5.3L Swap
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 5.3L Swap
Who swapped the 5.3 into that '94 Suburban? Because they didn't come that way.
The 5.3 swap is popular, but all the 5.3 info is in the LSx category.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/ltx-lsx/
The 5.3 swap is popular, but all the 5.3 info is in the LSx category.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/ltx-lsx/
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,079
Likes: 4
From: Pepperell, MA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: LQ9/L92
Transmission: 4L60E
Re: 5.3L Swap
i would go to see the motor in person first - that year would have had a 305 or 350 in it, as the 5.3's weren't around until 99. If it is a true 5.3 (and the owner's not confused), they can be pretty nice motors, but do require a bit of money and work to get in place. as ronnjonn mentioned, take a look around the LSX section of the board for what's involved.
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: DFW/LBC
Car: 71' Chevelle
Engine: 496ci 675HP Streetable!
Transmission: TH400 3500 Stall 9.5" Converter
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 5.3L Swap
94 suburbans had 350 TBI engines....not 5.3s. It if it is the 350 TBI stay away... 180HP stock, flat tappet cam and not much to do with them.
Now if you can find an LQ4 or LQ9 jump on it....these with a cam can produce 450+HP with no extra work and they have aluminum heads stock. The bottom end has been known to handle 600+ HP on Turbo applications and it will be an iron block.
Now if you can find an LQ4 or LQ9 jump on it....these with a cam can produce 450+HP with no extra work and they have aluminum heads stock. The bottom end has been known to handle 600+ HP on Turbo applications and it will be an iron block.
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Andalusia, AL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 5.3L Swap
if it's a true ls based 5.3, jump on it! like notalent said, a decent cam and intake and u'll raw insane amount of HP gain, currently doing the swap myself, and i gotta say so far it's so worth it...
Re: 5.3L Swap
Ok ok this guys truck is an 04, lol sorry I mis heard him.
But he said it is a 5.3L, 325?
I asked around about the engine and I was told to be careful because some are made strictly for trucks and they have a very tall deck height
(which I thought that all a 5.3 came in was a Cadillac and a Chevy truck)
Would I have to use the 4l60e transmission with the 5.3?
But he said it is a 5.3L, 325?
I asked around about the engine and I was told to be careful because some are made strictly for trucks and they have a very tall deck height
(which I thought that all a 5.3 came in was a Cadillac and a Chevy truck)
Would I have to use the 4l60e transmission with the 5.3?
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Andalusia, AL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 5.3L Swap
5.3's will work in third gens, all u have to do is get an f-body oil pan, f-body acc. drive, and a ls1/ ls6 intake and everything should be fine, (that's what i've been told) but if it's a true 5.3 (323) get it, i was lucky to get my 4.8 for what i got it for... if you do decide to get it pocket has a pretty much walk through thread "ls1 wiring: start to finish" the ls swaps are well worth the time and effort from what i've heard, i'll let you know how i like mine when it's finished
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 5.3L Swap
The modern GM 5.3L V8 is 325.1 cubic inches, ( 3.77953 x 3.77953 x 3.62205 x 0.7854 x 8 ) NOT 323, and has been used in Chevy, GMC and Cadillac SUVs, Chevy and GMC pickups and vans.
All of them had the 9.24" decks, none were more than a thousandth taller or shorter.
All of them had the 9.24" decks, none were more than a thousandth taller or shorter.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
It's an LS1-type engine. Read the LS1 swap sticky, and pay particular attention to the part about using a truck engine in a 3rd gen.
It's not the "deck height" that is different, it's the intake manifold height. And the oil pan sticks way down.
Just read the sticky.
It's not the "deck height" that is different, it's the intake manifold height. And the oil pan sticks way down.
Just read the sticky.
Re: 5.3L Swap
Can't wait to get my hands on it!! 8D
OR....
I can always go to IAA, find a wrecked (beyond repair of course) SS 2010 Camaro and pull the engine and transmission out of it. O_o
Thoughts?
OR....
I can always go to IAA, find a wrecked (beyond repair of course) SS 2010 Camaro and pull the engine and transmission out of it. O_o
Thoughts?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 5.3L Swap
If you insist on a 6.2, then the L92 truck version is mostly the same as the L99, except the manifolds, oilpan and accessories. It's a bit more common.
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Ashland Va
Car: 88 IROCZ
Engine: 5.3 Gen IV
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt 4.10
Re: 5.3L Swap
If you can find one and have the funds i would say go for it. I if you were going that route i would just get a complete drop out from a 4th gen ls1 car for your first swap. The electronics and all that stuff would be much easier to mess with than the 5th gens IMO. plus you would still need the 4th gen oil pan and accys
Re: 5.3L Swap
lol it's just so hard to choose.
It would be more convenient to find a 4th gen but I just think that like you said,with some $$$ of course and patience..that 6.2L would look so good under the hood of a Third Gen.
I've actually seen wrecked SS Camaro's at that particular auction but you are right, there aren't many of the V8 series there.
Mainly the V6 models, Which then again I wouldn't mind swapping a 3.6L from that car and into my 92 which is a V6 anyways..and I believe even those push 290-300HP correct me if i'm wrong.
It'd be different..lol
It would be more convenient to find a 4th gen but I just think that like you said,with some $$$ of course and patience..that 6.2L would look so good under the hood of a Third Gen.
I've actually seen wrecked SS Camaro's at that particular auction but you are right, there aren't many of the V8 series there.
Mainly the V6 models, Which then again I wouldn't mind swapping a 3.6L from that car and into my 92 which is a V6 anyways..and I believe even those push 290-300HP correct me if i'm wrong.
It'd be different..lol
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 655
Likes: 2
From: NH
Car: 1967 Firebird P.T.
Engine: LS3 4" Strkr 422ci
Transmission: MN12 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 8.5" 10 Bolt Eaton
Re: 5.3L Swap
lol it's just so hard to choose.
It would be more convenient to find a 4th gen but I just think that like you said,with some $$$ of course and patience..that 6.2L would look so good under the hood of a Third Gen.
I've actually seen wrecked SS Camaro's at that particular auction but you are right, there aren't many of the V8 series there.
Mainly the V6 models, Which then again I wouldn't mind swapping a 3.6L from that car and into my 92 which is a V6 anyways..and I believe even those push 290-300HP correct me if i'm wrong.
It'd be different..lol
It would be more convenient to find a 4th gen but I just think that like you said,with some $$$ of course and patience..that 6.2L would look so good under the hood of a Third Gen.
I've actually seen wrecked SS Camaro's at that particular auction but you are right, there aren't many of the V8 series there.
Mainly the V6 models, Which then again I wouldn't mind swapping a 3.6L from that car and into my 92 which is a V6 anyways..and I believe even those push 290-300HP correct me if i'm wrong.
It'd be different..lol
Id advise against the V6. Yes it makes major power for its size, but they are EXTREMELY complicated and to swap it, you'd be blazing your own trail. Makes the swap a bit more challenging. Plus, the AFAIK the PCM still hasnt been cracked so you're stuck with all the unwanted features like VATS or the modern equivalent and have to invent a solution
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: 5.3L Swap
Not many totalled 5th gen 'maros yet, but the engines will be big $$. The a/t version is the less desirable L99 while the much scarcer m/t version is the Ls3 that everyone thinks they want. Both are 6.2L, but the L99 has AFM and VVT, while the LS3 does without one of those two features.
If you insist on a 6.2, then the L92 truck version is mostly the same as the L99, except the manifolds, oilpan and accessories. It's a bit more common.
If you insist on a 6.2, then the L92 truck version is mostly the same as the L99, except the manifolds, oilpan and accessories. It's a bit more common.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hello, Michael
Engine Swap
8
Aug 20, 2015 03:19 PM








