CCC AND NON CCC
Thread Starter
Supreme Member




Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 348
From: CT
Car: 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0 Liter 4-BBL V8 High Output
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
CCC AND NON CCC
I Never Knew CCC Was An Option In 1984,Though It Was Required On All Cars.
Supreme Member



Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 68
From: Atlanta
Car: '02 T/A WS6, '91 T/A, '91 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1, LB9, L03
Transmission: T56, 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 10 bolt, 2.73 10 bolts
Re: CCC AND NON CCC
My guess is the only non-CCC cars were export cars.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,918
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: CCC AND NON CCC
Yup; not really a "guess", or maybe, just a good one; it was not legal to sell a non-CC one in the US due to emissions regulations.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 24
From: Midwest
Car: '82 Recaro T/A, '71 Trans Am
Engine: 305CFI/455HO
Transmission: TH700R4/M22
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42
Re: CCC AND NON CCC
This is from a Canadian brochure. Computer control was a $400 option. '81-up US-spec cars had standard computer control due to emission regulations. Export cars could be had with non-computer control until '88 when the last of the carbureted engines were fitted with TBI. The export High Output versions of the 2.8L V6(LL1) and 5.0L V8(L69) engines always had computer control because they had high compression and their HP rating and performance was designed with the use of the CCC system.
The 2.5 Iron Duke(and Cross-Fire 5.0 for that matter) were EFI and not technically CCC. CCC was generally referred to carbureted engines.
Anybody notice the typo for the HO engine? Its listed as RPO LG9 instead of L69. Whoever typed up the brochure that day wasn't wearing their reading glasses!
The 2.5 Iron Duke(and Cross-Fire 5.0 for that matter) were EFI and not technically CCC. CCC was generally referred to carbureted engines.
Anybody notice the typo for the HO engine? Its listed as RPO LG9 instead of L69. Whoever typed up the brochure that day wasn't wearing their reading glasses!
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 10
From: Kitchener, ON
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: CCC AND NON CCC
I did notice that. No doubt an error of sloppy handwriting when the text was entered off of someone else's notes and wasn't proof read. Somebody thought the handwritten "6" was a "G". We never see these types of errors anymore.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Street Lethal
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Aug 13, 2015 08:28 PM
1992 Trans Am
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 8, 2015 08:16 PM






