Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
It was a lost cause searching through everything for a definitive example of this. Do any of you guys have pics of how much higher your front end was after the swap?
I want to order some lowering springs to compensate while I still have my A-arms off.
I want to order some lowering springs to compensate while I still have my A-arms off.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 00 SSEi / 94 C4
Engine: 231 / 383
Transmission: 4T65E / ZF 6sp
Axle/Gears: 2.93 / Dana 44 3:45
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
from what I just read comparing the L98, LT1, LT4, LT5 all within the LS weight
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: league city
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: SOLD!!!!!
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
if it is going to be one of the truck engines then the weight will be close to the earlier engines with aluminum heads. if it is a car ls engine i have heard it will give near an inch raise when in. they are all aluminum.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
Its just a fact that if you switch from the old SBC to the all aluminum LS1 you are droping weight. Not sure of the exact amount, but because its right over the front suspension, it will raise the front end a little. .
However..there are lots of factors as to HOW MUCH. Wear on your springs, condition of isolators, and other suspension parts. Most guys will tell you, all things equal, that doing the swap straight up will raise the front end anywhere from .75"-1". If you have busted, worn out front springs, you might not see that much. Ive heard of guys running v6 springs to compensate too. As one92rs mentioned, if you are running one of the 6.0 iron blocks with alum heads, you wont be losing quite as much. And if for some weird reason you were running the iron block with iron head...you wont shed much of anything
I decided to run Eibach ProKit springs on my car during my swap. I expected, since the kit lowers the front and rear evenly almost, to still have to drop the front end. However, even with the stock rear and front isolators in place, my car is almost dead even. I never did put it back together with the stock parts to check ride height.
But my point is..its going to be hard to get an exact answer on how much your car will sit higher. Its not a formula or exact science. You just have to keep in mind you are shedding some weight, and if you want to lower it anyway, get some springs and see where it falls. If it needs to come down some more, go from there.
J.
However..there are lots of factors as to HOW MUCH. Wear on your springs, condition of isolators, and other suspension parts. Most guys will tell you, all things equal, that doing the swap straight up will raise the front end anywhere from .75"-1". If you have busted, worn out front springs, you might not see that much. Ive heard of guys running v6 springs to compensate too. As one92rs mentioned, if you are running one of the 6.0 iron blocks with alum heads, you wont be losing quite as much. And if for some weird reason you were running the iron block with iron head...you wont shed much of anything
I decided to run Eibach ProKit springs on my car during my swap. I expected, since the kit lowers the front and rear evenly almost, to still have to drop the front end. However, even with the stock rear and front isolators in place, my car is almost dead even. I never did put it back together with the stock parts to check ride height.
But my point is..its going to be hard to get an exact answer on how much your car will sit higher. Its not a formula or exact science. You just have to keep in mind you are shedding some weight, and if you want to lower it anyway, get some springs and see where it falls. If it needs to come down some more, go from there.
J.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
The springs seem to be in incredible shape for a 139k car, they are also WS6 springs. I was just hoping to get some kind of rough estimate because I never got to see what my front end height was with a small block in it(bought it rolling). I really dont want to drop anything more than an inch and I figured if I bought the Eibach pro kit that it would just keep the front end higher with a lower stance, but I think I'll just buy them, install the fronts, and hopefully the balance of the eibach fronts with the stocks WS6 rears wont be to dramatic.
Guess maybe this would have been better for the Suspension/chassis section
Guess maybe this would have been better for the Suspension/chassis section
#6
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eastern VA
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt with 3.73
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
I swapped from a 305 TBI to an LS2 (all aluminum) and my front end stood up at between 1" to 2" and looked stupid (even though my stock springs had over 150,000 miles on them). I swapped in V6 front springs and, once they settled, the ride height was back to almost normal and it looks good. I'm not a huge fan of lowering our cars, but I plan on putting shorter springs up front with a higher spring rate since the V6 springs are pretty soft. Also, don't forget the back springs, because if they are worn, the back will squat down a bit and make the front look higher.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
Did you swap in full a/c and keep your battery up front and all? And it came up almost 2"?? Havent heard any going much over 1" but I imagine it depends on lots of stuff like I said before.
Here's my 86. LS1/T56. Full a/c and accesories. Eibach ProKit front and back. Factory front and rear isolators. Rides perfect, clears speed bumps no problem, and hooks crazy good with my relocation brackets, even on street tires. This was not a WS6 car..not that it matters at this level of modification.
This is my 87...and it WAS a WS6 car. Same exact swap as my 86... I had issues with ground clearance on this car...because of the y-pipe as you can see.
I got my ProKit used for a VERY good price off the classified boards here on TGO. They were already broken in and settled almost immediatly when I put them in. Im not a huge fan of lowering cars...but this is a pretty subtle drop, and in my opinoin left me with great fender gaps, and the 17" WS6 wheels filled the wheel wells nicely.
J.
Here's my 86. LS1/T56. Full a/c and accesories. Eibach ProKit front and back. Factory front and rear isolators. Rides perfect, clears speed bumps no problem, and hooks crazy good with my relocation brackets, even on street tires. This was not a WS6 car..not that it matters at this level of modification.
This is my 87...and it WAS a WS6 car. Same exact swap as my 86... I had issues with ground clearance on this car...because of the y-pipe as you can see.
I got my ProKit used for a VERY good price off the classified boards here on TGO. They were already broken in and settled almost immediatly when I put them in. Im not a huge fan of lowering cars...but this is a pretty subtle drop, and in my opinoin left me with great fender gaps, and the 17" WS6 wheels filled the wheel wells nicely.
J.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eastern VA
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt with 3.73
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
I did full A/C and everything, battery still in the stock location; really the only difference is removed the washer reservoir, as it was in the way of my fabbed intake. It probably wasn't a full 2", but it was certainly more than 1".
#9
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
This is what happened to my front end height after the aluminum LS1/4L60E swap:
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: any clime or place...
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
^har har har.
...jealous.
...jealous.
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cincinnati/Camp Lejeune
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro wide body
Engine: 421 Dart SHP SBC
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
Even just changing my hood to fiberglass raised it up maybe a half of inch.
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
I thought the difference of going from all all iron SBC to an all aluminum LS1 was about a 140lb drop in weight.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
I was thinking around #150 myself, so that is a pretty dramatic decrease in sprung front end weight. Plus whatever else you remove such as the A/C wich is probably around another 30lbs maybe?
And I assume that is totally throwing off what the stock springs were designed around.
And I assume that is totally throwing off what the stock springs were designed around.
#15
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
I read this info in "How to Build a High-Performance Chevy LS1/LS6 V-8's:
LS1 is 430 lbs (add 88 lbs for iron truck block)
Gen I and II small block (chevy 350) is 531 lbs
For transmissions, I've found these weights:
T5 is 75 lbs dry
T56 is 125 lbs dry.
So going from a 305 with a T5 to an aluminum LSX with a T56, my car will lose about 51 lbs. I'm going to keep the airconditioning, but I didn't compare all the weights of the accessory drive.
LS1 is 430 lbs (add 88 lbs for iron truck block)
Gen I and II small block (chevy 350) is 531 lbs
For transmissions, I've found these weights:
T5 is 75 lbs dry
T56 is 125 lbs dry.
So going from a 305 with a T5 to an aluminum LSX with a T56, my car will lose about 51 lbs. I'm going to keep the airconditioning, but I didn't compare all the weights of the accessory drive.
#16
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
Stock springs for Trans Am with 16 inch tires is
Moog 5662 installation height:10.75"...load: 1690 lbs...spring rate in lbs per inch: 748
Stock springs for base model firebird with 5.0L engine and A/C
Moog 5642 installation height: 11"...load: 1860 lbs...spring rate in lbs per inch: 420
Stock springs for Trans Am with 15 inch tires:
Moog 5610 installation height: 11"...load: 1750 lbs...spring rate in lbs per inch: 420
Stock springs for firebird with V6:
Moog 5608 installation height: 11"...load: 1640 lbs...spring rate in lbs per inch: 420
Moog 5662 installation height:10.75"...load: 1690 lbs...spring rate in lbs per inch: 748
Stock springs for base model firebird with 5.0L engine and A/C
Moog 5642 installation height: 11"...load: 1860 lbs...spring rate in lbs per inch: 420
Stock springs for Trans Am with 15 inch tires:
Moog 5610 installation height: 11"...load: 1750 lbs...spring rate in lbs per inch: 420
Stock springs for firebird with V6:
Moog 5608 installation height: 11"...load: 1640 lbs...spring rate in lbs per inch: 420
Last edited by johnw999; 04-22-2014 at 04:53 PM.
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ashland Va
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 IROCZ
Engine: 5.3 Gen IV
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt 4.10
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
Mine is about 1 inch higher in the front give or take. That is with no AC.
#18
Re: Front end height after aluminum LS1 swap?
I may have found what I'm looking for. The Moog 5660 springs are for the 1991 and 1992 Z28, standard transmission, without A/C. It's not designated as a spring for any of the firebirds. Sounds like these are the front springs for the 1LE. The specs are what I need as I have the Trans Am with the 16 inch tires.
Moog 5660 installation height: 10.75"...load: 1538 lbs...spring rate in lbs per inch: 598
It's 150 lbs less than my stock springs. So if I get a lighter radiator, I'll be close to that number.
Moog 5660 installation height: 10.75"...load: 1538 lbs...spring rate in lbs per inch: 598
It's 150 lbs less than my stock springs. So if I get a lighter radiator, I'll be close to that number.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
06-13-2021 01:13 PM