridden in one sadly (or any IROC), so for me ignorance may very well be bliss. I think the one problem with picking up another Camaro is that then I will always be comparing the two and inevitably end up liking one more than the other.
It's also funny you mention the Challenger--I'd get a new Classic R/T 100 times out of 100 over an SRT-8; in my mind the R/T should be the top model as it always was. Not to mention the Classic R/T just looks so much better with the side stripes, script emblems, and oldskool wheels. Sad thing is though, when I was back home in the States this past summer for a month, I went to the dealer to look at them after hours, the build quality was terrible--crooked fender emblems, mismatched bumper paint...it's almost like they were coming out of Norwood/Van Nuys lol.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
From: Brick, NJ
Car: 91 Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: Built T-5
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
i gotta say that unless its a perfect rare model, with rare options, or a rare color, i can't see myself paying much more that 5000 for a third gen.....now if its say a first year GTA, in a odd color, with every imaginable option, and low miles, like under 50,000....maybe worth 10k.....if its PERFECT!!!
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota FL
Car: 99 WS6 / 00 SS / 11 CTS-V / 13 300
Engine: LS1 / LS1 / LSA / 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 4L60E / T-56 / 6L80E / W5A80
Axle/Gears: 3.23 / 3.42 Auburn / 3.23 / 2.62
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I agree, it's funny you talk about people complimenting your RS as an IROC--I get the same thing from time to time, so as you said the general public seems to be clueless anyway.
When I was shopping for my car in '99 as a 15 year old kid, sure I wanted an IROC, but this just happened to be the car that popped up that was the best car for the money in the best shape (I wouldn't have bought a V6 though). The IROCs at the time here in the rust belt were still too expensive for a 15 year old's budget (my budget was $4k, I got this for $4300, I think I did alright), but this one just happened to fall into my lap so I bought it; funny thing is if I could go back in time, now that I've had it 12 years, I would do the exact same thing and I wouldn't trade the car for anything. The extra bonus is that the Bright Blue Metallic (Maui Blue) was never available on an IROC so I couldn't even get an IROC in this color if I had wanted to, and I love the color bigtime. It seems most Maui Blue cars got shafted with the V6, but I guess I got lucky since it's an L03 (if you can call that lucky), and has the black custom cloth interior and all power options (sans seat of course), so it's a relatively loaded RS.
All those things aside though, I too want an ultra low mileage L98 IROC just because. Hopefully in the next couple years I can add one. That said I've never driven one, nor ridden in one sadly (or any IROC), so for me ignorance may very well be bliss. I think the one problem with picking up another Camaro is that then I will always be comparing the two and inevitably end up liking one more than the other.
It's also funny you mention the Challenger--I'd get a new Classic R/T 100 times out of 100 over an SRT-8; in my mind the R/T should be the top model as it always was. Not to mention the Classic R/T just looks so much better with the side stripes, script emblems, and oldskool wheels. Sad thing is though, when I was back home in the States this past summer for a month, I went to the dealer to look at them after hours, the build quality was terrible--crooked fender emblems, mismatched bumper paint...it's almost like they were coming out of Norwood/Van Nuys lol.
When I was shopping for my car in '99 as a 15 year old kid, sure I wanted an IROC, but this just happened to be the car that popped up that was the best car for the money in the best shape (I wouldn't have bought a V6 though). The IROCs at the time here in the rust belt were still too expensive for a 15 year old's budget (my budget was $4k, I got this for $4300, I think I did alright), but this one just happened to fall into my lap so I bought it; funny thing is if I could go back in time, now that I've had it 12 years, I would do the exact same thing and I wouldn't trade the car for anything. The extra bonus is that the Bright Blue Metallic (Maui Blue) was never available on an IROC so I couldn't even get an IROC in this color if I had wanted to, and I love the color bigtime. It seems most Maui Blue cars got shafted with the V6, but I guess I got lucky since it's an L03 (if you can call that lucky), and has the black custom cloth interior and all power options (sans seat of course), so it's a relatively loaded RS.
All those things aside though, I too want an ultra low mileage L98 IROC just because. Hopefully in the next couple years I can add one. That said I've never driven one, nor ridden in one sadly (or any IROC), so for me ignorance may very well be bliss. I think the one problem with picking up another Camaro is that then I will always be comparing the two and inevitably end up liking one more than the other.
It's also funny you mention the Challenger--I'd get a new Classic R/T 100 times out of 100 over an SRT-8; in my mind the R/T should be the top model as it always was. Not to mention the Classic R/T just looks so much better with the side stripes, script emblems, and oldskool wheels. Sad thing is though, when I was back home in the States this past summer for a month, I went to the dealer to look at them after hours, the build quality was terrible--crooked fender emblems, mismatched bumper paint...it's almost like they were coming out of Norwood/Van Nuys lol.
My mom had bought it new, though...I got it in '98 with 56k on it. Sold it 4 years later with 98k to a girl that wrecked it 6 months later. It killed me to sell it...but I kept a few things from it when I sold it...namely the IROC tailights I had bought for it, and the K&N filters. I knew I'd own another third gen. Today, the LH tailight lives on with my RS (someone backed into it and took off here at work, smashing the lens BEFORE the repaint, thankfully), and the K&Ns were cleaned and installed in my IROC just this past May!2 ) Believe it or not, the first IROC I've ever driven was my own
I had purchased my 86 Trans Am just 3 months prior, and owned a TPI Formula years ago, so I was familiar with the feeling of a TPI engine. But, seeing a veritable twin to my original, old RS (Grey outside, grey custom cloth inside, t-tops) in IROC form was a sight I'll never forget. Now that I own it, it's the one car I know for sure I will never part with...and I've owned my Z28 for almost 10 years!3) As for Challengers, I too love the Classic package...I'm looking at a black one with white stripes in my own showroom as I type this. Great looking car...but the SRT is an experience all its own, in my mind. I've been lucky enough to drive the 2 back-to-back...an amazing experience.
But thats for another board
Nice RS btw...my Formula was Maui Blue, but my '89 RS had those same 15s. Looking at your signiature makes me want to take the 17" Torq Thrusts off my RS and go find some "z28" 5 spoke 15s and get some white lettered tires! Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 496
From: Pflugerville, Texas
Car: 92 Heritage Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Limited Slip
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
1) I think people tend to be less excited about RSs because when it comes to the collector car world, "best of the best" always reigns supreme. With the RS being the entry level, it doesn't get that billing.
2) With that said, I too appreciate RSs for the same reasons you do. My '91 is a cleaner looking car than my IROC is, without the stripes/louvers. I've always appreciated the RSs for being a simpler car that didn't have gimmicks adding fake style to what in retrospect is truly a beautiful design.
3) When I'm getting gas for the RS at the local gas station, I often get "nice IROC" yelled at me from another car...so apparently the general public doesn't see the difference anyway
At the end of the day, indeed, an RS is probably 80% of the IROC experience. But, that 20% is significant...at least to me. When I stomp down on the gas of the IROC, and that old L98 digs in on fresh G Force BFGs and rockets off the line (with the fresh, sticky rubber, it barely spins at all if I nail it from idle off the line), the grin is from ear-to-ear. An LO3 just can't do that. Plus, the razor-sharp handling edge of the IROC is real, as well.
Don't get me wrong....I love my RS. But, its kind of like comparing a Challenger R/T to an SRT-8 today (I use this analogy because I know both cars very well). The Challenger R/T is really all the performance a normal enthusiast needs...but the SRT-8 has that edge that just makes it more fun to drive.
2) With that said, I too appreciate RSs for the same reasons you do. My '91 is a cleaner looking car than my IROC is, without the stripes/louvers. I've always appreciated the RSs for being a simpler car that didn't have gimmicks adding fake style to what in retrospect is truly a beautiful design.
3) When I'm getting gas for the RS at the local gas station, I often get "nice IROC" yelled at me from another car...so apparently the general public doesn't see the difference anyway

At the end of the day, indeed, an RS is probably 80% of the IROC experience. But, that 20% is significant...at least to me. When I stomp down on the gas of the IROC, and that old L98 digs in on fresh G Force BFGs and rockets off the line (with the fresh, sticky rubber, it barely spins at all if I nail it from idle off the line), the grin is from ear-to-ear. An LO3 just can't do that. Plus, the razor-sharp handling edge of the IROC is real, as well.
Don't get me wrong....I love my RS. But, its kind of like comparing a Challenger R/T to an SRT-8 today (I use this analogy because I know both cars very well). The Challenger R/T is really all the performance a normal enthusiast needs...but the SRT-8 has that edge that just makes it more fun to drive.
I have test drove an auto R/T with the 3.08 gears and it was a slug. The stick R/T with the 3.94 gears is comparable to the auto SRT with the 3.08 gears. i even drove a 2008 SRT with Cold air intake and the stick 2009 challenger R/T with the 3.94 gears is very close to the auto SRT.
I have not driven the stick SRT but I believe that is the top dog but out of my price range.
I agree, it's funny you talk about people complimenting your RS as an IROC--I get the same thing from time to time, so as you said the general public seems to be clueless anyway.
When I was shopping for my car in '99 as a 15 year old kid, sure I wanted an IROC, but this just happened to be the car that popped up that was the best car for the money in the best shape (I wouldn't have bought a V6 though). The IROCs at the time here in the rust belt were still too expensive for a 15 year old's budget (my budget was $4k, I got this for $4300, I think I did alright), but this one just happened to fall into my lap so I bought it; funny thing is if I could go back in time, now that I've had it 12 years, I would do the exact same thing and I wouldn't trade the car for anything. The extra bonus is that the Bright Blue Metallic (Maui Blue) was never available on an IROC so I couldn't even get an IROC in this color if I had wanted to, and I love the color bigtime. It seems most Maui Blue cars got shafted with the V6, but I guess I got lucky since it's an L03 (if you can call that lucky), and has the black custom cloth interior and all power options (sans seat of course), so it's a relatively loaded RS.
All those things aside though, I too want an ultra low mileage L98 IROC just because. Hopefully in the next couple years I can add one. That said I've never driven one, nor ridden in one sadly (or any IROC), so for me ignorance may very well be bliss. I think the one problem with picking up another Camaro is that then I will always be comparing the two and inevitably end up liking one more than the other.
It's also funny you mention the Challenger--I'd get a new Classic R/T 100 times out of 100 over an SRT-8; in my mind the R/T should be the top model as it always was. Not to mention the Classic R/T just looks so much better with the side stripes, script emblems, and oldskool wheels. Sad thing is though, when I was back home in the States this past summer for a month, I went to the dealer to look at them after hours, the build quality was terrible--crooked fender emblems, mismatched bumper paint...it's almost like they were coming out of Norwood/Van Nuys lol.
When I was shopping for my car in '99 as a 15 year old kid, sure I wanted an IROC, but this just happened to be the car that popped up that was the best car for the money in the best shape (I wouldn't have bought a V6 though). The IROCs at the time here in the rust belt were still too expensive for a 15 year old's budget (my budget was $4k, I got this for $4300, I think I did alright), but this one just happened to fall into my lap so I bought it; funny thing is if I could go back in time, now that I've had it 12 years, I would do the exact same thing and I wouldn't trade the car for anything. The extra bonus is that the Bright Blue Metallic (Maui Blue) was never available on an IROC so I couldn't even get an IROC in this color if I had wanted to, and I love the color bigtime. It seems most Maui Blue cars got shafted with the V6, but I guess I got lucky since it's an L03 (if you can call that lucky), and has the black custom cloth interior and all power options (sans seat of course), so it's a relatively loaded RS.
All those things aside though, I too want an ultra low mileage L98 IROC just because. Hopefully in the next couple years I can add one. That said I've never driven one, nor ridden in one sadly (or any IROC), so for me ignorance may very well be bliss. I think the one problem with picking up another Camaro is that then I will always be comparing the two and inevitably end up liking one more than the other.
It's also funny you mention the Challenger--I'd get a new Classic R/T 100 times out of 100 over an SRT-8; in my mind the R/T should be the top model as it always was. Not to mention the Classic R/T just looks so much better with the side stripes, script emblems, and oldskool wheels. Sad thing is though, when I was back home in the States this past summer for a month, I went to the dealer to look at them after hours, the build quality was terrible--crooked fender emblems, mismatched bumper paint...it's almost like they were coming out of Norwood/Van Nuys lol.
for me, all i want is the stick R/T with the 20 inch rims since it comes with the 3.94 gears, the stock rims come with the 3.73 gears.
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
As for the Challenger, didn't you were a Mopar dealer. It's sad though how the Mustang/Camaro/Challenger are all $35k+ cars for any models you'd want. Priced out of the young guy market they were originally intended for, sadly.
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota FL
Car: 99 WS6 / 00 SS / 11 CTS-V / 13 300
Engine: LS1 / LS1 / LSA / 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 4L60E / T-56 / 6L80E / W5A80
Axle/Gears: 3.23 / 3.42 Auburn / 3.23 / 2.62
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
It's funny you say that about the rims...Those BFGs are circa '99 and will be the very first thing replaced when I get back home to my car in September. I know I want new rims, but I too keep looking at the pic and think, "Damn, those rims look really nice with those tires". I don't know if it's because they are plain silver and not body colored, if it's the tires on them, or what but usually when I see pics of those Z28 wheels they look cruddy. But then I look at the car from behind and the 215s are real pizza cutters. What to do, what to do. I love the white letter tires and would hate to lose those for 18s. Still don't understand why there isn't an 18x9 polished IROC replica, or why Oasis wheel quit making them. Either way I'm afraid new wheels will take away from the car rather than accent it as the wheels/tires on it now do. I'd get satin rims, but I just don't really want to spend cash on satin rims; if I'm going to get new wheels I'd prefer something polished. I'm scared billets are too flashy for the car. More searching to do I guess but right now the IROC replicas are winning. I've had twelve years to decide what I want, I should figure it out here soon. Maybe I'm just afraid of change after so long. lol.
As for the Challenger, didn't you were a Mopar dealer. It's sad though how the Mustang/Camaro/Challenger are all $35k+ cars for any models you'd want. Priced out of the young guy market they were originally intended for, sadly.
As for the Challenger, didn't you were a Mopar dealer. It's sad though how the Mustang/Camaro/Challenger are all $35k+ cars for any models you'd want. Priced out of the young guy market they were originally intended for, sadly.
I guess I'll stick with the Comp TAs for as long as I can.2) I debated on wheels for my RS for 6 months, and now wish I'd re-done the stock 16s instead of the TT2s. Don't get me wrong....I love TT2s. But, when I see my IROC on stock 16s...my TA on stock 15s...my Z28 on the stock white 16s...stock wheels just seem more "complete" to me somehow.
Maybe I'm getting more old school as I get older
I say keep your wheels! Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Hey Jason, I love Torque Thrusts, but your RS would look SO SWEET with refinished stock 16's. IMHO of course.
Member

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Likes: 2
From: ontario
Car: 87 player's trans am a4u (pepsi car
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I hunted for mine, overpaid for it, needs floors, complete body, paint, I'm into it with the race equipment, recreation pipes with dumps, (over the counter from G.M) for the racers back in the day, Etc... Still sourcing parts, 10 G's. But I always wanted it when I was a teenager and had to have it. Will it ever be worth anything (1 of 22 built as a factory race car) Who knows, and more importantly, who cares? If you get into the hobby for the purpose of making $$$$ You will probably loose your shirt. (Looking good for those morons who invested their 401k"s in a car!) Stop paying attention to those stupid auctions on the speed chanel and enjoy your car, because it was built to be driven. Personally I like 'em as they came from the factory.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I hunted for mine, overpaid for it, needs floors, complete body, paint, I'm into it with the race equipment, recreation pipes with dumps, (over the counter from G.M) for the racers back in the day, Etc... Still sourcing parts, 10 G's. But I always wanted it when I was a teenager and had to have it. Will it ever be worth anything (1 of 22 built as a factory race car) Who knows, and more importantly, who cares? If you get into the hobby for the purpose of making $$$$ You will probably loose your shirt. (Looking good for those morons who invested their 401k"s in a car!) Stop paying attention to those stupid auctions on the speed chanel and enjoy your car, because it was built to be driven. Personally I like 'em as they came from the factory.
Member

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Likes: 2
From: ontario
Car: 87 player's trans am a4u (pepsi car
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
New computer' pics are on the old one, have to load them up. go to "players challenge series.ca" then go to teams, then 1987 east, and scroll down to # 93, it was raced by Derek Johnson. that was what it looked like when it was new. I'll be posting as the resto continues.
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 28
From: Florida
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: LH6
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Auburn Posi
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
1) My first car was an '89 RS, and yes, I got shafted with the 2.8
My mom had bought it new, though...I got it in '98 with 56k on it. Sold it 4 years later with 98k to a girl that wrecked it 6 months later. It killed me to sell it...but I kept a few things from it when I sold it...namely the IROC tailights I had bought for it, and the K&N filters. I knew I'd own another third gen. Today, the LH tailight lives on with my RS (someone backed into it and took off here at work, smashing the lens BEFORE the repaint, thankfully), and the K&Ns were cleaned and installed in my IROC just this past May!
2 ) Believe it or not, the first IROC I've ever driven was my own
I had purchased my 86 Trans Am just 3 months prior, and owned a TPI Formula years ago, so I was familiar with the feeling of a TPI engine. But, seeing a veritable twin to my original, old RS (Grey outside, grey custom cloth inside, t-tops) in IROC form was a sight I'll never forget. Now that I own it, it's the one car I know for sure I will never part with...and I've owned my Z28 for almost 10 years!
3) As for Challengers, I too love the Classic package...I'm looking at a black one with white stripes in my own showroom as I type this. Great looking car...but the SRT is an experience all its own, in my mind. I've been lucky enough to drive the 2 back-to-back...an amazing experience.
But thats for another board
Nice RS btw...my Formula was Maui Blue, but my '89 RS had those same 15s. Looking at your signiature makes me want to take the 17" Torq Thrusts off my RS and go find some "z28" 5 spoke 15s and get some white lettered tires!
My mom had bought it new, though...I got it in '98 with 56k on it. Sold it 4 years later with 98k to a girl that wrecked it 6 months later. It killed me to sell it...but I kept a few things from it when I sold it...namely the IROC tailights I had bought for it, and the K&N filters. I knew I'd own another third gen. Today, the LH tailight lives on with my RS (someone backed into it and took off here at work, smashing the lens BEFORE the repaint, thankfully), and the K&Ns were cleaned and installed in my IROC just this past May!2 ) Believe it or not, the first IROC I've ever driven was my own
I had purchased my 86 Trans Am just 3 months prior, and owned a TPI Formula years ago, so I was familiar with the feeling of a TPI engine. But, seeing a veritable twin to my original, old RS (Grey outside, grey custom cloth inside, t-tops) in IROC form was a sight I'll never forget. Now that I own it, it's the one car I know for sure I will never part with...and I've owned my Z28 for almost 10 years!3) As for Challengers, I too love the Classic package...I'm looking at a black one with white stripes in my own showroom as I type this. Great looking car...but the SRT is an experience all its own, in my mind. I've been lucky enough to drive the 2 back-to-back...an amazing experience.
But thats for another board
Nice RS btw...my Formula was Maui Blue, but my '89 RS had those same 15s. Looking at your signiature makes me want to take the 17" Torq Thrusts off my RS and go find some "z28" 5 spoke 15s and get some white lettered tires!Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 28
From: Florida
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: LH6
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Auburn Posi
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
One other thing...I want to re-iterate that I hope more and more people latch onto what's left out there for third gens. It does amaze me how many I see that are STILL being driven by teenagers and being beaten to hell. I don't see them on the road often at all anymore. And when I do, they are normally beat '91-'92 RSs, or '80s base Firebird coupes. Yet, whenever I drive the RS, people admire it everywhere. I wish more people admired them enough to save them!
I notice this too, it's either beat 91-92 RSs or base birds, all beat badly.
I get an unbelievable amount of looks/compliments in my RS, and IMO it could use a nice respray. I too hope people latch on to every thirdgen they can and restore them. IMO for Camaros '90 is the best year, and I happened to get mine by chance, it just happened to be the right car.
It's a bit sad people put such a premium on the IROC over the RS though; I certainly understand it, and when I buy a house next year I may add a 15k mile original red IROC to the stable, but compared to how manufacturer's usually do things, the differences between an RS and an IROC are very few (for 305 IROCs anyway).
If you think about it, usually when you buy a lower trim car you get different bumpers/valances/paint schemes (for example maybe the valances would be gray plastic as opposed to body color on the higher trim), but with these cars that wasn't the case; all body panels and valances are exactly identical sans the hood louvers (personally I've always thought they were a tad tacky but I'm biased), and tails and grille, the latter two which can be swapped out instantly by anyone in under an hour. You don't get the paint scheme, but it's no different than a DX3 IROC, and if anything the RS is cleaner without all the '80s decals. So effectively an RS is aesthetically the same as an IROC since it has all the same body panels and bumpers etc. Look inside, same deal. Interiors are identical sans the badge on the dash and a fog light switch. Under the hood, it's mainly just TPI but that's not that big of a deal.
So I don't know, to me the cars are very similar, and both can look awesome without having to hardly do anything. Since the cars are so similar, I'm not sure why more people don't go into the RS world. Sure it takes a lot to make a Berlinetta look/perform like an IROC, but with an RS, not so much. At the end of the day the RS is cleaner IMO, and I'm surprised more people aren't interested in them for it.
I get an unbelievable amount of looks/compliments in my RS, and IMO it could use a nice respray. I too hope people latch on to every thirdgen they can and restore them. IMO for Camaros '90 is the best year, and I happened to get mine by chance, it just happened to be the right car.
It's a bit sad people put such a premium on the IROC over the RS though; I certainly understand it, and when I buy a house next year I may add a 15k mile original red IROC to the stable, but compared to how manufacturer's usually do things, the differences between an RS and an IROC are very few (for 305 IROCs anyway).
If you think about it, usually when you buy a lower trim car you get different bumpers/valances/paint schemes (for example maybe the valances would be gray plastic as opposed to body color on the higher trim), but with these cars that wasn't the case; all body panels and valances are exactly identical sans the hood louvers (personally I've always thought they were a tad tacky but I'm biased), and tails and grille, the latter two which can be swapped out instantly by anyone in under an hour. You don't get the paint scheme, but it's no different than a DX3 IROC, and if anything the RS is cleaner without all the '80s decals. So effectively an RS is aesthetically the same as an IROC since it has all the same body panels and bumpers etc. Look inside, same deal. Interiors are identical sans the badge on the dash and a fog light switch. Under the hood, it's mainly just TPI but that's not that big of a deal.
So I don't know, to me the cars are very similar, and both can look awesome without having to hardly do anything. Since the cars are so similar, I'm not sure why more people don't go into the RS world. Sure it takes a lot to make a Berlinetta look/perform like an IROC, but with an RS, not so much. At the end of the day the RS is cleaner IMO, and I'm surprised more people aren't interested in them for it.
I painted my Camaro in my backyard, my Dad got 600 dollars worth of materials for work for free. It has orange peel, and trash in it, but still looks good. We didn't put a clear coat on it, but I'm hoping some waxing will shine it up. I am a teenager, 18. I don't beat up my Camaro, I try to make it look the best it can, every little problem with it bugs me to no end. I am pretty sure I have the nicest third gen within 15 miles of me. All of the ones around here are beat up. I've only seen one IROC on the road ever. It's always beat up RS cars or base Firebirds. I completely agree with you guys, we bring the trailer trash look upon ourselves. I'd love to see us try and fix it.
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Houston Area
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 355, 6.0 (LQ4) soon
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 2.77 for now
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
We don't bring it on ourselves, its everyone else that uses them for everyday transportation. Not everyone that has a 3rd gen likes it, they would rather have something else but couldn't afford it or some just got a hand me down
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
hey now, let's not go bashing people who use them as daily transportation. I happen to enjoy driving mine as often as I can, take pride in how it looks, and enjoy the stares and appreciation it gets.
something cool...my wife and I pulled up to a Christmas party last week at a house probably valued at $500,000 (quite a house for Texas, I know in some parts of the country that amount doesn't get you much) Anyway, we puller up and the hostess saw my 89 RS, and said "Love the car, it's fantastic!"
My car, probably worth $1600-2000 at the MOST, got raves that other people driving $30,000 cars couldn't possibly get.
something cool...my wife and I pulled up to a Christmas party last week at a house probably valued at $500,000 (quite a house for Texas, I know in some parts of the country that amount doesn't get you much) Anyway, we puller up and the hostess saw my 89 RS, and said "Love the car, it's fantastic!"
My car, probably worth $1600-2000 at the MOST, got raves that other people driving $30,000 cars couldn't possibly get.
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 482
Likes: 2
From: Tulsa Oklahoma
Car: 1990 IROC-Z 1LE
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: G92 3.23
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
There are a few third gen Camaros in the area I live in. I recognize them immediately, and smile each time. One of them has to be at best a V6, possibly a Duke. I envy them that they get to drive it daily. I have thought about picking up a second car to be my daily driver. I have long wanted an 88 IROC with T-tops. Right now I drive an older Blazer that we use to lug the family around, so it would be greedy of me to do so.
I'll just keep lookin' out, and smilin' when i see one.
I'll just keep lookin' out, and smilin' when i see one.
Last edited by Krik; Dec 24, 2010 at 07:00 AM.
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Houston Area
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 355, 6.0 (LQ4) soon
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 2.77 for now
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I'm talking about the people who drive it till its dead then junk it, or sell it to one of us. I use mine day to day also, I get nice camaro all the time, sometimes I have to wonder if they're talking to me lol, my cars not the greatest example........
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
People where I live want way too much for their thirdgen's. thirdgens, especially firebirds are pretty rare, I looked for months on craigslist before I bought mine and it was the first one that popped up so I jumped on it. I usually see camaro's for about 3k and up in ok shape with high miles. I found an 87 iroc hardtop a few months ago for 3300 that needed work, I offered the guy 1800 but he said he felt it was worth more than that. The car was stalling and the interior wasn't too good.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
he must have been watching mecum the day before. Most people have no idea how difficult and expensive it is to restore an car to that level, or even impossible (in the case of ultra low mileage cars)
Last edited by 58mark; Dec 23, 2010 at 11:05 PM.
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Part of the point of this thread is that some people are willing to spend thousands on engine parts but then want to cheap out on paint, trim and interior.
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota FL
Car: 99 WS6 / 00 SS / 11 CTS-V / 13 300
Engine: LS1 / LS1 / LSA / 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 4L60E / T-56 / 6L80E / W5A80
Axle/Gears: 3.23 / 3.42 Auburn / 3.23 / 2.62
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I wish I needed to use a third gen as daily transport. If I lost my job tomorrow, and had no demo, I would have no issue DD'ing the RS immediately. I would NOT drive it in the snow or rain if I could help it (having that much money tied up in an old car makes you neurotic
), but as nice-weather transport? Why not...it already has 119k on it.
), but as nice-weather transport? Why not...it already has 119k on it. Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 482
Likes: 2
From: Tulsa Oklahoma
Car: 1990 IROC-Z 1LE
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: G92 3.23
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 3
From: Lake Elsinore,CA
Car: 1999 F-1 Camaro Conv 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: A4/A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.27
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I sold My 1990 Iroc for $27,000.00 It depends on condition and the quality of the restoration as to how much someone is willing to pay for the car.
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Restored or super low-mile original (I'm assuming the latter)?
When did you sell it, I didn't see this one for sale on any of the online auto sites?
Give us some info/history about this car.
What is that color? Looks like the copper metallic but I am quite sure they didn't have that in 1990?
EDIT: looking at your pics in your sig link, I see that this car was originally white and has 140k miles on the clock, so it's a resto-mod...good to see that even a resto-mod is fetching such high prices and not just the low mile originals...though I am stunned you got $27k for it, but that's a good thing IMO.
Last edited by puma1552; Dec 24, 2010 at 08:09 PM.
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota FL
Car: 99 WS6 / 00 SS / 11 CTS-V / 13 300
Engine: LS1 / LS1 / LSA / 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 4L60E / T-56 / 6L80E / W5A80
Axle/Gears: 3.23 / 3.42 Auburn / 3.23 / 2.62
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
^^His car is Sunset Orange...I saw it in a magazine awhile back. Far from a stock car...but VERY nice, nonetheless.
Krik,
I cannot use 2 of mine as DDs either, for that reason. I have a Grundy policy on the IROC and TA. I specifically DON'T have one on my RS because I like driving it too much!
Krik,
I cannot use 2 of mine as DDs either, for that reason. I have a Grundy policy on the IROC and TA. I specifically DON'T have one on my RS because I like driving it too much!
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Looking more at that car I hope my comment didn't come off douchebaggish--that car is worth every penny of that $27,000...THAT'S how you restore a car, and THAT'S how you do a color change.
I am very envious.
I am very envious.
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 482
Likes: 2
From: Tulsa Oklahoma
Car: 1990 IROC-Z 1LE
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: G92 3.23
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Originally Posted by Jason E
Krik,
I cannot use 2 of mine as DDs either, for that reason. I have a Grundy policy on the IROC and TA. I specifically DON'T have one on my RS because I like driving it too much!
I cannot use 2 of mine as DDs either, for that reason. I have a Grundy policy on the IROC and TA. I specifically DON'T have one on my RS because I like driving it too much!
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 3
From: Lake Elsinore,CA
Car: 1999 F-1 Camaro Conv 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: A4/A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.27
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 3
From: Lake Elsinore,CA
Car: 1999 F-1 Camaro Conv 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: A4/A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.27
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 3
From: Lake Elsinore,CA
Car: 1999 F-1 Camaro Conv 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: A4/A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.27
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Sent them out to a collision wheel specialist. They striped them and made sure they were straight before they powder coated them machined the faces and powder coated them clear. Cost was $125.00 a wheel. The 1le brakes are awsome. I bought the calipers online from Autozone. They say they are rebuild but I got two brand new calipers for $120.00 and a gift card for $50.00. Autozone and Rockauto still sell the calipers.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 101
From: Spokane WA
Car: 92 Lingenfelter Z28 articwhite
Engine: Aluminum 615BBC
Transmission: Th400wbrake/curri entps9" locker
Axle/Gears: 4.11/4.30/4.56
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
then you get the the after market moded car like a lingenfelter stage 5 Z28. (with his sig on the dash)
and keep it for the last 18 years. (not listed in any book)
and keep it for the last 18 years. (not listed in any book)
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
If it got a color change, then it wasn't actually restored. It was fully built like any other fully custom car. Maybe with a lot of stock type parts, but if it wasn't repainted its original color that it rolled out of the factory with? Then it wasn't actually restored. Just built really nice.
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
If it got a color change, then it wasn't actually restored. It was fully built like any other fully custom car. Maybe with a lot of stock type parts, but if it wasn't repainted its original color that it rolled out of the factory with? Then it wasn't actually restored. Just built really nice.
It's condition has been restored.
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Not semantics. Facts are facts. Run its VIN & it will come back as leaving the assembly line painted a different color.
Back to original, including paint, is RESTORED. Anything else is Modified. Nice build, but not a true restoration. Its condition has been MODIFIED, not Restored.
Back to original, including paint, is RESTORED. Anything else is Modified. Nice build, but not a true restoration. Its condition has been MODIFIED, not Restored.
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Not semantics. Facts are facts. Run its VIN & it will come back as leaving the assembly line painted a different color.
Back to original, including paint, is RESTORED. Anything else is Modified. Nice build, but not a true restoration. Its condition has been MODIFIED, not Restored.
Back to original, including paint, is RESTORED. Anything else is Modified. Nice build, but not a true restoration. Its condition has been MODIFIED, not Restored.
It's condition has been restored. It's state has been modified.
Condition==flawless, as left the factory. The condition is just as it was the day it rolled out of the factory==perfect.
State==different, changed from as left the factory. Same car, same condition, just different color.
A mint condition car is a mint condition car, and is independent of originality. Condition has absolutely nothing to do with what it started as in terms of color or anything else.
But really, why are you being petty? Maybe you should tell the owner it's not a restoration, he's the one who used the term to describe his own $30k car.
I'm not at all disagreeing with you, I agree restored generally means stock but it really is just semantics for the sake of being argumentative. Restoration is a term that is usually applied loosely, and it's really not a big deal. It's not a question of incorrect information spreading, like saying there were 1LE cars in 1985. It's just a petty bone to pick.
But honestly who cares? It's a beautiful car and it was built the right way, even if the color was changed, so just drop it.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Georgia, USA!
Car: 86 Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: 4.8 LS 68mm turbo
Transmission: Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: 3.08 10 bolt
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I'm a little worried that our cars might end up like 1st and 2nd gen camaros. I love these cars and don't ever want to have to pay a lot of money for one. I've had 2 firebirds, and 2 camaros, and all of them were $200, $600, $2000, and $3000. I would hate it if I had to pay a lot of money for a nice one. I love these cars so much. The looks I get from driving mine the compliments, the offers, they just make it so enjoyable. Not to mention the 400hp on tap
But back to the topic, I love driving these cars and hope they stay plentiful and cheap. (I have noticed the price going up for decent ones over the past 5 years though
)
Does anyone feel like the 4th gens will ever reach the "dirt cheap" status?
But back to the topic, I love driving these cars and hope they stay plentiful and cheap. (I have noticed the price going up for decent ones over the past 5 years though
)Does anyone feel like the 4th gens will ever reach the "dirt cheap" status?
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I love these cars and don't ever want to have to pay a lot of money for one.
Does anyone feel like the 4th gens will ever reach the "dirt cheap" status?
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 9
From: Kitchener, ON
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Restored means returned to original. Restorations are done with varying degrees of accuracy. For example, a car may not have the correct date code on the upper rad hose, but could still pass as restored, it's just not as good as it could be. But an aftermarket intake, exhaust and a color change is not a resoration. I think the term for that is restomod, but I'm not sure.
And although the owner obviously isn't concealing the fact that the car was originally white, the doctored window sticker personally rubs me the wrong way. But the important point is that it didn't bother the guy with the $27k, and he did get an awesome car for his coin.
And although the owner obviously isn't concealing the fact that the car was originally white, the doctored window sticker personally rubs me the wrong way. But the important point is that it didn't bother the guy with the $27k, and he did get an awesome car for his coin.
Last edited by eseibel67; Dec 26, 2010 at 08:23 AM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
you could even get into the argument that painting a 3rd gen with BC/CC is not a restoration. That's why the impala (in my siggy link) is painted with lacquer
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Some 3rd gens are already looked upon as "trailer trash" and there is enough of a problem with people falsifying 1st gen F-bodies to increase their value. 3rd gen B4C/1LE/etc. are close behind & now people are creating fakes of lower model 3rd gens? 
......And although the owner obviously isn't concealing the fact that the car was originally white, the doctored window sticker personally rubs me the wrong way. But the important point is that it didn't bother the guy with the $27k, and he did get an awesome car for his coin.
Buyers point out bad things to lower prices. False documents definately qualify. Incorrect hoses/belts/tires....All that just amounts to not a 100% Restoration. False documents & color changes take it completely out of the Restoration category.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 9
From: Kitchener, ON
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
I don't think the purpose of the window sticker was to dupe the buyer, my guess is that the owner did it as an accessory (such as a plastic model of the car):
http://imageevent.com/ls1z28/1990iro...=0&w=1&s=0&z=2
The buyer simply paid $27k for a REALLY nice IROC. Buyers have to do thier own research or else they will pay $60k for a 1969 6 cylinder Camaro that's been through the Year One catalog.
Not today, but sometime in the future, a perfectly restored, documented 5.7 IROC will command a decent price. But this one won't qualify unless it's ripped apart and painted white.
http://imageevent.com/ls1z28/1990iro...=0&w=1&s=0&z=2
The buyer simply paid $27k for a REALLY nice IROC. Buyers have to do thier own research or else they will pay $60k for a 1969 6 cylinder Camaro that's been through the Year One catalog.
Not today, but sometime in the future, a perfectly restored, documented 5.7 IROC will command a decent price. But this one won't qualify unless it's ripped apart and painted white.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
Boy, I'm torn on this. On the one hand, I truly appreciate and respect the effort put into this restoration. You really don't see that kind of attention to detail on 3rd gens much. Typically, they're either well kept low miles originals or not. On the other hand, if it were me, I'd have redone it stock, or at least as stock as possible. For example, you can't get new front seat covers which say "CAMARO" on them like the factory ones did, due to licensing issues. Not much people like us can do about that. But my personal preference would have been to keep it it's factory color and stock powertrain. The 1LE front brake upgrade would be very, very, very tempting though. 
With all that said, he sure did a magnificent job on a magnificent car. And there aren't too many 3rd gens which have exchanged hands for that kind of money either.

With all that said, he sure did a magnificent job on a magnificent car. And there aren't too many 3rd gens which have exchanged hands for that kind of money either.
Last edited by chazman; Dec 26, 2010 at 10:52 AM.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: montreal-canada
Car: 1985 camaro Z/28
Engine: 305 V/8 4bbl carb
Transmission: T5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3-23 posi with 4 wheel discs
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
i really think that 3rd gens will go up in value as time goes on. there are still way too many to bring up any price at this time, but with time ..i really think they will attain a substantial value....but having said that , the mint or original cars will have much more value, but why would anyone want to buy a stock 3rd gen even in mint condtion for a large amount of money and keep it stock ? ,these cars were mostly show and no go,,it would be crazy to buy a 3rd gen for a lot of cash with a weak V8 motor and automatic and open diff with drums at the rear!!,,if the buyer is planning on buying it and and enjoying the car with an anemic V8 , a nissan sentra could beat you on take off and outrun you probably!!...i guess it all depends what you want from the car, i really like keeping 3rd gens look stock, but putting in a 350 and with posi diff and 4 wheel discs and with a 5 speed..this way it looks stock , but will get up and go and brake and handle with some of the best cars around...my 2 cents.
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood, FL
Car: '88 Black GTA, T-tops, digital dash
Engine: 5.7 TPI w/custom chip
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 327 posi
Re: Are third generations worth that much??
i really think that 3rd gens will go up in value as time goes on. there are still way too many to bring up any price at this time, but with time ..i really think they will attain a substantial value....but having said that , the mint or original cars will have much more value, but why would anyone want to buy a stock 3rd gen even in mint condtion for a large amount of money and keep it stock ? ,these cars were mostly show and no go,,it would be crazy to buy a 3rd gen for a lot of cash with a weak V8 motor and automatic and open diff with drums at the rear!!,,if the buyer is planning on buying it and and enjoying the car with an anemic V8 , a nissan sentra could beat you on take off and outrun you probably!!...i guess it all depends what you want from the car, i really like keeping 3rd gens look stock, but putting in a 350 and with posi diff and 4 wheel discs and with a 5 speed..this way it looks stock , but will get up and go and brake and handle with some of the best cars around...my 2 cents.









I Bought a new house and needed to remodel the kitchen. The money I got for the car paid for that and much more.