5.3L vs. 5.7L
5.3L vs. 5.7L
Hey guys, i'm the new owner of an 89 rs. I am looking to swap an LS series motor into it, and i have been searching ls1's, but they are seeming to be too expensive. My question is that i can find a 5.3L for way cheaper and i have heard that the same cam and heads will work for either of the motors. Is this true? also, how hard is it to swap the 5.3 (or 5.7) into my RS? thanks. by the way, great site. Ive been a member for only a short time and i have already doubled my knowledge on third gens.
-Michael
-Michael
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
From: Hou. TX
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L
Yes, it is true, but it is still costly in the end. A LS swap is still not "cheap" like a SBC to SBC swap.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Welcome aboard thirdgen.org.
Read the sticky about LS1 swaps in the top section of this forum to get an idea of what is ahead of you.
There is a thread on ls1tech about doing an LSx swap for $1500 using the 5.3's. But, he's not putting them in 3rd gen f-bodies so he can keep the truck intake, oil pan, exhaust manifolds, and accessories. Add all of that to the cost of the engine when comparing it to a 4th gen f-body engine, then you can figure the rest of the costs and swap difficulties are a wash.
If you're going to use a truck engine, might as well make it a 6.0. They go for only a little more than the 5.3's.
Read the sticky about LS1 swaps in the top section of this forum to get an idea of what is ahead of you.
There is a thread on ls1tech about doing an LSx swap for $1500 using the 5.3's. But, he's not putting them in 3rd gen f-bodies so he can keep the truck intake, oil pan, exhaust manifolds, and accessories. Add all of that to the cost of the engine when comparing it to a 4th gen f-body engine, then you can figure the rest of the costs and swap difficulties are a wash.
If you're going to use a truck engine, might as well make it a 6.0. They go for only a little more than the 5.3's.
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L
Welcome aboard thirdgen.org.
Read the sticky about LS1 swaps in the top section of this forum to get an idea of what is ahead of you.
There is a thread on ls1tech about doing an LSx swap for $1500 using the 5.3's. But, he's not putting them in 3rd gen f-bodies so he can keep the truck intake, oil pan, exhaust manifolds, and accessories. Add all of that to the cost of the engine when comparing it to a 4th gen f-body engine, then you can figure the rest of the costs and swap difficulties are a wash.
If you're going to use a truck engine, might as well make it a 6.0. They go for only a little more than the 5.3's.
Read the sticky about LS1 swaps in the top section of this forum to get an idea of what is ahead of you.
There is a thread on ls1tech about doing an LSx swap for $1500 using the 5.3's. But, he's not putting them in 3rd gen f-bodies so he can keep the truck intake, oil pan, exhaust manifolds, and accessories. Add all of that to the cost of the engine when comparing it to a 4th gen f-body engine, then you can figure the rest of the costs and swap difficulties are a wash.
If you're going to use a truck engine, might as well make it a 6.0. They go for only a little more than the 5.3's.
Welcome to the board, post some pictures of you projects as they progress.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Anouther option that some people choose to do is convert thier LSx to carb. You can run a traditional distributor or MSD makes a easy to install wiring harness and ingnition box to control timing. I will probably go with this route myself just because I do not want to mess with coputer tuning.
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L
Depends on application and modifications. Also, it is alot easier to tune at a track with a carb then with FI, unless you have all the programs and really know what you are doing. Also, it is cheaper to make big amounts of HP with a carb then FI. There is no worrying about high pressure injectors, larger fuel rails, and higher performance fuel managments systems. However, if you are just droping in a LSx motor and leaving stock, it is cheaper to keep the FI. I think to go carb it is going to cost me and extra 600+ easy and I think I am being modest. However I do think it is neat to see someone carb one of these, just my opinion.
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 2
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LSX (swapping)
Transmission: 4L60E (swapping)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi 10 Bolt
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L
I think an LS1 pullout is probably cheapest. Sure it's more initially than a 5.3 but you're going to have to buy an LS1 intake, fbody accessories, fbody pan, windage and pickup etc.. anyways. Unless you can do the whole swap for dirt cheap it wouldn't be worth it anyways. Most people can't seem to do it dirt cheap so an extra $XXX for the LS1 versus a 5.3 or whatever isn't going to be a huge deal when you look at the overall price of the swap.
Trending Topics
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L
Well what are the different in deciding a cam choice between a 5.3 and a 6.0? i have wondered about the 6.0 but i didnt know what the difference was in the internals as compared to the 5.7 LS1 or the 5.3. I found a cam from texas speed and i would like to know if it will work or not. thanks alot guys, this forum is helping me out ALOT.
-Michael
-Michael
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I don't see anything neat about it, personally. Plenty have already done it. A couple in particular are very fast, but they're track cars, not DD's.
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L
Highly unlikely to need to tune at the track. Unless you're going to the track to tune.
Gen I SBC's, I'd agree. LSx, not true.
The OP hasn't indicated any particular use for the car. If we assume driver, then carb makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
I think you're underestimating, unless you have most of the parts already in hand.
I don't see anything neat about it, personally. Plenty have already done it. A couple in particular are very fast, but they're track cars, not DD's.
Gen I SBC's, I'd agree. LSx, not true.
The OP hasn't indicated any particular use for the car. If we assume driver, then carb makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
I think you're underestimating, unless you have most of the parts already in hand.
I don't see anything neat about it, personally. Plenty have already done it. A couple in particular are very fast, but they're track cars, not DD's.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L
Well what are the different in deciding a cam choice between a 5.3 and a 6.0? i have wondered about the 6.0 but i didnt know what the difference was in the internals as compared to the 5.7 LS1 or the 5.3. I found a cam from texas speed and i would like to know if it will work or not. thanks alot guys, this forum is helping me out ALOT.
-Michael
-Michael
On Probation
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L
right now just get it built with a 5.3. Later you can start on a better LSx using an L92 block, CNC-ported L92/LS3 heads, a stroker crank, and whatever else you'd really like.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rubblerubble
Transmissions and Drivetrain
18
Mar 13, 2016 06:57 PM







