History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Need some more 92 T/A answers!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2001 | 05:30 PM
  #1  
ChevyKen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 24
From: Stavanger area, Norway
Car: 86 IROC Convt
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Need some more 92 T/A answers!

Can anyone answer me on these few questions:

1. Was rear discs optional or standard on 92 T/A's? If not, what options gave rear discs?

2. Is the rated 245hp for the L98 with or without dual cats. Also, was dual cats standard for this year?

3. Was the Th700r4 the only available Auto for 1992?

Thanks,

Ken
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2001 | 07:05 PM
  #2  
p.haze92's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
1)G92 coded cars came with the rear discs only I believe.

2)With dual cats only on Camaro's, the T/A's had 235 or 240hp due to different inlet tract.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2001 | 07:07 PM
  #3  
p.haze92's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Hit the enter button too early.

3)Yes
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2001 | 07:46 PM
  #4  
92TRANSAMWS6's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: E-town,KY
Originally posted by p.haze92
1)G92 coded cars came with the rear discs only I believe.
Nope, my car isn't a G92 but it has 4 wheel discs... they were also a part of the WS6 option.....yet 92GTAs car doesn't have them...strange.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2001 | 08:05 PM
  #5  
92GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 15
From: CA
From my understanding you could not get rear disks with the 305/auto combo. When the buyer of my GTA ordered it with the 305 then deleted the 5-spd and ordered the auto the rear disk were deleted and he said he could not order them at time either. This was also in the early 92 model year too when they were having problems with the rear disks so that might be why in my GTA's case.....
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2001 | 10:08 PM
  #6  
p.haze92's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Sorry guys, forgot that pontiac didn't use the G92 code. My mistake.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2001 | 10:22 PM
  #7  
92GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 15
From: CA
Actually Pontiac DID use RPO G92 as an option group or an indiviual option if you deleted what it usually came with, it later became part of the R6P option group though.....

If my GTA had the standard 5-spd it would have R6P option group with the G92, N10, etc......
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2001 | 10:37 PM
  #8  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
240HP for 92 GTA.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2001 | 12:30 PM
  #9  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Since you're asking about a 92 T/A and L98 I'll assume you're asking about that combo. For 92 the L98 required dual cats and rear discs, the only exceptions were if the car falls in with the group that had the discs deleted. The HP specs for pretty much every L98 Pontiac 88-up from what I've seen are very questionable. Having worked with both the Camaro and Firebird I can't see any reason why the L98 in the Camaro would really have any more power than the same engine int he Firebird. My conclusion is that GM skewed the numbers for their own marketing reasons the same as they have been doing since the 60's.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2001 | 01:08 PM
  #10  
ChevyKen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 24
From: Stavanger area, Norway
Car: 86 IROC Convt
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Thanks a lot for all the info guys! I really appreciate it!


Ken
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2001 | 01:49 PM
  #11  
karfreek's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fultonville, NY
Originally posted by Drew
Having worked with both the Camaro and Firebird I can't see any reason why the L98 in the Camaro would really have any more power than the same engine int he Firebird. My conclusion is that GM skewed the numbers for their own marketing reasons the same as they have been doing since the 60's.

The intake for the camaro went over the radiator behind the bumper. The Formula/GTA/TA have the ducting that goes around the radiator to a VERY restrictive air canister.



Jay
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2001 | 06:40 PM
  #12  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Ok we all agree that the factory horse power numbers are taken from the crank, why would they dyno the engines with different intakes? Besides that the Camaro intake has one advantage over the Firebird in the intake system, and thats the place where it picks up air. Both intake ducting setups are equally restrictive. Look at a camaro airbox before the air silencers are removed and tell me thats not more restrictive then the 3" round opening on 88-92 Firebirds. The intake ducting is only a reasonable argument for 85-87 TPI firebirds since their system was totally whacked in the head.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2001 | 11:08 PM
  #13  
karfreek's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Fultonville, NY
The camaro picks up cool fresh air from behind the bumper. The Firebird gets warm air from the engine compartment. The opening in the canister is not very big either.

The engines have to be dynoed as they sit in the car, so the ducts would have to be attached.

Jay
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2001 | 08:39 AM
  #14  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Say what u like, both Firebird intakes are more restrictive and not designed as good as the Camaros, and thats what I think made the difference, even if they estimated it. I also agree with the previous post.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2012sergen11
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
6
Oct 13, 2015 07:38 PM
HoosierinWA
Tech / General Engine
5
Oct 7, 2015 10:15 AM
kkirch15
Interior
2
Sep 30, 2015 04:44 PM
Aaronv808
Members Firebirds
9
Sep 30, 2015 12:55 PM
92projectcamaro
Engine Swap
4
Sep 29, 2015 07:07 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.