LTX and LSX Putting LT1s, LS1s, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

5.3L vs. 5.7L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 07:29 PM
  #1  
MMMichael's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
5.3L vs. 5.7L

Hey guys, i'm the new owner of an 89 rs. I am looking to swap an LS series motor into it, and i have been searching ls1's, but they are seeming to be too expensive. My question is that i can find a 5.3L for way cheaper and i have heard that the same cam and heads will work for either of the motors. Is this true? also, how hard is it to swap the 5.3 (or 5.7) into my RS? thanks. by the way, great site. Ive been a member for only a short time and i have already doubled my knowledge on third gens.

-Michael
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 08:39 PM
  #2  
ZONES89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
From: Hou. TX
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Yes, it is true, but it is still costly in the end. A LS swap is still not "cheap" like a SBC to SBC swap.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #3  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Welcome aboard thirdgen.org.

Read the sticky about LS1 swaps in the top section of this forum to get an idea of what is ahead of you.

There is a thread on ls1tech about doing an LSx swap for $1500 using the 5.3's. But, he's not putting them in 3rd gen f-bodies so he can keep the truck intake, oil pan, exhaust manifolds, and accessories. Add all of that to the cost of the engine when comparing it to a 4th gen f-body engine, then you can figure the rest of the costs and swap difficulties are a wash.

If you're going to use a truck engine, might as well make it a 6.0. They go for only a little more than the 5.3's.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 07:56 AM
  #4  
kowalzekc's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Originally Posted by five7kid
Welcome aboard thirdgen.org.

Read the sticky about LS1 swaps in the top section of this forum to get an idea of what is ahead of you.

There is a thread on ls1tech about doing an LSx swap for $1500 using the 5.3's. But, he's not putting them in 3rd gen f-bodies so he can keep the truck intake, oil pan, exhaust manifolds, and accessories. Add all of that to the cost of the engine when comparing it to a 4th gen f-body engine, then you can figure the rest of the costs and swap difficulties are a wash.

If you're going to use a truck engine, might as well make it a 6.0. They go for only a little more than the 5.3's.
I agree, unless you want the high rpms from the 5.3, the 6.0 is the way to go. I am looking at doing the same swap myself and I am torn between these two engines. I have heard with a head rebuild, cam swap and a few other things, you can crank out some outstanding power from the 6.0. A BIG expence in going to be headers, they run $800+ for a set of long tubes, but you can get away with 98+ fbody manifolds. Anouther option that some people choose to do is convert thier LSx to carb. You can run a traditional distributor or MSD makes a easy to install wiring harness and ingnition box to control timing. I will probably go with this route myself just because I do not want to mess with coputer tuning.

Welcome to the board, post some pictures of you projects as they progress.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 12:36 PM
  #5  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally Posted by kowalzekc
Anouther option that some people choose to do is convert thier LSx to carb. You can run a traditional distributor or MSD makes a easy to install wiring harness and ingnition box to control timing. I will probably go with this route myself just because I do not want to mess with coputer tuning.
Computer tuning is cheap in comparison. Also not likely to be needed.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #6  
kowalzekc's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Originally Posted by five7kid
Computer tuning is cheap in comparison. Also not likely to be needed.
Depends on application and modifications. Also, it is alot easier to tune at a track with a carb then with FI, unless you have all the programs and really know what you are doing. Also, it is cheaper to make big amounts of HP with a carb then FI. There is no worrying about high pressure injectors, larger fuel rails, and higher performance fuel managments systems. However, if you are just droping in a LSx motor and leaving stock, it is cheaper to keep the FI. I think to go carb it is going to cost me and extra 600+ easy and I think I am being modest. However I do think it is neat to see someone carb one of these, just my opinion.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 05:42 PM
  #7  
Shift06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 2
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LSX (swapping)
Transmission: 4L60E (swapping)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi 10 Bolt
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

I think an LS1 pullout is probably cheapest. Sure it's more initially than a 5.3 but you're going to have to buy an LS1 intake, fbody accessories, fbody pan, windage and pickup etc.. anyways. Unless you can do the whole swap for dirt cheap it wouldn't be worth it anyways. Most people can't seem to do it dirt cheap so an extra $XXX for the LS1 versus a 5.3 or whatever isn't going to be a huge deal when you look at the overall price of the swap.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 06:03 PM
  #8  
MMMichael's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Well what are the different in deciding a cam choice between a 5.3 and a 6.0? i have wondered about the 6.0 but i didnt know what the difference was in the internals as compared to the 5.7 LS1 or the 5.3. I found a cam from texas speed and i would like to know if it will work or not. thanks alot guys, this forum is helping me out ALOT.

-Michael
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 06:53 PM
  #9  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally Posted by Shift06
I think an LS1 pullout is probably cheapest. Sure it's more initially than a 5.3 but you're going to have to buy an LS1 intake, fbody accessories, fbody pan, windage and pickup etc.. anyways.
My point exactly.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 06:58 PM
  #10  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally Posted by kowalzekc
Depends on application and modifications. Also, it is alot easier to tune at a track with a carb then with FI, unless you have all the programs and really know what you are doing.
Highly unlikely to need to tune at the track. Unless you're going to the track to tune.
Originally Posted by kowalzekc
Also, it is cheaper to make big amounts of HP with a carb then FI. There is no worrying about high pressure injectors, larger fuel rails, and higher performance fuel managments systems.
Gen I SBC's, I'd agree. LSx, not true.

Originally Posted by kowalzekc
However, if you are just droping in a LSx motor and leaving stock, it is cheaper to keep the FI.
The OP hasn't indicated any particular use for the car. If we assume driver, then carb makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Originally Posted by kowalzekc
I think to go carb it is going to cost me and extra 600+ easy and I think I am being modest.
I think you're underestimating, unless you have most of the parts already in hand.

Originally Posted by kowalzekc
However I do think it is neat to see someone carb one of these, just my opinion.
I don't see anything neat about it, personally. Plenty have already done it. A couple in particular are very fast, but they're track cars, not DD's.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 08:13 PM
  #11  
kowalzekc's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Originally Posted by five7kid
Highly unlikely to need to tune at the track. Unless you're going to the track to tune.

Gen I SBC's, I'd agree. LSx, not true.


The OP hasn't indicated any particular use for the car. If we assume driver, then carb makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

I think you're underestimating, unless you have most of the parts already in hand.


I don't see anything neat about it, personally. Plenty have already done it. A couple in particular are very fast, but they're track cars, not DD's.
Learn new stuff everyday, I am looking at creating a track car.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 10:06 PM
  #12  
BlueZee28's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Originally Posted by MMMichael
Well what are the different in deciding a cam choice between a 5.3 and a 6.0? i have wondered about the 6.0 but i didnt know what the difference was in the internals as compared to the 5.7 LS1 or the 5.3. I found a cam from texas speed and i would like to know if it will work or not. thanks alot guys, this forum is helping me out ALOT.

-Michael
When you're talking about a GenIII block (LS1, LS6, LQ4, LQ9, 5.3L whatever it's acronym is...), a cam is a cam. It's like an old school sbc, cams are interchangable. Now, the behavior of the cam is going to vary slightly depending on which displacement you're going with. For instance, the Texas Speed 224R is a *relatively* small cam, and when you put it in a 6.0L it's nature will tone down slightly more. Bigger cubes tend to want bigger cams to get the same effect as a smaller cam in a smaller cube block. I put Texas Speed's MS4 cam in my 6.0, some say that is a nasty big cam, I say so what, and besides it's going in a 6.0 not a 5.7, so it will tone down slightly from what you'd experience with a regular LS1.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #13  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

right now just get it built with a 5.3. Later you can start on a better LSx using an L92 block, CNC-ported L92/LS3 heads, a stroker crank, and whatever else you'd really like.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rubblerubble
Transmissions and Drivetrain
18
Mar 13, 2016 06:57 PM
bjpotter
History / Originality
17
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 PM
bjpotter
History / Originality
21
Oct 2, 2015 09:12 AM
customblackbird
Power Adders
71
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM
3.8TransAM
Body
2
Sep 17, 2015 02:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 AM.