History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 06:31 PM
  #201  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

I'm just not a fan of LS motors....not at all....I mean I know they make big HP numbers, etc and are light weight but damn, they are ugly as hell
under the hood - make mine a built L98 TPI without the smog stuff and loose the heater hoses and valve, etc - now that looks good !!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 06:48 PM
  #202  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

The heater bypass stays. The snobbiest thing I enjoy is driving around in my Formula when it's 100 degrees out, and I've got the A/C blasting. As an adult fat kid, I'll never, ever, ever again be without A/C. Everything and anything that contributes to that goal... STAYS.

What I'd like to see are Camaro gauge movements that are modernized, faces that are backlit, but maintain the vintage look. THAT would be slick. Might be the #1 reason I prefer 86-92 Firebirds and 90-92 Camaros over the 82-89 Camaros. Something about those gauges lit around the edges are just clunky as hell.

The LS1 might actually look best without the Corvette injector/coil covers. It'll never look as good as a clean TPI, but it can look at home under the hood of a thirdgen.

I had a nightmare last night about all the bright red aftermarket suspension parts. Like I was flipping through the magazine, and every single car was packed full of bright red stuff. Something about that just gets under my skin. It's too obvious that it's seeking attention... That trend, and black wheels can go away any day now.

/Babbling.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 06:49 PM
  #203  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Why does the heater bypass stay ?? You dont need it to make the A/C work
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 06:56 PM
  #204  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 643
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

I'd like it better if the interior wasn't hacked up. That IP is terrible.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 06:59 PM
  #205  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

One other thing.....will this thread ever fade off into the sunset ??
It's like the energizer bunny.....it just keeps going and going.....
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 07:08 PM
  #206  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 643
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by BizJetTech
One other thing.....will this thread ever fade off into the sunset ??
It's like the energizer bunny.....it just keeps going and going.....
I was just thinking that!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 07:10 PM
  #207  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 643
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by dagwood
I like this one....


https://youtu.be/OHJOX_Jc09s
So I guess the $64K question is, what would this car sell for, compared to a mint bone stock one?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 07:14 PM
  #208  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by chazman
So I guess the $64K question is, what would this car sell for, compared to a mint bone stock one?
I'd say 30-50 % less....
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 07:18 PM
  #209  
dagwood's Avatar
Supreme Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 1,267
From: In the paint booth!
Car: 1986 Camaro Drag Car
Engine: 383 on Ethanol
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 4.86 Currie 9 inch
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by chazman
So I guess the $64K question is, what would this car sell for, compared to a mint bone stock one?
I'm wondering the same thing. I would not trade mine for it.....I do know that...so in my opinion, I think it would bring less.

I do think that car would bring more if the interior originality was there, but I still feel it would fall short of a mint original car. I guess it would depend on the buyer, though
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 07:21 PM
  #210  
dagwood's Avatar
Supreme Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 1,267
From: In the paint booth!
Car: 1986 Camaro Drag Car
Engine: 383 on Ethanol
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 4.86 Currie 9 inch
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by BizJetTech
I'd say 30-50 % less....
I'd say 25% less......just my opinion.....as long as the interior stuff was back to original
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 07:25 PM
  #211  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Just try selling that car.....I dare ya!
It would take FOREVER to find a buyer.....thats just my opinion
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 07:29 PM
  #212  
dagwood's Avatar
Supreme Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 1,267
From: In the paint booth!
Car: 1986 Camaro Drag Car
Engine: 383 on Ethanol
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 4.86 Currie 9 inch
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by BizJetTech
Just try selling that car.....I dare ya!
It would take FOREVER to find a buyer.....thats just my opinion

I'm actually the kind of guy that would be a buyer for that car. I'd make changes, yes, but could definitely be interested in it. I have a mint, low mile original, and would love to have one like that, that I could drive all the time and enjoy..
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 07:33 PM
  #213  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by dagwood
I'm actually the kind of guy that would be a buyer for that car. I'd make changes, yes, but could definitely be interested in it. I have a mint, low mile original, and would love to have one like that, that I could drive all the time and enjoy..
Big difference between "would" and "will".....it's easy to speculate but fact of the matter is finding a buyer
for that type of car is difficult at best....
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 07:36 PM
  #214  
dagwood's Avatar
Supreme Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 1,267
From: In the paint booth!
Car: 1986 Camaro Drag Car
Engine: 383 on Ethanol
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 4.86 Currie 9 inch
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by BizJetTech
Big difference between "would" and "will".....it's easy to speculate but fact of the matter is finding a buyer
for that type of car is difficult at best....
Yep, I agree.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2018 | 09:50 PM
  #215  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,920
Likes: 885
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

I suppose that'll always be an issue with the modified car. Good taste is subjective.
That said, it depends too on your motivation in buying a given vehicle and again, what your personal taste is.
While not to say the 3rd gen isn't a classic (yet), using the muscle car as an example, say a late 60s Chev (just about anything) in stock, poorly optioned/low performance orientated form, just aren't appealing in my personal opinion and I'd take a well crafted hot rod version if it came down to it. I'd go so far as to say the same about a 3rd gen Camaro. Which not coincidentally is why my 86 ( stock, poorly optioned/low performance orientated) Coupe no longer is. Knowing that recouping much from the build, (and that wasn't the plan in the first place), I still went ahead with the direction I did. It doesn't however take away from the curiosity of what it , along with others out there, might be worth. As was pointed out, as the best of the 3rd gens appreciate in general, so do the variants that follow.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 12:43 AM
  #216  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by BizJetTech
Why does the heater bypass stay ?? You dont need it to make the A/C work
But you'll get more cold air without the heater core radiating nearby. If it would allow me to freeze my passenger's like the T-1000 on MAX, I'd have five bypass valves under my hood.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 11:40 AM
  #217  
vinny R's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 286
From: Florida
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Auburn
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by skinny z
I suppose that'll always be an issue with the modified car. Good taste is subjective.
That said, it depends too on your motivation in buying a given vehicle and again, what your personal taste is.
While not to say the 3rd gen isn't a classic (yet), using the muscle car as an example, say a late 60s Chev (just about anything) in stock, poorly optioned/low performance orientated form, just aren't appealing in my personal opinion and I'd take a well crafted hot rod version if it came down to it. I'd go so far as to say the same about a 3rd gen Camaro. Which not coincidentally is why my 86 ( stock, poorly optioned/low performance orientated) Coupe no longer is. Knowing that recouping much from the build, (and that wasn't the plan in the first place), I still went ahead with the direction I did. It doesn't however take away from the curiosity of what it , along with others out there, might be worth. As was pointed out, as the best of the 3rd gens appreciate in general, so do the variants that follow.
I just don't think the restos will ever be worth as much as originals at least in 3rd gen world and in my lifetime. I think the production numbers were to high. The 60's Chevys were not produced in the numbers like the 3rd gens. I think I heard 2 million + 3rd gens. Because it is harder to get the later 60's era cars, not as many produced and more time has gone by, that any of them, resto or not just get more $$ at sale.
IMHO the above resto is an example of this. If you want a 1st gen your choices are slim to what is out there reasonably priced. You may have to live with someones questionable choices. If you want a third 3rd gen resto and you don't like what you see, you can still find a car to modify to your liking.

The car above would be lucky to get 1/2 of what that would be in low mileage showroom condition.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 12:51 PM
  #218  
ray jr's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 65
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

this is what a modded iroc is supposed to look like .. i kept it looking as factory as possible .. nothing like adding a 100 horsepower and looking stock



Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 04:00 PM
  #219  
KMK454's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 48
From: CA
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by BizJetTech
I'm just not a fan of LS motors....not at all....I mean I know they make big HP numbers, etc and are light weight but damn, they are ugly as hell
under the hood - make mine a built L98 TPI without the smog stuff and loose the heater hoses and valve, etc - now that looks good !!
I prefer TPI builds like you; however, I'm not anti-LS. I do think LS-swapping old American stuff is often the lazy route and at this point it's been done ad nauseam. I give far more appreciation to the period correct TPI build that leaves some horsepower and reliability on the table by nixing the LS. But I'm not sure I'd call them all ugly. In the C5 and C6 Corvettes, they looked good.

Also, a lot of the vintage Chevy guys have made amazing dress up kits for them:



https://www.hotrod.com/articles/you-...ine-is-an-ls3/

I wonder if a TPI-style intake could be done...
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 04:04 PM
  #220  
KMK454's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 48
From: CA
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by ray jr
this is what a modded iroc is supposed to look like .. i kept it looking as factory as possible .. nothing like adding a 100 horsepower and looking stock
I can't tell where the extra 100 horses are coming from... built internals? NOS?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 04:53 PM
  #221  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by KMK454
I prefer TPI builds like you; however, I'm not anti-LS. I do think LS-swapping old American stuff is often the lazy route and at this point it's been done ad nauseam. I give far more appreciation to the period correct TPI build that leaves some horsepower and reliability on the table by nixing the LS. But I'm not sure I'd call them all ugly. In the C5 and C6 Corvettes, they looked good.

Also, a lot of the vintage Chevy guys have made amazing dress up kits for them:



https://www.hotrod.com/articles/you-...ine-is-an-ls3/

I wonder if a TPI-style intake could be done...
That one looks pretty cool Kurt - but it's WAY more $$$ then you'd have into a cool L98 TPI build
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 07:16 PM
  #222  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,920
Likes: 885
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

.

Last edited by skinny z; Dec 11, 2018 at 08:09 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 07:20 PM
  #223  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by ray jr
this is what a modded iroc is supposed to look like .. i kept it looking as factory as possible .. nothing like adding a 100 horsepower and looking stock
Looking good Ray !!
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 09:17 PM
  #224  
ray jr's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 65
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by KMK454
I can't tell where the extra 100 horses are coming from... built internals? NOS?
cam , afr heads , tpi big mouth lower intake,as&m runners ,ported plenum and throttle body, dyno dons headers , 3 inch exhaust with factory style tailpipes , and precision convertor .. also tuned to perfection ...
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 09:18 PM
  #225  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 643
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by ray jr
this is what a modded iroc is supposed to look like .. i kept it looking as factory as possible .. nothing like adding a 100 horsepower and looking stock



Love. It.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2018 | 11:17 AM
  #226  
KMK454's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 48
From: CA
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by ray jr
cam , afr heads , tpi big mouth lower intake,as&m runners ,ported plenum and throttle body, dyno dons headers , 3 inch exhaust with factory style tailpipes , and precision convertor .. also tuned to perfection ...
I love it, thanks for sharing. Do you have a build thread? That's the route I want to "ruin" my car with, but there seem to be few cohesive LB9/L98 tech threads that lay out cool period correct builds like yours. I imagine an LB9 wouldn't see near the gains, though, but I'd be really happy to go from 230 to 275hp.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2018 | 12:25 PM
  #227  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by KMK454
II imagine an LB9 wouldn't see near the gains, though, but I'd be really happy to go from 230 to 275hp.
Who says it has to be an LB9? If the goal is to appear stock, a 350 can easily pass for a 305.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2018 | 03:27 PM
  #228  
KMK454's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 48
From: CA
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by Drew
Who says it has to be an LB9? If the goal is to appear stock, a 350 can easily pass for a 305.
The value proposition of my 30k mile B4C T5 is its originality. Everything I've done thus far is reversible, and the car can be back in stock form (including original tires) in a weekend. Yes, an L98 swap is reversible, but that's a bridge too far. For a fun street car, the T5 LB9 is already there, but who wouldn't want a tad more pep across the board?
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2018 | 05:10 PM
  #229  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Splitting hairs. Objectively you have to decide what is important. A G92 LB9 is already pushing it for a 305. There is no room for improvement.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2018 | 07:28 PM
  #230  
DynoDave43's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 919
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by Drew
Splitting hairs. Objectively you have to decide what is important. A G92 LB9 is already pushing it for a 305. There is no room for improvement.
Wait...I thought the 305 WON the torque battle?
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2018 | 07:39 PM
  #231  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by DynoDave43
Wait...I thought the 305 WON the torque battle?
No sir, the L98 has a somewhat more low end torque then the LB9 - theres no replacement for displacement
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2018 | 11:00 PM
  #232  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by DynoDave43
Wait...I thought the 305 WON the torque battle?
Only with the 5spd, 3.42s, and pixie dust.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 08:35 AM
  #233  
dlinger's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 300
Likes: 18
From: Laurel, MT
Car: 1984 Z28 HO
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by DynoDave43
Wait...I thought the 305 WON the torque battle?
Someone stirring the pot?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 01:35 PM
  #234  
KMK454's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 48
From: CA
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Ah, good old TGO... "What simple, period bolt-ons add pep to the LB9 for my modest, reasonable hp goals that are focused on fun, streetable power?"

"L98 swap it!"
"Cut a trap door for the fuel pump!"
"Get the Daytona Cowl Hood!"
"LSx NATION!"
"200 shot of NOS!"

Thanks!
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 01:49 PM
  #235  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by KMK454
Ah, good old TGO... "What simple, period bolt-ons add pep to the LB9 for my modest, reasonable hp goals that are focused on fun, streetable power?"

"L98 swap it!"
"Cut a trap door for the fuel pump!"
"Get the Daytona Cowl Hood!"
"LSx NATION!"
"200 shot of NOS!"

Thanks!
Noooooo.....not to the B4C.... leave it original and pick up another one to mod....or sell it to me
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 02:13 PM
  #236  
dmccain's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 811
From: South Ms
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

KMK 454 your car is so dang nice the only thing I would do to it is...put gas in it and drive it!
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 03:48 PM
  #237  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by KMK454
Ah, good old TGO... "What simple, period bolt-ons add pep to the LB9 for my modest, reasonable hp goals that are focused on fun, streetable power?"

"L98 swap it!"
"Cut a trap door for the fuel pump!"
"Get the Daytona Cowl Hood!"
"LSx NATION!"
"200 shot of NOS!"

Thanks!
That's one way to interpret what I'm saying and put words in my mouth. Another way you could take it, is to leave it alone if you value the originality.

Sheesh... Act like I asked the stupid question, why don't you.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 03:56 PM
  #238  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

The 'stupid' question I'm referring to is the implied "How do I mod my car without modding my car, and while retaining it's value".

The short & stupid answer as A) You don't, or B) You decide if you want to modify it, or enjoy it the way it is.

You can't have it both ways.

Don't ever try to characterize something I say as suggesting -

"Cut a trap door for the fuel pump!"
"Get the Daytona Cowl Hood!"
"LSx NATION!"
"200 shot of NOS!"

I've never and will never suggest that kind of stupidity.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 05:46 PM
  #239  
KMK454's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 48
From: CA
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by Drew
Don't ever try to characterize something I say as suggesting -
Originally Posted by Drew
The 'stupid' question I'm referring to is the implied "How do I mod my car without modding my car, and while retaining it's value".


There are nuances to modification; there are plenty of cars that wear an aftermarket part here or there that, after very little wrenching, could go back to stock and cross the auction block for top thirdgen dollar. In some cases, it can help preserve vulnerable original parts - but there's a line. An L98 swap on an original LB9 crosses the line.

Your 350 "two cents" reminded me of the many threads where people ask about LB9 mods and don't want an engine swap, only to be immediately hit with useless responses recommending an L98 swap. The discussion in this thread was going that way, hence my sarcastic riff on the state of the "tech" board and some of the typical, unconstructive suggestions we can find here. My post wasn't attributing any quotes to you; if I was, I would have directly quoted you like I did in this post, where I quote you asking not to be mischaracterized as you mischaracterize something.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 05:47 PM
  #240  
KMK454's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 48
From: CA
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by dmccain
KMK 454 your car is so dang nice the only thing I would do to it is...put gas in it and drive it!
Thanks!

Originally Posted by BizJetTech
Noooooo.....not to the B4C.... leave it original and pick up another one to mod....or sell it to me
That post wasn't serious. Plus, I've already modified it with springs and wheels, but the originals are all boxed up. If you're serious about buying shoot me a generous offer
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 06:25 PM
  #241  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 643
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Kurt! Stop messing with your car!
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 07:16 PM
  #242  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by KMK454
Blah, blah, blah. Blah. Blah, blah.
You're dismissing the context of my reply, and missing my point. You said you wanted another 45hp, and implied you wanted it to look stock. While that's virtually impossible to do with a 305, you can get a lot closer with a 350. Your reply about potential negative impact to the car's originality, is in direct conflict with your goals. Do you want to keep the car original, or do you want another 45hp? You're apparently willing to rip the top half off the engine, but going the 1/4 mile further and pulling the block is a deal breaker?

Interesting that you noticed the emoticon, but completely misunderstood the message. Admittedly, I was posting my opinion, that cost you nothing, for you to take or leave. The further implication being to not let it get you all twisted up.

So you are tired of people suggesting the 350 swap when people ask about a 305... Guess what? I'm tired of people asking how to make their 305 perform like a 350. It's nearly 2019, Thirdgens have had 305s since 1982. Do you think there's some new trick to hopping up a 305? Some solution that's not in the archives that has been suggested a million times, and couldn't be found with a search?

My suggestion is logically sound. That it crosses some imaginary line, that you've drawn in the sand, doesn't make it ludicrous. Equating the 350 swap, to cutting a hole in the floor, or buying the worlds ugliest cowl hood, is a stretch. Adding 45hp to a 305 while appearing stock, fits in much better with your examples.

Sorry about your tiny engine, bro. Don't let it get you down, we've all been there. <<<See, that's a joke... Smile, nobody is picking on your 305.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 07:19 PM
  #243  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by chazman
Kurt! Stop messing with your car!
This...

If I had your car, I'd keep it in Ferris Bueller's glass garage and never drive it, much less start ripping apart the engine.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 07:22 PM
  #244  
DynoDave43's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 919
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

Originally Posted by Drew
Only with the 5spd, 3.42s, and pixie dust.
A little slower...I'm taking notes.

Originally Posted by dlinger
Someone stirring the pot?
Almost, virtually, close to never. But it slipped out.

Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 09:17 PM
  #245  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Re: Clean "base" '89 IROC-Z

It's all about the Pixie dust. You just have to believe! Or snort it... I hear that works too.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liljon285
Camaros for Sale
13
Jul 2, 2009 12:32 PM
scanman717
Tech / General Engine
3
May 11, 2004 10:13 PM
5.0L1992RS
Engine Swap
4
Apr 4, 2002 05:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 PM.