92 rs/z28 differences
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 862
Likes: 1
Car: 92 25th anv camaro rs
Engine: 305 tbi
Axle/Gears: 3.08s non posi
92 rs/z28 differences
well the title says it all, what are the differences between a 92 rs camaro and a 92 z28 camaro?
i now that the z has the high raise spoiler. rims different style. but what else? apperence wise and drivetrain wise. and interior wise. thanks for the help guys.
things i suspect are different would be the z has bigger sway bars, quicker streering box, and ummm thats it i guess.
both came with ttops, 5.7/auto(no ttops) or 5.0/auto or 5.0/5spd, all the nice extra options like power windows and locks etc etc...right?
i now that the z has the high raise spoiler. rims different style. but what else? apperence wise and drivetrain wise. and interior wise. thanks for the help guys.
things i suspect are different would be the z has bigger sway bars, quicker streering box, and ummm thats it i guess.
both came with ttops, 5.7/auto(no ttops) or 5.0/auto or 5.0/5spd, all the nice extra options like power windows and locks etc etc...right?
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 562
Likes: 27
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: LS3
Transmission: TR6060
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 3.73
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
Check this post out
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/body/549145-z28-rs.html
Heritage stripes could be ordered on either model. Out of 70,000 camaros made that year, only around 5,300 were z28's.
Roanoke, VA huh? That's where I bought my car this past June.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/body/549145-z28-rs.html
Heritage stripes could be ordered on either model. Out of 70,000 camaros made that year, only around 5,300 were z28's.
Roanoke, VA huh? That's where I bought my car this past June.
Last edited by Blackdog36; Dec 30, 2009 at 03:57 PM.
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
When you really get down to what makes a Z28 different then the RS, you've got hood blisters, fog lights, a spoiler, and badging. If you ignore the B4C you can also say the TPI engines weren't offered in the RS, which is accurate for the general masses. You can also say the RS wasn't offered with the FE2 suspension, G92, and most of the other performance equipment. However the entry level Z28 used the same F41 suspension the top of the line V8 RS used.
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 862
Likes: 1
Car: 92 25th anv camaro rs
Engine: 305 tbi
Axle/Gears: 3.08s non posi
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
haha nice, which one? theres always a few camaros for sell here. bit over priced IMO but still for sell.
and ok thanks guys, and to clearify this
z28 has iroc hood, fog lights, the badging, the high raise spoiler, factory with f41 and the performance options such as the g92 and fe2. was there other packages?
also noob here but g92 is the posi rear end with disc brakes...right?
and fe2 is ??? bigger sways and quicker streering?
and ok thanks guys, and to clearify this
z28 has iroc hood, fog lights, the badging, the high raise spoiler, factory with f41 and the performance options such as the g92 and fe2. was there other packages?
also noob here but g92 is the posi rear end with disc brakes...right?
and fe2 is ??? bigger sways and quicker streering?
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
The Z28 doesn't have an IROC hood, it had the same base hood as the IROC/Z28 but "Blisters" instead of Louvers.
G92 is the performance rear axle ratio. G80 is posi, rear disks are also seperate.
The FE2 includes thicker sway bars, but I am not sure what else.
G92 is the performance rear axle ratio. G80 is posi, rear disks are also seperate.
The FE2 includes thicker sway bars, but I am not sure what else.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 562
Likes: 27
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: LS3
Transmission: TR6060
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 3.73
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
Yah, was a bit overpriced considering it has bad paint job and dents in bumpers. Picked it up since very low miles and no rust. Plus it's a Z 
Check out these links on RPO's
http://www.austinthirdgen.org/index.php?pid=30
http://www.austinthirdgen.org/mkport....html#92camaro
J65 was for 4 wheel disc brakes.

Check out these links on RPO's
http://www.austinthirdgen.org/index.php?pid=30
http://www.austinthirdgen.org/mkport....html#92camaro
J65 was for 4 wheel disc brakes.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 862
Likes: 1
Car: 92 25th anv camaro rs
Engine: 305 tbi
Axle/Gears: 3.08s non posi
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
ok ya i was reading more about the "power" hood, thanks tho. and ok so reading i like my suspension to be stiff so would the f41 be better fe2?
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
In a nutshell.
FE1 = soft
F41 = stiffer
FE2 = stiffest
F41 was the upgraded suspension for the V8 RS, and the standard suspension on the Z28. FE2 was optional on the Z28 only.
FE1 = soft
F41 = stiffer
FE2 = stiffest
F41 was the upgraded suspension for the V8 RS, and the standard suspension on the Z28. FE2 was optional on the Z28 only.
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 862
Likes: 1
Car: 92 25th anv camaro rs
Engine: 305 tbi
Axle/Gears: 3.08s non posi
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
ok cool thanks a lot. now to start a defferent thread on whats makes a fe2 option...unless any one wana share. i read that its bigger sways but didnt find much else. now i assume its stiffer shocks/struts and ??? i owuld like to think a different streering box.
a g92 axle fe2 suspension...and umm what else was z28 only? besides the hood/spoiler
Drew you said other performance packages...like what?
a g92 axle fe2 suspension...and umm what else was z28 only? besides the hood/spoiler
Drew you said other performance packages...like what?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 4
From: Killam, AB
Car: 1989 IrocZ Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 - 5 Speed Standard
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
Other general differences I believe that weren't specifically mentioned yet include . . .
- Of all the Camaro paint colours offered in '92, two were only available on the RS . . . Dark Green/Grey Metallic (GM code 18 - WA 9795) and Medium Polo Green II Metallic (GM code 45 - WA 9539).
- RPO KC4 - Engine oil cooler only available on the Z28.
- RPO QLC - P245/50ZR16 tires optional only on the Z28.
- The RS standard wheel size was a 15" and 16" as an option. The Z28's standard wheel size was 16".
- Depending on options, the '92 RS coupe originally sold for ~$12,500US and the Z28 ~$17,000US.
- Of all the Camaro paint colours offered in '92, two were only available on the RS . . . Dark Green/Grey Metallic (GM code 18 - WA 9795) and Medium Polo Green II Metallic (GM code 45 - WA 9539).
- RPO KC4 - Engine oil cooler only available on the Z28.
- RPO QLC - P245/50ZR16 tires optional only on the Z28.
- The RS standard wheel size was a 15" and 16" as an option. The Z28's standard wheel size was 16".
- Depending on options, the '92 RS coupe originally sold for ~$12,500US and the Z28 ~$17,000US.
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
ok cool thanks a lot. now to start a defferent thread on whats makes a fe2 option...unless any one wana share. i read that its bigger sways but didnt find much else. now i assume its stiffer shocks/struts and ??? i owuld like to think a different streering box.
a g92 axle fe2 suspension...and umm what else was z28 only? besides the hood/spoiler
Drew you said other performance packages...like what?
a g92 axle fe2 suspension...and umm what else was z28 only? besides the hood/spoiler
Drew you said other performance packages...like what?
F41 is in the middle. It's an upgrade over the base suspension that usually included stiffer springs, thicker sway bars, improved steering, 16" wheels, and possibly harder rubber bushings and specially valved shocks/struts.
FE2 takes it a step further adding even larger sway bars, even stiffer springs, 245/50 tires, etc. They've got stiffer bushings and special shocks/struts.
I didn't say other packages, I said other performance equipment. In general, throwing out the B4C since it didn't apply to most people, the RS was a mid-level car. You couldn't get a TPI drivetrain, you couldn't get an upgraded axle ratio, you couldn't get an engine oil cooler, dual converters, 245/50 tires, etc. The best RS you could get was extremely tame.
Where it starts to get blurry is that you could buy a fairly lame Z28 in 91/92 by not selecting the G92 option. A LB9 automatic car with 2.73 gears, a single cat converter, F41 suspension, and so on is a really boring car, that isn't going to feel that much different then a F41 L03 RS. Now if you compare that same limp Z28 with a G92 Z28 look out.
There's a lot of performance gain between that basic Z28, and a fully loaded Z28, when essentially they look the same to a casual observer. Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 101
From: Spokane WA
Car: 92 Lingenfelter Z28 articwhite
Engine: Aluminum 615BBC
Transmission: Th400wbrake/curri entps9" locker
Axle/Gears: 4.11/4.30/4.56
Re: 92 rs/z28 differences
what are the differences between a 92 rs camaro and a 92 z28 camaro?
the Z28 was a better looking car.
the Z28 Had more HP and was faster.
the Z28 was a better looking car.
the Z28 Had more HP and was faster.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Numbah-1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
Sep 12, 2015 08:57 PM









thanks every one i believe i got my complete list of differences

