Was it 89 or 90?
01-28-2002, 02:26 AM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Was it 89 or 90?
Was 89 the last year you could get t-tops and the L98 together, or was it 90? I always thought 90, but for some reason i'm thinking it was actually 89. Can someone clear this up for me because I am trying to find my "dream" IROC, and this is actually what the main factor is... Thanks! BTW... i'm sure you don't recognize my name... i'd create a post introducing my self, but there is no lounge here, so i'll just be breif... I sold my IROC, and I REALLY miss it. I usually post at CamaroZ28.com and Stangnet. I think my GT is faster than my IROC 
... but I don't like owning a Ford 
Anyway, I will starting popping up around here more because I REALLY need to get back into the Camaro scene. Later!
... but I don't like owning a Ford Anyway, I will starting popping up around here more because I REALLY need to get back into the Camaro scene. Later! 
01-28-2002, 11:16 PM
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
I did do a search, but nothing came up. I remember there was a huge topic on this at cz28.com a year or so ago, but it has since been deleted. As far as the stang... i've owned them both... I trust my instincts... only the track can tell though.
01-29-2002, 12:10 AM
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 3,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you sit higher in your stang than in your old IROC? If so, that can lead to you feeling like you are going faster.
89 was the last year for the Camaro, no one has ever been able to provide proof of a factory t-top with L89 after '89. Some L89 equipped Pontiacs were built in later years with factory t-tops.
89 was the last year for the Camaro, no one has ever been able to provide proof of a factory t-top with L89 after '89. Some L89 equipped Pontiacs were built in later years with factory t-tops.
Last edited by Blue502; 01-29-2002 at 12:14 AM.
Trending Topics
01-30-2002, 01:48 AM
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
I definetly DON'T want this to turn into a Mustang vs. Camaro thread because that was happening all too often at Stangnet and I get tired of repeating the same f-body info over there. I will defend my car because I know it's potential. I wish I had another IROC, and that was the point of this thread... so I can start to search again (only this time, it is going to stay 100% stock). Once I sell my Mustang, it'll be an SS for sure (100% sure too ) but to answer the question... no, my Mustang has Eibach pro-kit springs whereas my IROC had the stock springs. Anyway, like I said, the track will be opening in the spring, and i'll have slips then, but I don't want to be known as the "@$$hole who likes Mustangs"... there are WAY too many of them around 
I know the true cars... :hail: IROC-Z 
... and as you'll notice... I registered in September of 99, right when I got my IROC, I just never posted here, but i've been around a LONG time The only thing this place needs is a Lounge...
) but to answer the question... no, my Mustang has Eibach pro-kit springs whereas my IROC had the stock springs. Anyway, like I said, the track will be opening in the spring, and i'll have slips then, but I don't want to be known as the "@$$hole who likes Mustangs"... there are WAY too many of them around I know the true cars... :hail: IROC-Z ... and as you'll notice... I registered in September of 99, right when I got my IROC, I just never posted here, but i've been around a LONG time
The only thing this place needs is a Lounge... Last edited by demonspeed; 01-30-2002 at 01:51 AM.